WASHINGTON – Justice Department antitrust regulators cleared the way Monday for Cingular Wireless LLC’s $41 billion acquisition of Redmond-based AT&T Wireless Services Inc., a crucial step toward creating the nation’s largest wireless telephone company.
The merger still must be approved by the Federal Communications Commission. That could come as early as today.
Under an agreement with the Justice Department filed in federal court in Washington, D.C., Cingular must divest itself of the new combined company’s assets in 11 states.
“Without these divestitures, wireless customers in these markets would have had fewer choices for their wireless telephone service and faced the risk of higher prices, lower quality service and fewer choices for the newest high-speech mobile wireless data services,” said R. Hewitt Pate, assistant attorney general for the Justice Department’s antitrust division.
Cingular is an Atlanta-based joint venture of BellSouth Corp. and SBC Communications Inc. of San Antonio. Its acquisition of AT&T Wireless would create a cellular phone colossus with 46 million customers, topping the 37.5 million customers of Verizon Wireless and paring the number of national wireless phone providers to five.
Together the two companies have about 70,000 employees, although layoffs are expected if the merger goes through as expected.
Stan Sigman, Cingular president and chief executive officer, said the new company would provide wireless services in 49 states and the 100 top metropolitan areas. AT&T Wireless officials deferred comment to Cingular.
“We hope the merger process will continue to progress in an orderly and expeditious fashion,” Sigman said. “This merger will create a premier provider that is very well-equipped to meet the most demanding needs of wireless customers today and in the future.”
The settlement requires the merged company to divest assets in parts of Connecticut, Georgia, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Missouri, Michigan, Oklahoma, Tennessee and Texas. These assets include wireless services businesses and radio wave spectrum licenses.
Two opponents of the deal – Consumers Union and the Consumer Federation of America – said the settlement does not do enough to protect consumers. They said the new company will have no incentive to compete against BellSouth and SBC in parts of the country where they overlap.
“This merger will have a devastating impact on consumers, who may have to pay more and may not receive the same level of service they currently enjoy,” said Mark Cooper, director of research at Consumer Federation of America. “It also will gut the incentive for these companies to come out with new and innovative products and services.”
Talk to us
> Give us your news tips.
> Send us a letter to the editor.
> More Herald contact information.
