Health board should set rules for vaping in public

Before the risks of second-hand cigarette smoke were better understood and led to laws that curtailed smoking in public places, it was common to hear a polite tobacco user ask: “Mind if I smoke?”

Comedian Steve Martin had a snappy comeback that we won’t repeat here — kids, ask your parents — but which might again be useful with the growth in the use of e-cigarettes.

E-cigarettes are battery-powered, typically cylindrical devices that heat a small amount of flavored liquid, commonly containing nicotine, into an aerosol vapor that is inhaled like tobacco smoke, resulting in a pretty impressive cloud when exhaled.

Users of e-cigarettes and the vaping industry defend the devices as a substitute for tobacco and as a way for many to quit smoking. According to a recent study by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, about 12.6 percent of all adults and 21.6 percent of young adults 18 to 24 have tried vaping at least once, but only 3.7 percent currently use e-cigarettes every day or on some days. The same study also found that current tobacco smokers and those who had quit smoking within the past year were more likely to use e-cigarettes than former smokers or adults who had never smoked.

There’s conflicting information on the safety of e-cigarettes. A review of evidence published by Public Health England, the United Kingdom’s public health agency, found that vaping is significantly less harmful than smoking because the carcinogens and other unhealthful components of cigarette smoke aren’t present in e-cigarettes.

But the vaping liquid often does contain nicotine, which is an addictive drug. And the liquid used isn’t regulated by the federal Food and Drug Administration. There is no standard for the ingredients in the liquid, and often ingredients aren’t listed beyond a general description of the flavors. While anecdotal, there also have been reports of vaping devices exploding and causing fires.

Were this simply a matter of personal risk, it would be up to individual users to determine whether this was a safe choice for themselves. But just as we have passed laws that address second-hand smoke, until more is known about what’s exhaled into the air we all breathe and what the risks are for others, specifically pregnant women, children and those with compromised lungs, we need to place the same restrictions on public vaping that we do on public smoking.

The Snohomish Health District’s Board of Health on Tuesday, will hold a final public hearing and could vote to adopt changes to the county’s sanitary code that would consider vaping in public similar to smoking:

  • The use of e-cigarettes would be prohibited in public places, including restaurants and bars, and in places of employment.
  • E-cigarette products couldn’t be sold to or possessed by minors.
  • Sales would require photo ID and the products would have to be kept behind a counter in a secured display.

The proposal would make an exception that would allow some of the shops selling e-cigarette products to offer sampling of the vaping devices and liquid.

The Snohomish Health District has not rushed the process. Three months ago, district staff, led by Director and Health Office Gary Goldbaum, began seeking public comment on the proposal and specifically sought out the opinions of shop owners and those who use the products. The exception for sampling was a result of that process.

Goldbaum isn’t arguing with those who see these as life-saving devices and as a way to stop smoking.

But he does have concerns for what we don’t know about the contents of the liquid and about the use of vaping products by youths. The state Department of Health’s 2014 Healthy Youth Survey found that nearly 1 in 4 high school seniors had used e-cigarettes in the past 30 days, raising the likelihood of nicotine addiction. The flavored liquid also can also pose a risk of poisoning if ingested by children.

“Safer doesn’t mean safe,” Goldbaum said.

E-cigarettes have been around for about 10 years, and we’re just now learning more about their potential benefits and risks to health. Some restrictions regarding their use in public are reasonable and necessary.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

RGB version
Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, April 30

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

County Council members Jared Mead, left, and Nate Nehring speak to students on Thursday, Jan. 30, 2025, during Civic Education Day at the Snohomish County Campus in Everett, Washington. (Will Geschke / The Herald)
Editorial: Students get a life lesson in building bridges

Two county officials’ civics campaign is showing the possibilities of discourse and government.

Welch: State’s gun permit law harms rights, public safety

Making it more difficult for those following the law to obtain a firearm won’t solve our crime problem.

Comment: Trump faithful need to take a chill pill

The president is struggling because his most ardent supporters have overestimated threats to the U.S.

Snohomish’s Fire District 4’s finances OK without levy measure

During the April 15 Snohomish City Council meeting, Fire District 4’s architect… Continue reading

Overblown ‘crisis’ blocking legitimate prescription opioids

Over the last decade or so, mainstream media like The Herald have… Continue reading

President Trump wrong on Garcia, tariffs and Ukraine

At this point, what I’ll say about deportations is that the Trump… Continue reading

toon
Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, April 29

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Comment: What’s harming science is a failure to communicate

Scientists need better public engagement to show the broader impact and value of their work.

Dowd: Instead of leaders we get Trump’s vicious sewing circle

Women were once deemed unfit for office as too emotional. Trump’s Cabinet is stocked with Real Housewives.

Saunders: Even supporters nervous about Trump’s tariff gambit

Trump’s tough talk worked with NATO, but so far he has little to show from tariff’s economic havoc.

Comment: War on ‘woke’ could end up killing U.S. innovation

‘Elite’ universities aren’t without fault, but starving research is eroding American competitiveness.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.