Comment: Dems’ new plan to catch tax cheats makes more sense

The latest proposal would be focused on bank deposits and withdrawals of wealthier account holders.

By Alexis Leondis / Bloomberg Opinion

One of the most controversial ideas proposed so far in Joe Biden’s presidency has to do with the wonky world of IRS reporting forms. In an effort to ferret out tax cheats, Biden wants banks to tell the IRS at year end what the total amount of withdrawals and deposits were for each of its customers.

In a critical mistake, the initial proposal mandated reporting for just about every account, only excluding those whose total withdrawals or deposits were less than $600. Such a low cutoff (set just to eliminate supposedly dormant accounts) raised an uncomfortable question: If Democrats want to go after wealthy tax evaders, why do they care about people with small bank accounts?

In a revised version outlined by Senate Democrats earlier this week, the cutoff was bumped to $10,000, and sensible exclusions were added for things like direct deposit of wages and Social Security checks. So if a bank customer had $25,000 in total deposits for the year, but $20,000 came from Social Security payments, the bank wouldn’t report her account information to the IRS.

Before the restrictions were introduced, bank lobbyists and other critics of the plan were able to capitalize on fears about how pervasive the new regime would be. It’s a shame the backlash may be too strong at this point, because the overall approach for uncovering those who don’t report all their income is actually one of the most straightforward and unobtrusive ways to do it. First, here’s why some sort of change is needed: Hundreds of billions of dollars owed in taxes go uncollected every year. Many scofflaws are those who have their own small or medium-size businesses and aren’t independently audited.

Unlike those who receive W-2 forms from their employers with wage details (a copy of which is also sent to the IRS), there’s no extra set of eyes. Not surprisingly, when there’s a third-party reporting system in place, tax compliance is around 99 percent. Without it, compliance falls to about half.

Under Biden’s plan, the banks would effectively serve as that third party, providing year-end information that the IRS could in turn use to root out big discrepancies between what someone says she earns and what her bank account flows indicate. Studies show that even just the existence of a new regime could spur more compliance. And it would help the IRS to be smarter about whom it’s auditing.

Critics of the plan, seizing on many Americans’ distrust or dislike of the IRS, characterize it as an unprecedented intrusion of privacy. But that ignores the billions of reporting forms that the IRS already receives on taxpayers’ finances; from the 1099-INT that details how much interest bank accounts accrue to the 1099-B that shows gains or losses from stock sales. It’s simply how our tax system works.

Requiring the banks to include two additional boxes on the interest forms they already send to the IRS — showing withdrawal and deposit totals — won’t move the needle on the information sharing. And while it would certainly entail more work for the IRS, Biden is also seeking an additional $80 billion in funding for the agency. That should help it upgrade its data systems and allay fears of hacks.

The change wouldn’t require most taxpayers to do any additional work. The same can’t be said of another approach that would more narrowly target small businesses.

A plan outlined by a previous presidential panel convened to study tax changes would require small-business owners to designate certain bank accounts as commercial ones. In turn, they would be responsible for reconciling cash flows and reported income.

For their part, Democrats need to be clearer about whom they’re trying to go after with this reporting change. They say they want billionaires and corporations to pay their fair share, but those two groups aren’t the ones who are typically omitting income. They’re taking advantage of loopholes in the tax code to minimize their tax obligations.

That’s different and isn’t something that increasing bank reporting to the IRS is going to change. Still, there are plenty of well-to-do business owners in the top 5 percent who are outright lying on their tax returns. Changing the reporting regime to fix that is something all dutiful taxpayers should want.

Alexis Leondis is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering personal finance. Previously, she oversaw tax coverage for Bloomberg News.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Thursday, March 20

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

A semiautomatic handgun with a safety cable lock that prevents loading ammunition. (Dan Bates / The Herald)
Editorial: Adopt permit-to-purchase gun law to cut deaths

Requiring training and a permit to buy a firearm could reduce deaths, particularly suicides.

Fire District 4 shouldn’t need funding increase through levy

A recent Herald article led its readers to believe Fire District 4… Continue reading

Trump administration should make decisions with evidence, care

The Trump administration has embarked on a path of mindless cutting and… Continue reading

Comment: Roberts had to chastise Trump for threat to judge

Calling for the impeachment of judges over rulings has a long history, and it’s why the chief justice spoke up.

Comment: Anti-vax culture war on mRNA may end up costing lives

False theories are discouraging research and prompting legislation to block valuable vaccines.

Comment: DOGE’s real goal is to privatize government services

And it will be red states and rural areas that will pay more for commercial service for mail and more.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, March 19

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

FILE - The sun dial near the Legislative Building is shown under cloudy skies, March 10, 2022, at the state Capitol in Olympia, Wash. An effort to balance what is considered the nation's most regressive state tax code comes before the Washington Supreme Court on Thursday, Jan. 26, 2023, in a case that could overturn a prohibition on income taxes that dates to the 1930s. (AP Photo/Ted S. Warren, File)
Editorial: One option for pausing pay raise for state electeds

Only a referendum could hold off pay increases for state lawmakers and others facing a budget crisis.

Welch: Lawmakers ignore needs of families with disabled kids

Two bills would have offered financial assistance to families providing home care. Neither survived.

Edmonds should. vote to join South County Fire and Rescue

As a longtime Edmonds resident and retired firefighter of Edmonds Fire District… Continue reading

Save rules that buffer wetlands from homes

It’s not too late! We have a housing crisis and are required… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.