Wal-Mart defended its security measures after a fired employee went public Wednesday with allegations of extensive corporate surveillance of the retailer’s critics, consultants and shareholders.
The world’s largest retailer declined to comment on specific allegations made by former security technician Bruce Gabbard, 44, to the Wall Street Journal in a report published Wednesday. Wal-Mart reiterated that it had fired Gabbard and his supervisor last month for violating company policy by recording phone calls and intercepting pager messages.
“Like most major corporations, it is our corporate responsibility to have systems in place, including software systems, to monitor threats to our network, intellectual property and our people,” Wal-Mart spokeswoman Sarah Clark said.
“These situations are limited to cases which are high risk to the company or our associates, such as criminal fraud or security issues,” she said.
Wal-Mart’s union-backed critics, whom Gabbard identified as among the surveillance targets, accused the retailer of being “paranoid, childish and desperate.”
“They should stop playing with spy toys and take the criticism of their business model seriously. The success of the company depends on it,” said Nu Wexler, spokesman for Wal-Mart Watch. According to the Wall Street Journal report, the company found personal photos of Wexler and tracked his plans to attend Wal-Mart’s annual meeting.
Gabbard told the Wall Street Journal he was part of a large, sophisticated surveillance operation by the Threat Research and Analysis Group, a unit of Wal-Mart’s Information Systems Division.
Gabbard was fired after recording phone calls to and from a New York Times reporter and intercepting pager messages.
Gabbard and his former supervisor, Jason Hamilton, have declined repeated Associated Press requests to talk about their security activities.
Gabbard told the Journal he recorded the calls on his own, but added many of his activities were approved by Wal-Mart. The Journal said other employees and security firms confirmed parts of his account.
Clark said she could not comment on Gabbard’s claim of blanket approval because “that’s a pretty broad statement. We wouldn’t be able to comment on that without knowing the details he’s referring to.”
Clark declined to comment on specific allegations.
Talk to us
> Give us your news tips.
> Send us a letter to the editor.
> More Herald contact information.
