Group’s lawsuit threatens Wilderness Act it seeks to protect

More than 50 yeas ago, when the Wilderness Act of 1964 created the nation’s system of wilderness preservation, the intent was to recognize those backcountry areas as places “where the earth and its community of life are untrammeled by man, where man himself is a visitor who does not remain.”

For the most part that has meant, along with rules limiting the use of motorized equipment, that no permanent structures are allowed in wilderness areas. But that ethic has been complicated where wilderness designations have been placed on areas where fire lookouts, trail shelters and similar structures have existed for decades, often long before creation of the Wilderness Act itself.

That was the struggle that for several years pitted a Montana-based wilderness advocacy group against the National Forest Service and residents in the Darrington area who fought to save the historic Green Mountain fire lookout in the Glacier Peak Wilderness. Wilderness Watch sued in 2010 to have the lookout removed, following restoration work it claimed violated the act. Ultimately, it took an act of Congress in the weeks after the Oso landslide to save the structure.

Wilderness Watch has now set its attention against five structures within the wilderness areas of Olympic National Park, and has filed suit in a federal District Court in Tacoma, seeking removal of a cabin and four three-sided trail shelters in the park, again claiming that maintenance and restoration of the structures violates the act.

But the cabin and shelters were standing long before the creation of the Wilderness Act, and each carries some historical significance for the era in which it was built. One, the Canyon Creek Shelter, was built by crews with the Civilian Conservation Corps in 1939 and overlooks Sol Duc Falls. It is the last such structure built by the CCC that remains in the park and was placed on the National Historic Register in 2007. Another, Botten Cabin, was built in 1928, features hand-crafted dovetail-notched corners and was added to the register in 2007 because of its architectural significance and its association with Olympic’s recreational history.

To protect the threatened structures, the National Trust for Historic Preservation, the Washington Trust for Historic Preservation and the Friends of Olympic National Park have joined with the National Parks Service as defendants against the Wilderness Watch suit. Oral arguments are expected later this summer.

“We are asking the court to affirm the National Park Service’s authority to maintain and manage Olympic’s historic structures in accordance with the National Historic Preservation Act and the Wilderness Act,” said Brian Turner, senior field officer and an attorney with the national trust. “These two laws are in the public interest and should be used in concert to guide the stewardship of all wilderness areas to ensure that future generations are able to experience the wealth of America’s natural and historic treasures.”

Without a doubt, America’s wilderness areas need watchdogs, and Wilderness Watch has fulfilled that role on many occasions, but its campaign against trail shelters, cabins and lookouts, particularly those with historic value, is myopic and fails to, well, see the forest for the trees.

Last summer, Washington state members of Congress Sen. Patty Murray and Rep. Derek Kilmer introduced the Wild Olympics Act to add wilderness protection to more than 126,000 acres of National Forest land that surrounds Olympic National Park and also place 19 rivers and tributaries on the Olympic Peninsula in the nation’s Wild and Scenic River system.

Battles over rustic shelters only divert time and resources that instead could be used to lobby for passage of the Wild Olympics bill. More importantly, such rigid demands risk the loss of public support for the protections offered by the Wilderness Act.

In wilderness, man is a visitor who should not remain. But fewer squabbles over inconsequential issues will help ensure that the wilderness does remain.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

2024 Presidential Election Day Symbolic Elements.
Editorial: Selecting county charter review panel fundamental

Voters’ picks of three members of the panel will help determine what amendments they see next fall.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Saturday, Oct. 11

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Comment: AI can be health care boon; it needs national policy

The technology offers great promise but must have predictable and consistent policy guidance.

Comment: State’s new digital ad tax complicated, sloppy and iffy

The untested tax, rushed to passage to fill a state revenue hole, is being challenged in court.

Forum: Recognize worth of hard-working immigrant neighbors

Many came here for better lives and have helped build our communities. They deserve citizenship.

The Buzz: We were hoping they were talking about Bugs Bunny

A cease-fire in Gaza. The government shutdown. OK, big deals, but what about the Super Bowl halftime show?

Comment: Social media isn’t the town square politicians think it is

Only a few of each side’s base supporters get their news online. And actual voters aren’t impressed.

2024 Presidential Election Day Symbolic Elements.
Editorial: Frizzell best choice for diverse, growing Lynnwood

City council member Hurst has legitimate financial concerns, but Frizzell remains a skilled leader.

2024 Presidential Election Day Symbolic Elements.
Editorial: Mata, Leutwyler for Lynnwood council seats

With the city facing a budget crisis, voters will determine who serves on four council seats.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Friday, Oct. 10

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Schwab: Take the fork in the road or stick a fork in democracy

When troops kick down doors and zip-tie kids, when food aid is destroyed, there’s a choice to be made.

City of Snohomish: Keep incumbents for mayor, council

After attending the City of Snohomish candidate forum, I remain concerned about… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.