Comment: Congress close to deal to expand child tax credit

The expansion isn’t as generous as an earlier credit, but it will help families with basic expenses.

By Natasha Pilkauskas and Katherine Michelmore / For The Conversation

Influential lawmakers have struck a deal that could increase the extent to which low-income U.S. families can benefit from the child tax credit for three years. The Conversation asked Natasha Pilkauskas and Katherine Michelmore, public policy researchers at the University of Michigan, to explain what may change and why.

Why does Congress want to expand the child tax credit?

The child tax credit, first enacted in 1997, was originally designed to help middle-class families with the costs of raising kids by giving them and upper-class families a tax credit of $400 per child.

After several changes, this credit grew to as much as $2,000. Then the government temporarily expanded the credit in two main ways for the 2021 tax year.

Families could get up to $3,600 for each child, and nearly all low-income families could obtain it. In addition, half of this money was disbursed in monthly payments in the second half of 2021.

In 2022, the credit reverted to its previous terms, in accordance with the tax reform package that President Donald Trump signed into law in late 2017.

The maximum credit is currently worth $2,000. Families must earn at least $2,500 to claim any credit, but their earnings must be higher to get the full credit. For example, a family with two children must earn at least about $40,000 to receive the full $4,000 in child tax credits. Families with three or more children have to earn even more to get the full benefits.

What could change this time?

A bipartisan group of House and Senate lawmakers agreed on Jan. 16, to expand the credit again. If Congress passes the $33 billion measure and President Biden signs it into law, the credit would still be smaller than the 2021 version, and it would not be available to all low-income families.

The new proposal would adjust the earnings requirements. These changes would make it easier for many lower-income families — those earning roughly between $10,000 and $50,000 — to get the full credit. These families would get an average credit that is about $1,130 higher than in 2022.

Families with higher incomes will also see larger benefits in future years if this expansion is passed, because the credit would be indexed to inflation to help families keep pace with rising expenses.

Unlike the 2021 expansion, which gave families monthly checks for six months, this credit would come only at tax time as a lump sum.

The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities projects that this policy would boost benefits for 16 million kids. That’s more than 1 in 5 of the nation’s 72 million children.

Families who would not otherwise have to file their taxes will need to do so to claim the child tax credit. In our own research, we found that almost 25 percent of lower-income families didn’t receive any of the monthly child tax credits, perhaps because they didn’t file their taxes.

For parents who worked in 2023 and have kids younger than 17 who live with them, it may be worth filing taxes in 2024.

What’s the rationale for this expansion?

Raising children can be very expensive.

Consider a mother who is working year-round in a full-time, minimum-wage job who has two kids. Assuming she earns the federal minimum wage of $7.25 an hour, she would earn just over $15,000 each year. Once she pays her rent, food and utility bills, she likely has very little money left for other important expenses like child care or school fees.

For this woman, getting a bigger check at tax time could really help her make ends meet. This new plan would nearly double her child tax credit from about $1,875 to $3,600.

There’s also widespread support to expand the child tax credit because the 2021 child tax credit lifted 3 million children out of poverty.

Many researchers, including us, have found that most families with low incomes spent the 2021 credit on bills, rent, food and clothing.

We also determined that the expanded child tax credit made parents less anxious and depressed.

Who wants this expansion to go into effect?

In the past, bipartisan coalitions have voted to expand the child tax credit. Republicans and Democrats alike have proposed making it more generous over the years.

The current expansion also has bipartisan support, even though progressive lawmakers would have preferred a return to the 2021 version of the credit, which was larger, available to more low-income families and disbursed in monthly installments.

Some conservatives worry that bigger credits make people less likely to work. There’s not much evidence to support that claim.

Instead, there’s ample evidence that the 2021 tax credit expansion didn’t make parents less likely to earn money.

And it’s important to remember that families will still have to work in order to receive any benefit from the child tax credit under this proposal.

How long would this expansion last?

To be clear, there is no guarantee that Congress will approve this measure. It’s part of a larger array of tax changes subject to other partisan battles.

Should Congress pass the tax package and Biden sign it by Jan. 29, American families would be able to claim this expanded credit in 2024 on their 2023 taxes.

Even so, this expansion would be short-lived. The current child tax credit is slated to become smaller after the 2025 tax year unless Congress takes further action. It’s one of the many 2017 tax reforms that will expire in 2026. After that point, the child tax credit will decline to a maximum of $1,000 per child.

Natasha Pilkauskas and Katherine Michelmore are associate professors of public policy at University of Michigan. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Sunday, May 18

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Wildfire smoke builds over Darrington on Friday, Sept. 11, 2020 in Darrington, Wa. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Loss of research funds threat to climate resilience

The Trump administration’s end of a grant for climate research threatens solutions communities need.

In the summer of 2021, members of the Skagit River System Cooperative counted fish in the restored estuary of Leque Island near Stanwood. What they found was encouraging. (Chuck Taylor / The Herald) 20210817
Comment: Ignoring the climate choice to adapt or die

The loss of funding for climate adaptation science will leave regions to weather impacts on their own.

Reverse Congress librarian’s unjust firing

I am beyond heartbroken by the unceremonious firing of Dr. Carla Hayden,… Continue reading

Should states handle issue of immigration?

OK, here we go again. The southern states have been screaming ‘states’… Continue reading

Candidates without opponents should decline donations

No candidates registered to run against Jared Mead or Nate Nehring for… Continue reading

Why does Trump need three 747s?

If children can make do with two dolls instead of 30 while… Continue reading

No doubt about what Trump is doing to nation

There is no doubt about it. The Trump administration is in reality… Continue reading

Among the programs sponsored by Humanities Washington was a Prime Time Family Reading Event at the Granite Falls Sno-Isle Library in March. (Rachel Jacobson)
Comment: Loss of humanities grants robs us of connections

The loss of $10 million in humanities funding in the state diminishes what celebrates human creativity.

Comment: Democrats’ tax plan aimed at ‘villain,’ hit consumers

The governor should veto a B&O tax increase that will hit food prices at stores and restaurants.

Comment: Compare tax choices of 3 states and watch what happens

Idaho and Montana cut their taxes. Washington raised taxes to historic levels. Will an exodus result?

Sarah Weiser / The Herald
Air Force One touches ground Friday morning at Boeing in Everett.
PHOTO SHOT 02172012
Editorial: There’s no free lunch and no free Air Force One

Qatar’s offer of a 747 to President Trump solves nothing and leaves the nation beholden.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.