Bin Laden is just the tip of the iceberg

President Bush and the citizens of the free world face a monumental challenge in responding to terrorism. Whether or not Osama bin Laden is the mastermind behind Tuesday’s atrocities does not really matter. Bin Laden is merely the tip of an unspeakable iceberg.

There are dozens of radical Moslem groups including Islamic Jihad and Hezbollah which already consider themselves at war with the United States, all of whom find our misery thrilling. Most of them cooperate with one another.

Benjamin Netanyahu, the former Israeli Prime Minister, points out that the people of freedom-loving countries are already at war with radical Islam, and that several Islamic countries are currently developing nuclear and biological weapons, which they will use on American cities as soon as they are available.

Netanyahu is right. Either we defeat terrorism, or we die. That’s the choice we face – an easy one, for most Americans. What is not so easy is our response: we must eliminate the capacity of terrorists to deliver mass destruction.

That is not so simple. It involves much more than a few air strikes against bin Laden’s bases in the Afghan mountains, or even leveling Kabul, or Kandahar. We must also eliminate nuclear weapons research in a host of countries, including Iraq, Syria, Iran and others, and wipe out enough of their military capacity to keep ourselves and our allies safe.

The Moslem lunatic fringe wants to kill us all, and will do so if an when they get the capacity. We must not forget that.

Removing the threat of radical Islam will not be quick, and may need to repeated every so often – like pruning a noxious weed. The details will be extremely unpleasant, to us and to our enemies. We will lose a lot of soldiers, sailors and airmen. We may suffer further terrorist attacks on American soil. But any lesser response will risk the destruction of our civilization.

After my own military service, during Vietnam, I pledged that I would never let any of my children be used as “cannon fodder” in a pointless war. But I can no longer say that. The stakes are too high. We must all be willing to serve and sacrifice in whatever way necessary to bring our “holy war” against terrorism to a successful and just conclusion.

Everett

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Monday, Jan. 19

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

FILE - In this Aug. 28, 1963 file photo, the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., head of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, speaks to thousands during his "I Have a Dream" speech in front of the Lincoln Memorial for the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom, in Washington. A new documentary “MLK/FBI,” shows how FBI director J. Edgar Hoover used the full force of his federal law enforcement agency to attack King and his progressive, nonviolent cause. That included wiretaps, blackmail and informers, trying to find dirt on King. (AP Photo/File)
Editorial: King would want our pledge to nonviolent action

His ‘Letter from a Birmingham Jail’ outlines his oath to nonviolence and disruptive resistance.

The Rev. Martin Luther King Jr., left, appears at a Chicago news conference with Buddhist monk Thich Nhat Hanh on May 31, 1966. AP Photo/Edward Kitch, File
Comment: In continuing service to King’s ‘beloved community’

A Buddhist monk and teacher who built a friendship with King, continued his work to realize the dream.

Forum: Continuing Dr. King’s work requires a year-round commitment

We can march and honor his legacy this weekend, but we should strive for his dream every day.

Comment: History’s warnings about those who cling to power

More than 65 years ago, a rift between civil rights leaders might have ended the movement itself.

Stephens: Iran’s leaders falling to their own antisemitism

The regime would rather pursue a perpetual jihad against Israel and Jews than feed its own people.

Lozada: Two questions podcasters, moderators should stop asking

How did we get to the point where ‘How did we get here?’ seemed a useful way to start a discussion?

A Microsoft data center campus in East Wenatchee on Nov. 3. The rural region is changing fast as electricians from around the country plug the tech industry’s new, giant data centers into its ample power supply. (Jovelle Tamayo / The New York Times)
Editorial: Meeting needs for data centers, fair power rates

Shared energy demand for AI and ratepayers requires an increased pace for clean energy projects.

Tina Ruybal prepares ballots to be moved to the extraction point in the Snohomish County Election Center on Nov. 3, 2025 in Everett, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: A win for vote-by-mail, amid gathering concern

A judge preserved the state’s deadline for mailed ballots, but more challenges to voting are ahead.

Why approval of Everett Schools’ bond, levy is so important

As a former Everett School Board director, I understand public school funding… Continue reading

Welch column: Hopes for state shouldn’t be tall order

I hope that Todd Welch’s dreams for the 2026 Legislature come true… Continue reading

toon
Eitorial cartoons for Sunday, Jan. 18

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.