Any exam of Sept. 11 should be for learning

Before Sept. 11, America was complacent about a hateful foe.

We can learn lessons from examining our inability to come to grips with a deadly threat before the terrorist attacks that claimed nearly 3,000 lives. The lessons can touch every segment of society, particularly the government. By examining the past, we may find ways to lessen furtue dangers.

Learning, however, can best be accomplished in a calm and objective manner. So far, America seems far from ready to pursue productive discussions about the 9-11 attacks.

The emotional nature of the subject is clear in the headlines speaking of “furor” over the existence of government reports on the al-Qaida threat before Sept. 11. That kind of language means that the discussion is more about pinning blame – perhaps on President Bush, no less – than about finding ways to do better.

It may be that, as a nation, our suffering is still too intense to undertake the kind of distanced evaluation that could prove most valuable. It’s also possible that our political system is so steeped in partisan attack that a serious study cannot be undertaken by elected officials, at least not this soon after Sept. 11. An appointed panel may be the best answer, and maybe that should wait a little longer.

Much of the discussion so far tends to glance over key points that are, nevertheless, being made by many journalists and officials. The threat existed in the Clinton administration as well as the Bush administration, and in both administrations, there were efforts undertaken to deal with al-Qaida. President Clinton authorized missile strikes against terrorist training camps in Afghanistan in 1998; Osama bin Laden may have only escaped narrowly. As the Christian Science Monitors pointed out Monday, the Bush administration had focused on the danger from al-Qaida within its first few weeks in office.

Perhaps it is all the more tragic to realize that more attempts to weaken al-Qaida were under study, but that is reality. It is all 20-20 hindsight to scream about what might have been done, if only more had been done or if something had succeeded in destroying al-Qaida.

It seems wholly proper for government officials and agencies to re-examine their own actions and make changes to tighten security and intelligence, for instance. Much of that has been occurring ever since Sept. 11. Re-examination, though, also involves the public and society generally, including the press. Did any of us take terrorism seriously enough before Sept. 11? To the degree that we were frightened, did we respond effectively?

On Sept. 9, this editorial board wrote about terror threats, but largely in the context of strengthening security on the Canadian border. We suggested that new knowledge gained from questioning Ahmed Ressam, convicted in a terror plot after being arrested at Port Angeles, “will help European and U.S. authorities head off any number of plots here, in Europe and elsewhere.” In hindsight, that assessment was terrifyingly over-optimistic.

We can endlessly kick ourselves – or, more likely, others – for not having been alert enough. Or we can try, as a country, to learn lessons and do better.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

People walk adjacent to the border with Canada at the Peace Arch in Peace Arch Historical State Park, where cars behind wait to enter Canada at the border crossing Monday, Aug. 9, 2021, in Blaine, Wash. Canada lifted its prohibition on Americans crossing the border to shop, vacation or visit, but America kept similar restrictions in place, part of a bumpy return to normalcy from coronavirus travel bans. (AP Photo/Elaine Thompson)
Editorial: U.S. and Canada better neighbors than housemates

President Trump may be serious about annexing Canada, but it’s a deal fraught with complexities for all.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Thursday, Feb. 13

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

State single-payer health care bill offers many advantages

I was excited to read in Will Geschke’s report (“Everett lawmakers back… Continue reading

Important national story missing from Herald

I couldn’t find a report in The Herald that the Trump administration… Continue reading

Comment: Trump’s ‘Man-of-Steel’ shtick will make U.S. weaker

Trump’s 25 percent tariffs on steel and aluminum will harm allies we need and won’t help industries here.

Comment: AG Bondi’s DEI memo more messaging than lawsuit threat

Talk of criminal investigations is intended to panic corporations into abandoning their DEI programs.

Goldberg: Why Musk, Vance went to bat for self-desribed racist

While a former Trump official is on the outs for doing his job, a proud racist gets his job back.

CNA Nina Prigodich, right, goes through restorative exercises with long term care patient Betty Long, 86, at Nightingale's View Ridge Care Center on Friday, Feb. 10, 2023 in Everett, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Boost state Medicaid funding for long-term care

With more in need of skilled nursing and assisted-living services, funding must keep up to retain staff.

bar graph, pie chart and diagrams isolated on white, 3d illustration
Editorial: Don’t let state’s budget numbers intimidate you

With budget discussions starting soon, a new website explains the basics of state’s budget crisis.

Curtains act as doors for a handful of classrooms at Glenwood Elementary on Monday, Sept. 9, 2024 in Lake Stevens, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Schools’ building needs point to election reform

Construction funding requests in Arlington and Lake Stevens show need for a change to bond elections.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, Feb. 12

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Welch: State Democrats’ bill would undermine parental rights

The bill would allow kids as young as 13 to make mental health decisions without notice to parents.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.