Ground rules for clean water

As the Flint, Michigan, water scandal and resulting health crisis sludges on, a new Dutch study has found that four billion people, or 66 percent of the world’s population, lack access to fresh water for at least one month out of the year. This is many more people than previously thought. A new computer model led to more precise and comprehensive numbers, according to the researchers at the Netherlands’ University of Twente.

Severe water scarcity is identified by falling groundwater levels, lakes drying up and lower-flowing rivers. Water supplies for industry and farmers are threatened. Dr. Arjen Hoekstra, who led the study, notes that The World Economic Forum places the world water crisis in the top three of global problems, alongside climate change and terrorism, Nature World News reported.

The study cites growing populations, increased agricultural irrigation, higher living standards, consumption practices and climate change as the leading causes of severe scarcity and decreased water quality. Consequently, half of those without access to water are in the world’s two most populous countries — India and China. Other problem areas include northern and southern Africa, southern Europe, the Middle East, and Australia. It all sounds so far away until Mexico and the Western U.S. pop up on the list.

Economic losses due to crop failure, limited food availability, loss of environmental biodiversity and heightened global conflict are all outcomes of water scarcity, according to the report. The threat can be reduced by placing limits on water consumption, boosting water use efficiency, and improving sharing of fresh water resources, the researchers said.

Here in the Pacific Northwest, it’s difficult not to take our abundant, clean water for granted. The fact that our drinking water is so clean and good makes it easy to assume all our waters are clean. But the polluted rivers, streams and groundwater that feed the polluted Puget and Possession sounds, threaten all sea life, and the fish Northwesterners consume with gusto.

One factor contributing to the water pollution is un-monitored septic systems, according the King County Board of Health, which will discuss this week a plan to charge a $40 annual fee on septic system users to help pay for more monitoring because it currently doesn’t have the funds to do so, KING-TV, Channel 5 reported.

Darrell Rodgers with King County Public Health told the station that 192 of the area’s rivers, streams and other waterways have some form of pollution connected to untreated contamination that gets into the groundwater from septic systems. As one of the worst examples, septic system pollution into Quartermaster Harbor on Vashon Island has prevented shellfishing for nearly 20 years, Rogers said.

King County estimates it has 40,000 septic systems; Snohomish County, on its website, reports that more than 78,000 homes rely on septic systems.

Keeping our water clean requires protection and action. Our most precious resource needs nurturing, or it won’t be precious for long. Since this is a regional problem, which is part of a global crisis, perhaps the state, or consortium of counties from Thurston to Whatcom, can come up with universal rules, regulations and fees that apply to all, in addition to a mapping of all septic systems, in order to streamline inspections, improvements, and the ability to identify and fine polluters.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

2024 Presidential Election Day Symbolic Elements.
Editorial: A recap of Herald Editorial Board endorsements

By The Herald Editorial Board Voters, open up your ballots and voters… Continue reading

toon
Editorial cartoons for Monday, Oct. 27

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

toon
Editorial cartoons for Thursday, Oct. 23

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Comment: White House didn’t need Trump’s Mar-a-Lago makeover

The ‘billionaire’s ballroom’ will stand as a garish monument to one man’s taste for gold-plated everything.

In an official White House photo, President Lyndon Johnson shakes hands with Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. after signing the Voting Rights Act of 1965, in Washington on Aug. 6, 1965. The Supreme Court has shown a willingness to chip away at the landmark civil rights legislation. A Louisiana case could unravel much of its remaining power. (Yoichi Okamoto/Lyndon B. Johnson Library via The New York Times) — NO SALES. FOR EDITORIAL USE ONLY. —
Comment: Ruling could effectively end landmark voting rights act

If the Supreme Court throws out Section 2 of the act, Republicans could gain up to 19 more seats.

Add name to petition to impeach President Trump

Impeach Trump Add name to petition for action Donald Trump has violated… Continue reading

Can bribe to leave the country be expanded?

Bribes to leave U.S. Can the offer be expanded? Have you seen… Continue reading

Immigration isn’t the problem many believe

Immigration Not the problem many believe The immigration problem is an exaggeration… Continue reading

2024 Presidential Election Day Symbolic Elements.
Editorial: Elect Allison, Golebiewski to Mill Creek council

Allison merits a second term for Position 3. Golebiewski should be elected to Position 4’s open seat.

2024 Presidential Election Day Symbolic Elements.
Editorial: Low merits third term on Snohomish County Council

Low has successfully represented his constituents as a council member and a state lawmaker.

2024 Presidential Election Day Symbolic Elements.
Editorial: Yes on SJR 8201 a prudent investment for WA Cares

Voters should place the long-term care benefit’s fund in the hands of the state investment board.

October 23, 2025: No Kings Protest
Editorial cartoons for Sunday, Oct. 26

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.