Clearer picture needed to justify transit tax hike

Everett Transit is at a crossroads. After years of bitter wrangling with Community Transit over a possible merger, suffering the fallout of tax-cut initiatives and other revenue losses, the agency is running out of money. Without a sales tax increase of 0.3 cents on the dollar, city officials say, ET will be broke by next summer. Cuts to service will be immediate and severe.

Such cuts would hit hardest on people who dont have cars or are disabled and cant get around town to their jobs, school or errands. Our community benefits from all its citizens being able to be productive at work, school and local activities and events. Stories from riders whose lives have benefited greatly from the citys Paratransit services emphasize the need for it. We know they are not merely emotional appeals. They are valid, real-life concerns.

As the citys population grows and creative economic development initiatives bear fruit, the need to move people from one end of town to the other will be critical. And a convenient, smartly run transit system will be an important to businesses looking to locate here.

All these reasons and more might make a decision on Proposition 1 an easy one for many Everett residents. But despite some cost-cutting moves on the part of Everett Transit, this editorial board isnt convinced that the agency has made every effort to streamline operations and cut costs before coming to taxpayers for more money. We therefore cannot support a tax increase at this time.

We also question the decision not to raise fares first. It wouldnt have solved all the agencys problems, but it would have helped. Further, we are disappointed the city chose to ask voters for a sales tax increase before mapping out a plan for negotiating with the transit agencys unions in December 2005. It appears the tax increase would keep and restore some service, but its unclear whether it will pay for new projects or ideas the agency may develop as the city grows. That leaves the prospect of another tax-hike request down the road.

The issue of how ET can work with Community Transit to reduce costs and provide good service is still unanswered after all these years and thats unacceptable.

The timing for this tax proposal is rushed. The absence of a clear, long-term plan for ET is evidence that more work needs to be done before a tax increase is warranted.

Getting an organization turned around involves a combination of difficult steps, painful decisions and clear communication of long-range goals before asking citizens for an infusion of money. Everett Transit has made financial strides the past several months, but were not convinced theyve turned every stone.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

Editorial: A win for vote-by-mail, amid gathering concern

A judge preserved the state’s deadline for mailed ballots, but more challenges to voting are ahead.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, Jan. 13

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Support of Everett schools’ bond, levy shapes student success

As a proud parent of daughters who began their Everett Public Schools… Continue reading

New pharmacy at Everett clinic site will aid patients

I applaud our local pharmacist Sovit Bista for opening Robin Hood Pharmacy… Continue reading

Goldberg: ICE killing of Renee Good meant as message for us all

Civil rights, not just of immigrants, but of all Americans are being curtailed. Protest no longer is protected speech.

Comment: DOJ’s voter info demand a data breach waiting to happen

A centralized database of sensitive information is prone to abuse, theft and human error.

Kristof: In Venezuela, Trump trades rule of law for rule of oil

Its socialist government, which lost the last election, remains in power; as long as it bends to Trump.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Monday, Jan. 12

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

FILE - The sun dial near the Legislative Building is shown under cloudy skies, March 10, 2022, at the state Capitol in Olympia, Wash. An effort to balance what is considered the nation's most regressive state tax code comes before the Washington Supreme Court on Thursday, Jan. 26, 2023, in a case that could overturn a prohibition on income taxes that dates to the 1930s. (AP Photo/Ted S. Warren, File)
Editorial: No new taxes, but maybe ‘pay as we go’ on some needs

New taxes won’t resolve the state’s budget woes, but more limited reforms can still make a difference.

Comment: Supreme Court readies lifeline for House Republicans

A final gutting of the Voting Rights Act could swing districts to the GOP at all election levels

Comment: Europe must prepare for Trump’s plans for Greenland

The vast northern island may not be next on Trump’s list, but his threats and U.S. might provide an inside track.

Comment: Don’t punish Illinois, other states for Minnesota’s fraud

The withholding of funding of social programs looks suspiciously partisan and particularly unfair.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.