State’s restroom rule respects the privacy of all

Usually a wave of the hand and a polite “no, thank you,” is enough to let those gathering signatures for an initiative petition know that you’re not interested in signing.

Joseph Backholm, director of the Family Policy Institute of Washington and spokesman for Initiative 1515, has told his signature gathers to be more persuasive. Initiative 1515 would repeal the state law adopted through a rule-making process by the state Human Rights Commission last year that allows transgender individuals to use the bathroom or changing facility of their sexual identity rather than the gender of their birth.

In audio recordings, Backholm advises male signature gatherers:

“For the gentlemen, what I would encourage you to do, if you are so bold and to make the point, take your petition and stand outside the women’s restroom at the mall. If any of the women don’t want to sign it, just go ahead and follow them in. Maybe this will be a better time to sign our little petition, and we can make the point that way.”

ADVERTISEMENT
0 seconds of 0 secondsVolume 0%
Press shift question mark to access a list of keyboard shortcuts
00:00
00:00
00:00
 

Since the recording went public, Backholm has said the comment was “kind of a dumb joke,” but done to make a point.

We don’t see the humor in “gentlemen” harassing women entering a restroom. And we don’t see Backholm’s point.

But then we don’t see the point of I-1515, which is attempting to secure at least 246,000 signatures of registered voters by July 8 to make the ballot in 2017.

The rule that I-1515 would overturn puts into practice the law that the Legislature passed in 2006 prohibiting discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity. Following a process that included four public hearings and opportunities for written comment on the draft rules, the Human Right’s Commission’s antidiscrimination rules took effect at the end of December.

The rule makes official a practice that has been commonplace in schools and in the public to accommodate the privacy of transgender people, as the privacy of all is respected. Several school districts in Snohomish County had policies in place to accommodate transgender students, even before the federal Department of Education issued a recent directive asking all school districts to provide for transgender students. Some districts, in addition to gender-specific restrooms and locker facilities, are offering gender-neutral facilities for those who prefer that option.

I-1515 isn’t the only challenge to the new rule. As recently reported by The Herald’s Jerry Cornfield, the state’s little-used Joint Administrative Rules Review Committee is hearing a request to suspend the law from 29 members of the state House Republican Caucus, including several Snohomish County lawmakers. The request followed unsuccessful attempts during the last year’s legislative session to repeal the law. But with the committee split between four Democrats and four Republicans, no action is expected.

There’s no need to repeal the rule. The voyeurism and harassment that opponents of the rule fear already are illegal and can appropriately be addressed by law enforcement, just as they might question a male signature gatherer chasing a woman into a restroom.

Scrapping the current rule is more than unnecessary; it could result in an increase of incidents of discrimination and harassment of transgender people and leave the state open to legal and economic problems, including the boycotts that North Carolina and other states now are experiencing after their legislatures passed laws that mandated transgender people use only the restrooms that conform to the gender they were born with.

For years, most transgender people have been using the restrooms of their gender identity, typically without incident. There’s no reason for that not to continue.

All it takes is some shared respect for all and the etiquette our parents taught us. You know: MYOB.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer testifies during a budget hearing before a House Appropriations subcommittee on Capitol Hill in Washington on Thursday, May 15, 2025. (Al Drago/The New York Times)
Editorial: Ending Job Corps a short-sighted move by White House

If it’s jobs the Trump administration hopes to bring back to the U.S., it will need workers to fill them.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Monday, June 9

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

A rendering of possible configuration for a new multi-purpose stadium in downtown Everett. (DLR Group)
Editorial: Latest ballpark figures drive hope for new stadium

A lower estimate for the project should help persuade city officials to move ahead with plans.

Comment: Trump’s science policy won’t set a ‘gold standard’

It’s more about centralizing control of science to make it easier to deny what it doesn’t agree with.

Comment: Can NASA’s popularity save it from deep budget cuts?

NASA logos are brand fixtures, a sign of public support. That could wane if cuts limit it’s reach into space.

Comment: Sen. Ernst’s sarcasm won’t help her keep her seat

Her blunt response regarding Medicaid cuts won’t play well in Iowa and won’t win back MAGA faithful.

Comment: Using prejudice against prejudice won’t end antisemitism

The Trump administration’s targeting of immigrants, dissent and universities only assures a longer fight.

A rendering of the new vessels to be built for Washington State Ferries. (Washington State Ferries)
Editorial: Local shipyard should get shot to build state ferries

If allowed to build at least two ferries, Nichols Brothers can show the value building here offers.

Solar panels are visible along the rooftop of the Crisp family home on Monday, Nov. 14, 2022 in Everett, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: ‘Big, beautiful bill’ would take from our climate, too

Along with cuts to the social safety net, the bill robs investments in the clean energy economy.

FILE — A Ukrainian drone pilot in the Kharkiv region of northeastern Ukraine on April 24, 2025. Assaults in Russia and Ukraine have shown major military powers that they are unprepared for evolving forms of warfare, and need to adapt. (Tyler Hicks/The New York Times)
Comment: How Ukraine’s drone strike upends the rules of warfare

Inexpensive drones reached deep into Russia to destroy aircraft that were used against Ukraine.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Sunday, June 8

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

When will Congress stand up to Trump?

Waste, fraud, and abuse? Look no further than the White House. Donald… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.