Appeals the only thing wrong with death penalty

Guilty on all counts.

That was the verdict rendered in the case of the two murdered young women — one of whom was my nephew’s wife — I recently wrote about.

Stacey Ian Humphreys, 34, has now been sentenced to death by lethal injection on two counts of murder with malice. He also received several life sentences without the chance of parole on the other counts with which he’d been charged.

When my sister called to tell me of the verdict and sentencing, she sounded as if a great burden had been lifted from her shoulders.

Too, perhaps now, my nephew can close a chapter of his life that’s taken four long years to get through.

As for the trial, after all of the delays, the defense basically ended up arguing for mitigating circumstances in an attempt to lighten the load that was about to finally come down on their client.

He’d been abused as a child. He had memory lapses and couldn’t remember the murders. He had problems with … and so forth and so on.

My sister told me that the only time that he showed any emotion throughout the entire trial was during a recess. That was when he broke down because his daily routine in jail had been disrupted by the trial.

One of the appalling things that came out during the trial was the fact that he’d forced both young women to disrobe during the robbery and before the murders. This was because he’d read somewhere “that women could be controlled by making them undress during a robbery.” In the end, however, even though they did everything he asked and put up no resistance, he still cold-bloodedly killed them both.

Whatever problems Stacey Ian Humphreys had during his life, they apparently had nothing to do with planning.

The reason for the robbery?

He needed money to make a payment on his truck. (Momentary pause to allow this writer to calm down.)

Now that the trial is over and a death penalty has been given, though, an automatic appeals process begins.

I admit that there are times when I lean away from the death penalty. When I do, however, it’s not because I think that such a penalty is either barbaric or immoral. Nor do I think that the imposition and carrying out of the death penalty “lowers” society to the same level as the accused.

Rather, when I have these second thoughts, it’s usually because of the seemingly endless appeals process, the costs involved, and the prolongation of the pain for the victim’s family. That said, I do believe there are cases wherein the death penalty is both very appropriate and necessary.

Stacey Ian Humphreys humiliated, terrified, robbed, and then killed two young women who’d done nothing more than go to work on an otherwise normal day. He did this in order to make a truck payment. Forget working more hours or taking a second job to cover the expenses he’d voluntarily incurred. Forget personal responsibility. Hell, forget anything that spoke of standing on his own two feet and handling his problems like an adult. Instead, he destroyed the lives of two young women and put two families through the agonies of the damned.

This was a crime that, as the father of one of the young women said, “deserved a terrible punishment.”

Is the death penalty appropriate here?

You bet it is.

It’s appropriate on the grounds that he wantonly took two lives. It’s appropriate on the grounds that there’s no doubt in anyone’s mind that he committed this crime. It’s also appropriate because it would be an insult to the victims’ families to have some part of their taxes used for the care and feeding of this individual.

I don’t think of the death penalty as a deterrent. Frankly, I don’t care if it is or not. What I do believe is that it is a just way of ensuring that no future harm can come to anyone (including inmates and guards) at the hands of this individual.

Finally, if there were an express lane for appeals, I’d hope that Stacey Ian Humphreys would be moved to the head of that line because the sooner he’s sent to his final judgment, the better.

And if one day I have to explain myself to my creator on that last, I’ll do so without any equivocation, fear, or misgivings whatsoever.

Stacey Ian Humphreys. Murderer.

May he and all others like him rot in hell.

Larry Simoneaux lives in Edmonds. Comments can be sent to: larrysim@att.net

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Friday, Oct. 4

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Vote 2024 logo with red and blue text for US presidential election. Election sticker, badge, label, poster, banner, greeting card. Stars and USA flag red strips Vector illustration.
Editorial: Heck a champion for better discourse, government

The former state legislator and member of Congress works for civil debate and good governance.

Schwab: We know who Trump, Harris are; rest is up to voters

Not that it’s kept Trump from calling Harris ‘mentally impaired’ and accusing her of murder.

Please heed yield sign before U.S. 2 trestle

I am at my wits’ end. Maybe you can help get the… Continue reading

Superior Court judge: Rivera experienced, respected

Voting for a judge is a daunting task. The judicial canons, a… Continue reading

Americans need to wake to reality of presidential race

My overwhelming feeling when watching the recent presidential debate was disbelief that… Continue reading

Comment: Quickening pace of clean energy growth is good news

If you need an example of technology’s advances, consider the microchip and its exponential improvements.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Thursday, Oct. 3

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Superior Court judge: Rivera has support of local jurists

We are retired judges and are writing to express our support for… Continue reading

10th LD, Pos. 1: Shavers proved himself in first term

Clyde Shavers worked very hard at being a state representative for the… Continue reading

Presidential race: Answer is yes, we’re better off now

The Trump folks ask: “Are you better off now than you were… Continue reading

French: With wink to MAGA, Vance plays nice for veep debate

When it counted, however, the mask slipped and Vance couldn’t admit the events of Jan. 6, 2021.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.