Burke; Years ago, even workers ignored safety; be glad for change

Now if we can get industries — like Amazon — and judges to recognize the need for workplace safety.

By Tom Burke / Herald Columnist

A worker safety lawsuit brought by Washington state’s Department of Labor and Industry (L&I) against Amazon was dismissed earlier this month by Judge Stephen Pfeifer of the Board of Industrial Insurance Appeals.

L&I had cited the company for setting productivity targets that risked hurting employees; alleging 10-hour shifts with mandatory overtime and a rapid work pace that put workers at risk of injuring their backs, shoulders, wrists and knees.

Amazon said, “Washington L&I’s allegations are inaccurate and don’t reflect the reality of safety at Amazon,” Amazon claimed.

And while this judge apparently agreed with Amazon, L&I says it will appeal.

What’s got me conflicted here is part of me says investigate the job before you take it, then if you don’t like the conditions, leave.

But that sounds so 19th-century and company-centric and ignores the contributions of a dedicated workforce. And workers, asking for reasonable accommodations, got us the eight-hour day, the 40-hour week, paid holidays and vacations, the end of child labor, and a whole lot more.

Now as I was reading I recalled my safety “experiences” when I did more “work” than pound a computer keyboard that, while making good stories now, in retrospect, makes me shudder.

Back in the day I was an ironworker in New York City, working (occasionally) on high steel but mostly doing rebar, the iron rods that reinforce poured concrete.

It was hard work, humping big bundles of 20- to 60-foot-long steel rods (from the size of a fat pencil to the diameter of a silver dollar) into place and tying them together. And there was always a foreman watching to insure productivity, as the hourly rate was nominally high.

Tying slab was the toughest. All day, every day, after we’d laid out, say, 6,000 squarefeet of floor with rods crossing every 6 inches, you stooped over and tied every place where two rods crossed. It was a lot of ties.

But it was nominally safe as we labored on a plywood deck.

Not so when prepping beams for asbestos fire-proofing. Especially if you were a “new mickey” (first timer).

‘Cause if you’d never worked up high (my first tall building was a project adjacent to the Brooklyn Bridge) they sent you out to the very edge of a 9-inch wide beam, 35 floors above the pavement, to secure chicken wire all around the beam. There were a lot of beams.

No one wore a safety harness. Or a hard hat. Or anything else but sturdy shoes, Carhartts, and a T-shirt.

And ‘bout the only safety training we got was, “Don’t look down,” and maybe some kind soul would show you how to shinny out to the edge on your fanny, until you worked up enough courage to actually walk upright on the steel.

Clearly, by today’s standards, such a work environment would have everyone, from the union shoppies, to company risk managers, to the local L&Is screaming, “NO, NO, NO!” at the tops of their lungs.

But back then we didn’t complain, it was just the way it was.

Like with our hard hats.

They weren’t mandatory until one bright summer day, while rebuilding New York City’s passenger ship piers over the Hudson River, the foreman handed everyone a nice, new, green hard hat.

Which we promptly tossed into the Hudson, floating them down, inverted, to the Statue of Liberty.

We did the same with the replacements the next day.

Now the third round of hats was accompanied with a note saying “No hat, two paychecks on Friday (meaning you were being fired). And like magic we all started wearing hard hats!

And on those piers, seeing the water rushing under the beams we were walking on, made us dizzy and disoriented. And without safety harnesses we all feared a plunge into the river. But again, no complaints, it was work. Besides, I was used to water and heights.

Because when in the Merchant navy I transited the Pacific, from Panama to Brisbane, in a bosun’s chair (a wood plank held up by some old rope) hoisted atop the cargo booms recording the serial numbers of every block on the ship (Farrell Lines’ Austral Pilot) or pounding new numbers into ‘em with a maul and die. (The Aussie “L&I” people were way ahead of us and very strict about workers’ safety even back in 1969. They wanted safety certificates for every one of those hundreds of blocks aboard.)

Again, no harness or hard hat; just me up there, alone, roooolling as the ship rolled, repeating the primary safety rule: “One hand for you; One hand for the ship.”

Things are different today.

Thank god, the unions, and L&I.

Because while complaining about a job after you’ve taken it seems a bit ungracious, if you aren’t looking out for your own safety, it’s not likely the bosses will.

Washington state has one of the lowest workplace fatalities rates in the nation; but is among the highest in terms of worker illness and injury. (Note: not because we’re inherently unsafe — experts say it’s because this state is so strict in reporting such data; has a unique, and accurate, reporting system; and other states and companies deliberately under-report [lie about] their data.)

Consumers like Amazon’s next-day delivery. Investors like its profitability.

And neither really cares about how such convenience and profits are “delivered.”

They should.

So let me gently suggest one of Amazon’s mottos, “Work hard, have fun, make history” maybe should be amended to, “Work hard, work safe, have fun, make history.” (And money?)

Slava Ukraini.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, July 2

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) speaks during a news conference at the U.S. Capitol on Friday, June 27, 2025. The sweeping measure Senate Republican leaders hope to push through has many unpopular elements that they despise. But they face a political reckoning on taxes and the scorn of the president if they fail to pass it. (Kent Nishimura/The New York Times)
Editorial: GOP should heed all-caps message on tax policy bill

Trading cuts to Medicaid and more for tax cuts for the wealthy may have consequences for Republicans.

Burke: Assessing dangers to democracy, knowing how to respond

In judging a threat consider Trump’s intent and his ability to carry out his intentions.

Oppose passage of ‘Big Beautiful Bill’ in Congress

The so-called “Big Beautiful Bill” threatens half of America’s children. (“Medicaid cuts… Continue reading

Stand up to oppose cuts to Medicaid and more

I am a senior citizen, having believed for the years of my… Continue reading

Skip the private fireworks displays, please

As everyone knows, our great country’s birthday, The Fourth of July, is… Continue reading

Comment: ‘Big Beautiful Bill’ will be hard sell to public

Republicans now must explain its cuts to health coverage, SNAP and clean energy credits and additional debt.

Alaina Livingston, a 4th grade teacher at Silver Furs Elementary, receives her Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 vaccine at a vaccination clinic for Everett School District teachers and staff at Evergreen Middle School on Saturday, March 6, 2021 in Everett, Wa. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: RFK Jr., CDC panel pose threat to vaccine access

Pharmacies following newly changed CDC guidelines may restrict access to vaccines for some patients.

Making adjustments to keep Social Security solvent represents only one of the issues confronting Congress. It could also correct outdated aspects of a program that serves nearly 90 percent of Americans over 65. (Stephen Savage/The New York Times) -- NO SALES; FOR EDITORIAL USE ONLY WITH NYT STORY SLUGGED SCI SOCIAL SECURITY BY PAULA SPAN FOR NOV. 26, 2018. ALL OTHER USE PROHIBITED.
Editorial: Congress must act on Social Security’s solvency

That some workers are weighing early retirement and reduced benefits should bother members of Congress.

In this Sept. 2017, photo made with a drone, a young resident killer whale chases a chinook salmon in the Salish Sea near San Juan Island, Wash. The photo, made under a National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) permit, which gives researchers permission to approach the animals, was made in collaboration with NOAA Fisheries/Southwest Fisheries Science Center, SR3 Sealife Response, Rehabilitation, and Research and the Vancouver Aquarium's Coastal Ocean Research Institute. Endangered Puget Sound orcas that feed on chinook salmon face more competition from seals, sea lions and other killer whales than from commercial and recreational fishermen, a new study finds. (John Durban/NOAA Fisheries/Southwest Fisheries Science Center via AP)
Editorial: A loss for Northwest tribes, salmon and energy

The White House’s scuttling of the Columbia Basin pact returns uncertainty to salmon survival.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, July 1

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Dowd: Trump obliterates any sense of reliance on facts, truth

Any attempt to set the record straight is met with charges of having a lack of respect and patriotism.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.