Build it anywhere but in Seattle

Regarding your Sunday editorial, “A major boost for region”: You are right that investor Chris Hansen has presented Seattle with a very good opportunity. I question the commitment from the community, however. It will please the NBA fans, but my read on the majority of the taxpayers is a “here we go again” attitude. These things seem to always cost more than the overly enthusiastic supporters say it will.

In this case, the traffic issue is being kind of glossed over. The Port of Seattle is very concerned, or seemingly so, but one has to wonder, seeing as how we hardly heard a peep out of them when the first two stadiums were built. My guess is the port will take this opportunity to push the city, county and state for more traffic fixes. And that is where the taxpayer comes in. A solution for traffic in the area is going to be expensive, and Seattle has already failed in its commitment for its share of the money needed for the first two stadiums, as far as traffic fixes.

This arena is not going to be self-funded, as hyped. The arena itself, yes, but the rest of the costs, mainly access and egress, will be on the taxpayer dime, well disguised as an economic issue benefiting the whole state.

Our tax dollars don’t need to be spent on playpens for millionaires. The average family cannot even afford to go to these games.

My solution? Build it where access and egress are not such an issue. Probably on the east side of Lake Washington. As a matter of fact, I believe that I read that the majority of the fans live on the Eastside.

Seattle will go apoplectic, of course. Their delusions of “world class” would be shattered, but I believe that an arena could be built for a lot less almost anyplace else. Getting to and from the games will be much easier, even for Seattleites. We can still get whatever economic benefits these things provide and it will not cost us near as much and I doubt that Chris Hansen cares where, as much as he cares about getting approval and financial help, period.

A huge win for the region, you bet, but not in Seattle. We should have learned our lesson by now in that regard.

Don Curtis

Clinton

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Thursday, May 15

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Sarah Weiser / The Herald
Air Force One touches ground Friday morning at Boeing in Everett.
PHOTO SHOT 02172012
Editorial: There’s no free lunch and no free Air Force One

Qatar’s offer of a 747 to President Trump solves nothing and leaves the nation beholden.

Comment: Governor should veto change to mortgage interest deduction

A provision in state tax legislation would increase mortgage costs for families buying homes.

Comment: Fair’s fair; kids get 3 dolls, Trump wants 3 jets

Trump’s tariffs require austerity from Americans, except when Trump sees a shinier aircraft on the tarmac.

Comment: Welcome South African refugees, yes, but Afghans, too

There has been no good explanation why Afrikaners are admitted, when so many others are turned away.

Goldberg: Is RFK Jr.’s MAHA movement suffering irony deficiency

His pick for surgeon general is faltering because she isn’t attacking vaccines earnestly enough.

Comment: Nonprofits filling gap left by federal cuts isn’t answer

Relying solely on donors to fulfill needs means providers no longer are accountable to the people.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, May 14

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

The Washington State Legislature convenes for a joint session for a swearing-in ceremony of statewide elected officials and Governor Bob Ferguson’s inaugural address, March 15, 2025.
Editorial: 4 bills that need a second look by state lawmakers

Even good ideas, such as these four bills, can fail to gain traction in the state Legislature.

Welch: Local elections work best when voters prepare for task

With ballots set, now’s the time to study issues and ask candidates where they stand and what they’ll do.

Comment: U.S., China had no choice but to seek tariff offramp

Neither will admit market forces and public opinion aren’t with them. A 90-day pause was the best option.

Harrop: Lack of SALT deal could doom GOP’s ‘big, beautiful bill’

A handful of Republicans, concerned for their seats, want a tax deduction key to high-tax blue states

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.