Tanker bid update

Fourteen U.S. senators sent the secretary of the U.S. Air Force a letter suggesting the agency award a lucrative tanker contract to one company, not two. The senators argue that splitting the contract would be not only expensive but also inefficient.

The Boeing Co. and duo Northrop Grumman-EADS are vying for the $40 billion deal.

Washington senators Maria Cantwell and Patty Murray signed the letter. Boeing would build its KC-767 in Everett. The finishing touches to Boeing’s tanker would be done in Kansas. Both Kansas senators also signed the letter.

Not surprisingly, the letter was not signed by senators in Alabama, where Northrop-EADS would build its KC-30.

The bid has become

increasingly political in the past few months. The Air Force is expected to reach a decision in late December or early January.

Here’s the text of the letter:

October 11, 2007

The Honorable Michael Wynne

Secretary

United States Air Force

1690 Air Force Pentagon

Washington, D.C. 20330

Dear Secretary Wynne:

As the Air Force moves forward in its selection process to replace its aging fleet of aerial refueling tankers, we write to express our strong support for your current acquisition strategy that will result in the selection of one tanker, not two. This selection process must be rigorous and represent a fair and open competition to ensure that the Air Force and the American taxpayer receive a product that provides the best value in meeting the specific needs of the warfighter.

A “split-buy” replacement strategy has been well debated as government, industry and indeed the American public strives to identify the best policy to replace our aging aerial refueling tanker fleet. Under the “split-buy” proposal, the Air Force and the Department of Defense would simultaneously develop, test and procure two tanker aircraft. Proponents assert that this policy would reduce costs through enhanced competition and expand operational flexibility to the Air Force. We find these assertions to be fundamentally flawed.

To the contrary, a process that guarantees the procurement of two tankers removes all benefits associated with a competitive process by guaranteeing business to potential manufacturers. This would eliminate any incentive for these manufacturers to maximize efficiencies in the development of a product that ensures taxpayers and the Air Force the best value. In fact, a “split-buy” approach would likely lead to higher costs to the Air Force over time.

Due to the size and duration of the planned procurement, as well as the anticipated multi-decade service of the new fleet, a true cost assessment of recapitalization must include the initial purchase price as well as the lifecycle cost of operating and sustaining the tanker fleet. According to experts within the Air Force, as well as prominent industry and policy analysts, procurement of two refueling tankers would undoubtedly lead to a dramatic increase in research and development, maintenance, training and infrastructure costs.

If the Air Force moves to retire aging KC-135 “R” and “E” models as well as its KC-10’s, while concurrently phasing in two new tankers, the agency would be forced to shoulder the costs of maintaining five aircraft systems as opposed to four. Loren Thompson, a defense analyst at the Lexington Institute, states that “Sustaining two different lines…would raise the Air Force’s acquisition costs by well over a billion dollars annually compared with just running one line…” At a time when our country’s national debt continues to grow, we must do all we can to ensure that we are utilizing taxpayer resources responsibly.

In addition to increased costs, a “split-buy” scenario will delay delivery of these vital assets. Under the current procurement schedule, the Air Force will acquire between 12 and 14 tankers annually. While officials within the Air Force have expressed the desire to accelerate this schedule to more rapidly replace the current fleet, under a “split-buy,” scarce resources will be divided between two systems resulting in inefficient production rates due to a loss of economies of scale. The result would mean increased tanker modernization costs and a delay in the development and delivery of new tankers.

Lastly, a “split-buy” will compromise the operational flexibility of the Air Force. Under this proposal, the Air Force would be forced to coordinate the utilization of a fleet of tankers with vastly different capabilities, operational requirements and infrastructure needs. This would exacerbate already existing logistical challenges and compromise the agility of the Air Force in responding to rapidly evolving conditions and needs. These inefficiencies would reduce the safety of our service men and women and that is simply unacceptable.

For these reasons, we strongly believe that competition for a single tanker replacement represents the most appropriate approach to recapitalizing the tanker fleet. Therefore, we strenuously oppose any attempt to change the current acquisition strategy to facilitate a dual procurement or “split-buy” approach. We appreciate your efforts, and those of Assistant Secretary Payton and General T. Michael Moseley, in working to publicly set the record straight that the on-going KC-X Tanker competition is for one tanker, not two. Thank you for your consideration and for your continued support and advocacy of this policy.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Business

The livery on a Boeing plane. (Christopher Pike / Bloomberg)
Former Lockheed Martin CFO joins Boeing as top financial officer

Boeing’s Chief Financial Officer is being replaced by a former CFO at… Continue reading

Izaac Escalante-Alvarez unpacks a new milling machine at the new Boeing machinists union’s apprentice training center on Friday, June 6, 2025 in Everett, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Boeing Machinists union training center opens in Everett

The new center aims to give workers an inside track at Boeing jobs.

Some SnoCo stores see shortages after cyberattack on grocery supplier

Some stores, such as Whole Foods and US Foods CHEF’STORE, informed customers that some items may be temporarily unavailable.

People take photos and videos as the first Frontier Arlines flight arrives at Paine Field Airport under a water cannon salute on Monday, June 2, 2025 in Everett, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Water cannons salute Frontier on its first day at Paine Field

Frontier Airlines joins Alaska Airlines in offering service Snohomish County passengers.

Amit B. Singh, president of Edmonds Community College. 201008
Edmonds College and schools continue diversity programs

Educational diversity programs are alive and well in Snohomish County.

A standard jet fuel, left, burns with extensive smoke output while a 50 percent SAF drop-in jet fuel, right, puts off less smoke during a demonstration of the difference in fuel emissions on Tuesday, March 28, 2023 in Everett, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Sustainable aviation fuel center gets funding boost

A planned research and development center focused on sustainable aviation… Continue reading

Helion's 6th fusion prototype, Trenta, on display on Tuesday, July 9, 2024 in Everett, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Helion celebrates smoother path to fusion energy site approval

Helion CEO applauds legislation signed by Gov. Bob Ferguson expected to streamline site selection process.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.