Comment: Can’t let pundits’ rabid defense of global trade war pass

By Matt K. Lewis / Los Angeles Times

In the wake of reciprocal tariffs landing with all the finesse of a cannonball dive into a hot tub, President Trump decided to pause them temporarily for most countries (while raising China’s tariffs to 145%).

The problem? This past week Trump’s army of talking heads and Twitter commandos has pushed his “no pain, no gain” theory like it was the Sermon on the Mount, all while insisting this was the economic tough love America needed. So while Trump struts around declaring victory, as if this whole thing was a masterclass in geopolitical brinkmanship and not a half-baked tantrum, his loyal foot soldiers are left twisting in the wind; on record, parroting laughable justifications for an industrial policy plan their guy now clearly doesn’t have the guts, or attention span, to complete.

I’ve got the receipts. And before these painfully awkward justifications get quietly shuffled off to the great memory hole where bad takes go to die, allow me to immortalize a few of the more inspired defenses that were trotted out to sell this mess.

Let’s begin with Jesse Watters — Fox News’ enthusiastic golden retriever in a blazer — who earnestly declared that “the tariffs are for the children.”

It’s the last refuge of a scoundrel; apparently, we’re supposed to think of tariffs as a kind of noble sacrifice, like planting a tree you’ll never sit under, only with less shade and more inflation. “Here you go, Jimmy — I made your Legos cost 30 percent more, so you can grow up strong, patriotic and perpetually broke.”

Fox News co-host Jeanine Pirro skipped worrying about the children and went straight to not worrying about her retirement account, saying, “I don’t care about my 401(k) today. … I believe this man.” The implication seems to be that the Dow Jones should run on vibes and unshakeable devotion.

Well, good for you, Judge. Just hope your Uber Eats app accepts spiritual currency, because blind faith doesn’t cover mozzarella sticks.

Likewise, Ainsley Earhardt of “Fox & Friends” endorsed the notion that we should just trust in Trump. “Give him some time. He’s a billionaire. He knows what he’s doing,” she said. This is the classic American logic loop: Rich people are smart because they’re rich, and they’re rich because they’re smart.

Now, maybe you’re thinking that their blind faith in Trump has actually been vindicated. After all, Trump might have gotten close to the edge, but he backed away before catastrophic damage occurred. Check out the stock and bond markets, though. And look at our relationships with other nations around the world. Damage has already been done.

This brings us to some of the other lines of argument that were bandied about.

Right-wing podcaster Benny Johnson tried to put a Zen spin on the economic freefall, saying, “Nobody ever had their net worth carved onto their tombstone.” Johnson also channeled your favorite hippie aunt, claiming that money is just “digital ones and zeroes,” man.

Sure. Right up until the ones in your bank account run out and the zeroes get tacked onto your rent bill.

And then there’s Fox Business’ Larry Kudlow — once a proud free trader, now just another guy huffing Trump fumes — saying, “Buying cheap goods is not a real prosperity.” You know what else isn’t prosperity, Larry? Telling working people to pay more for socks while billionaires get tax breaks and bailouts.

And who could forget the Fox News caption “Trump’s Manly Tariffs” that popped on screen during a segment in which Watters asserted that “When you sit behind a screen all day it makes you a woman.” Which is a weird flex coming from a guy who literally gets paid to sit behind a screen all day. In makeup. Also … what’s wrong with being a woman?

And just when you think the excuses couldn’t get any crazier, the weirdest theory (which Trump shared on social media!) alleged that the president was intentionally crashing the economy to lower interest rates so we can refinance our debt; a sort of 4D chess-meets-psychotic break.

I’m not even sure I fully understand how this was supposed to work, because this sort of delusional thinking usually only emerges after you watch “ The Producers” on mushrooms.

Taken together, these various Trumpian hot takes weren’t serious rationalizations; they were desperate attempts to throw rhetorical spaghetti at the wall and hope something sticks.

They could all coexist in the same swirl of chaos — belief over logic, loyalty over evidence, vibes over value — what Rush Limbaugh used to call a “phony-baloney plastic banana good-time rock-and-roll” kind of thing. It was like a “Choose Your Own Adventure” book, until Trump decided it was time for the story to end (or, at least, pause).

Trump’s specialty isn’t policy; it’s performance art. Just remember that the next time something like this happens. (Hint: We could all be doing this again in 90 days; when Trump’s tariff “pause” expires.)