When there’s a fight in Congress, reports and news releases from both sides of an issue are often issued with alarming language to support a certain position.
This certainly has been true with all the legislative proposals being recommended as Congress takes up the reauthorization of the Higher Education Act, which governs the federal student loan program.
But one issue in particular seems to have people playing fast and loose with the facts.
Rep. John Boehner, R-Ohio, chairman of the House Committee on Education and the Workforce, recently sent a letter to all the members of the House in support of changing, from a fixed to a variable rate, the interest charged to borrowers on consolidated student loans. Consumer advocates contend such a move would significantly increase loan payments for borrowers.
I recently wrote about this issue and thought I could turn away from the debate for a while and fuss about some other personal finance matter. But then I got an e-mail from the press secretary for Boehner’s committee. She sent me the details of Boehner’s "dear colleague" letter.
Rather than sway me to change my mind in favor of variable interest rates, the letter got me steamed.
Boehner should have gone into advertising. He’s good at hyperbole.
One of the headlines on the letter said: "Subsidies Will Go to Higher-Income Graduates, Not Low- and Middle-Income Students Struggling to Attend College."
In the letter, Boehner writes: "The ballooning cost of fixed-rate consolidation loans is a direct threat to college access for low- and middle-income students — the students who should be our first priority as Congress reauthorizes the Higher Education Act."
To back up his claim, Boehner used information from a report by the General Accounting Office that he says found that the chief beneficiaries of federal consolidation loans are not low- or middle-income students striving for college, but higher-income individuals who have graduated and entered the workforce.
Really?
Because I read the GAO report, and it does not say consolidation loans generally benefit rich people. Boehner didn’t use the word rich, but that’s what is implied in his letter.
Notice Boehner used the words "higher-income." His assertion may be true, and yet it is very misleading.
What the GAO report said is that the average income level for those who consolidate their student loans is $47,150. That’s only modestly above the median U.S. household income of $42,000.
So technically, people who consolidate their student loans do have incomes higher than those who don’t consolidate. I would think earning $47,000 a year still qualifies you as middle-income.
However, for the sake of argument, let’s say the consolidation program is benefiting people who studied medicine. We all assume doctors are high-income individuals who don’t need the government’s help, right?
Let’s look at the facts.
The average U.S. medical student has $104,000 in student loan debt, according to the American Medical Student Association. First-year medical residents earn an average of $33,387 a year, according to the association.
Assuming a debt level of $100,000, the association calculated that a variable rate would increase interest on loans by $17,000 over a 10-year period and $39,375 over a 20-year period.
High education debt plays a big role in why there is a shortage of physicians willing to practice in underserved areas or go into primary care fields, the association asserts.
OK, so maybe you still can’t feel sorry for a group of people who have the potential to earn six-figure salaries.
But the truth is, the majority of people who take advantage of the federal loan consolidation program aren’t BMW-driving doctors or other high-income earners living the high life because they have low-interest subsidized education loans. As it is, an estimated 39 percent of student borrowers are graduating with unmanageable levels of student debt, according to a report by the Public Interest Research Group’s Higher Education Project.
The federal consolidation program was created to simplify loan repayment and help borrowers manage their debt payments after college. And that is happening. In fact, the GAO report said that, overall, consolidation loan borrowers defaulted less often than borrowers who had not consolidated.
If the program stays as it is, it’s not a vote in favor of wealthier graduates at the expense of low- and middle-income people.
The federal student loan program may be about to undergo some major changes, some of which could cost borrowers a lot of money. At the very least, Boehner should be straight with the facts.
(c) Washington Post Writers Group
Talk to us
> Give us your news tips.
> Send us a letter to the editor.
> More Herald contact information.
