‘Baseline’ cuts actually increases

The term “baseline budgeting” is a term used by our government to describe how money is budgeted each year for financial programs. It sounds pretty straightforward and that’s just what our politicians want you to believe. The history of baseline budgeting goes way back to the 1970s and had good intentions at the time. But over the subsequent years the politicians have changed it to their own advantage, both Republicans and Democrats. If you Google the words “baseline budgeting” you will find many explanations of how it works. But I will save you the time and try to give you a simple example of how it works.

Baseline budgeting uses phrases like “cuts” and “increases” in a way that easily deceives the average voter. To the unaware voter a 10 percent “cut” to a $100 billion program sounds like next year’s budget for that program will be “cut” by $10 billion. That program would have a budget of $90 billion dollar, right? Wrong! Baseline budgeting has built into it yearly “increases” based on a number of factors: projected inflation and increased revenues to name a few. This “increase” is usually between 7 and 10 percent. So with a 10 percent “increase,” the budget for the $100 billion program next year will be $110 billion. So when the politicians propose a “cut” of 10 percent they are applying that “cut” to the 10 percent “increase” not the total budget.

So the budget for this program for next year with a 10 percent “cut” is going to be $109 billion. Not a “cut” but an “increase” of $9 billion of your hard earned dollars! Get the picture? The deception is all in the wording. Always ask yourself: “a percentage of what, a percent of the increase or a percent of the total budget”? Never in a hundred years can we balance our budget with deceptive bookkeeping like this.

Dave Green

Mukilteo

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Friday, Nov. 14

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Editorial: Welcome guidance on speeding public records duty

The state attorney general is advancing new rules for compliance with the state’s public records law.

Schwab: Democratic Party was caught between caving and caring

Those who ended the shutdown ended the challenge but restored vital benefits, because Democrats care.

A state income tax is fair and can fund our needs

The constant tug-of-war between raising taxes and cutting spending is maddening. The… Continue reading

Thanks to Mukilteo voters for their support of EMS levy

We want to extend our sincere gratitude to the residents of Mukilteo… Continue reading

What if a president abused executive powers?

I hear by the news that Learning Resources Inc. v Trump has… Continue reading

Comment: Epstein is an unreliable narrator; but then so is Trump

This week’s release of emails raises concerns and doubts that need a fuller disclosure to get to the truth.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Thursday, Nov. 13

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Stephens: Antisemitism on right is nothing new; nor tolerable

William F. Buckley tried to beat it back twice. More conservatives need to step up to shut it down.

Harrop: It’s not votes or GOP support Trump seeks; it’s profit

Not even a year into his second term, Trump now is motivated by what others can do for him personally.

Brooks: A theory as to how Trump and others see themselves

A look at what’s behind the thinking of authoritarians and how they use that to order their worlds.

Comment: Red states may rue decision to gerrymander districts

The GOP weakened some seats to gain an advantage in others, but its 2024 coalition of voters may not hold.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.