Chemical safety bill may have good shot

Most Americans believe the chemicals in products they buy in the supermarket have been tested for safety. But the scandalous truth is our main chemical safety law is so badly broken that no one has the authority to ensure the safety of chemicals used in everything from cleaning products to clothes to couches. Until we fix that, Washington state families will continue to be guinea pigs for every chemical on the market or will come on the market.

This is an issue every parent and every family should care about. Tens of thousands of chemicals are in products on the market today and science has increasingly tied some of them to cancer, infertility, diabetes, Parkinson’s and other illnesses.

For years Congress failed to fix this problem because they were unable to get the bipartisan support necessary to pass a bill. Public health advocates, including the Environmental defense fund, would lend our support to “ideal” legislation, only to see it blocked by allies of the chemical industry. And in the meantime, Americans were left exposed to these dangerous or untested chemicals.

Some states have worked hard to fill the void. But with few resources, they have been unable to make much of a dent. All told, only about a dozen chemicals or chemical groups have been restricted by states in the last four decades. In Washington state, only nine chemicals face state restrictions, and those only for limited uses.

But recently, something remarkable has happened. In a Congress known for gridlock, a bipartisan group of senators developed legislation that actually fixes the biggest problems in the current system — and has a real chance of becoming law. The Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act — named after the late anti-tobacco crusader who wrote the original version — has 41 co-sponsors in the Senate, evenly divided between Democrats and Republicans. Washington state’s Sens. Maria Cantwell and Patty Murray are closely following the issue, as well. It is the kind of bipartisan momentum rarely seen on any issue in Washington.

This bill is not only bipartisan; it’s solid. The bill would:

Require a safety review for all chemicals in use today.

Ensure all new chemicals pass a safety check before they can be sold.

Explicitly require protection for those most at risk from toxic chemicals, such as children and pregnant women.

Give the EPA new authority to require companies to test chemicals for safety.

Increase the availability of health information on chemicals in use to states, first responders and the general public.

The broad support for these tough new requirements didn’t just happen. The chemical industry finally realized that the lack of a strong system to give consumers confidence in their products was hurting their business. They also prefer a national system to a state-by-state patchwork. So to get that, they’ve made significant concessions to public health and environmental advocates. The bill represents a compromise, but one that is vastly better than current law and finally breaks decades of failed attempts at reform.

What is clearly unacceptable is to stay with the status quo. Under the current system all Americans are losing. Its failures represent a serious and growing public health calamity. American families cannot afford to watch Congress squander the best opportunity ever to improve protections from toxic chemicals. Congress needs to pass this legislation now.

Richard Denison is a lead senior scientist in the Environmental Defense Fund’s Health Program.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Saturday, June 7

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer testifies during a budget hearing before a House Appropriations subcommittee on Capitol Hill in Washington on Thursday, May 15, 2025. (Al Drago/The New York Times)
Editorial: Ending Job Corps a short-sighted move by White House

If its jobs the Trump administration hopes to bring back to the U.S., it will need workers to fill them.

Comment: We can’t manage what we refuse to measure

The Trump administration’s war against climate science will compound the devastation from disasters.

Comment: Proposed stadium is an investment in Everett’s future

A methodical process has outlined a multipurpose facility that can be built without new taxes.

Comment: Some DEI programs ensured protection of veterans’ health

Cut as a cost-saving measure, such programs helped ensure services for women and minorities.

Forum: Nonprofits and communities face an existential crisis

When missions, and not just methods, are questioned, how do groups reweave to remain vital and valued?

The Buzz: As long as we’re all going to die, might as well laugh

Split you sides as Elon and Trump split the sheets. And Sen. Debbie Downer lightens the mood at a town hall.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Friday, June 6

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

A rendering of possible configuration for a new multi-purpose stadium in downtown Everett. (DLR Group)
Editorial: Latest ballpark figures drive hope for new stadium

A lower estimate for the project should help persuade city officials to move ahead with plans.

Schwab: Reveling in the dis-Enlightenment of America

Fearing an educated and informed electorate, Trump and MAGA target knowledge, science and reason.

Is church engaged in ‘worship warfare’?

Imagine; Snohomish’s very own Russell Johnson, pastor of the Pursuit Church, quoted… Continue reading

Christians’ civic engagement is a right and duty

Recent calls for Christians to avoid political involvement in the name of… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.