Comment: Environment needs fairer hand in local development

Snohomish County government seems to favor developers over needs of residents, wildlife and woods.

By Jessica Salazar / For The Herald

Just when will the devastation end? Our neighborhoods, our communities and our county deserve more from us at a time when our planet is at a crossroads.

Global warming has given some of us a much-needed climate conscience, for others it continues to fall on deaf ears. For those of us who are not blind to the impacts of the rising temperatures, it is rather easy to follow the science of rising sea levels, more frequent and devastating wildfires, urban flooding and loss of sea and wildlife populations. Sure, these seem like they are global issues, not local ones. However, I can tell you that they start right in our own backyard.

The unfortunate thing about our backyards is that they are also rapidly disappearing. Rampant and unrestrained development by large and small developers are wiping away the things that we hold dear, overwhelming and polluting our rivers, lakes and streams and killing native wildlife. The urban deforestation that has accompanied just about every local development project in the area where I live, seems to have been done without regard for the impact to the environment, increased traffic congestion, surrounding property damage, and increased drainage and runoff to local water sources like Ruggs Lake in my neighborhood.

ADVERTISEMENT
0 seconds of 0 secondsVolume 0%
Press shift question mark to access a list of keyboard shortcuts
00:00
00:00
00:00
 

When these project elements are questioned or challenged, our cries go nowhere. Perhaps it is because developers carry more political influence than the average resident and the cards are stacked in their favor? A simple public disclosure search will yield a pretty clear picture of just how much influence developers have on local politics, and it is troubling to say the least.

Maybe that is why projects keep popping up in areas that don’t have the critical infrastructure to support their success and are given the green light by the county Planning Department to move forward without meeting all of the established requirements that are outlined in the county code. This is where it is apparent that the developers’ reach extends beyond the standard process of apply and comply.

Developers appear to be allowed to continue to proceed with their projects before they have satisfied all permit requirements in advance of their project initiation. This gives them the ability to clear-cut and destroy the very trees and wildlife that the codes are meant to protect. Once the trees are down and the wildlife has disappeared, there is no longer anything to protect and the “no environmental harm,” box can now be checked.

I am concerned about what I will tell my 4- and 8-year-old children when they ask me why there are no longer any eagles, deer, raccoons, coyote, owls or other animals that we often see in our neighborhood. What do I say when they ask why I will not let them play outside of our backyard because of the unsafe increase in traffic on our already busy street? I am sick of the idea of having to explain to my children that despite their best efforts, their voice doesn’t really matter in the conversation if they don’t have the money to buy their seat at the table.

It is no secret that I oppose the Ambleside development that is being build in my neighborhood. The project aims to bring more than 50, three-story homes to a property that is less than four acres in size and currently has three existing single-family residences will completely disrupt our environment and the surrounding properties.

I don’t oppose development or increasing the housing stock in our community, which is desperately needed, but what I do oppose is cramming 50 $750,000 homes onto a piece of property which can barely handle 20 additional units without overwhelming our roads and further polluting the lakes and streams adjacent to the project. This specific project also requires a unique sewer connection that will erode neighboring properties and significantly impact an existing wetland and property owned by the state Department of Transportation.

I want to make it very clear that this is not a NIMBY argument or an argument about property values; it is a concern for our environment, our children and our collective future. It is a concern that is based on science and countless reports that demonstrate the lack of environmental feasibility for this project to satisfy existing code. If we continue to let developers have their way on projects like the Ambleside development without ensuing that the proper checks and balances exist within our county government, then we will all lose. We will lose our trees, our neighborhoods, our wildlife, clean water, and eventually our voice.

So, I pose the question: Who is looking out for us? Is it the developers who fund the Planning and Development Services Department with the fees that they pay to develop? Is it the planning department who relies on those fees to operate, and benefit from expedited project application approvals? Is it the code enforcement division that doesn’t apply code equally to all residents and developers? Or, are we on our own to hold each of these entities accountable to the voters? I know which one I trust, and so far, it’s only the last one.

We need to stand up and ask our elected officials to protect our future and require all developers to complete the entire permit process and be issued all permits prior to initiating any environmental destruction and projects. We need to halt all current developments that have not met these guidelines, and finally we need to be able to access any project that has had a SEPA review challenge until an independent assessment has been conducted on site to verify the impacts outlined in the SEPA. This will also require a “reasonable right of access,” to conduct this review.

At the very least, the proposed Ambleside development should be halted until they have completed every step in the permit process and demonstrated that their project will not negatively impact our precious environment and natural habitats. These are not unreasonable requests and will protect our communities, our neighborhoods, our children, our environment and our planet. It is time we stand together and stop the devastation before its too late. The chains and no trespass sign have now been placed, so time is of the essence. Hopefully our cries don’t fall on deaf ears!

Jessica Salazar lives in Silver Lake.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Thursday, May 15

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Sarah Weiser / The Herald
Air Force One touches ground Friday morning at Boeing in Everett.
PHOTO SHOT 02172012
Editorial: There’s no free lunch and no free Air Force One

Qatar’s offer of a 747 to President Trump solves nothing and leaves the nation beholden.

Comment: Governor should veto change to mortgage interest deduction

A provision in state tax legislation would increase mortgage costs for families buying homes.

Comment: Fair’s fair; kids get 3 dolls, Trump wants 3 jets

Trump’s tariffs require austerity from Americans, except when Trump sees a shinier aircraft on the tarmac.

Comment: Welcome South African refugees, yes, but Afghans, too

There has been no good explanation why Afrikaners are admitted, when so many others are turned away.

Goldberg: Is RFK Jr.’s MAHA movement suffering irony deficiency

His pick for surgeon general is faltering because she isn’t attacking vaccines earnestly enough.

Comment: Nonprofits filling gap left by federal cuts isn’t answer

Relying solely on donors to fulfill needs means providers no longer are accountable to the people.

The Washington State Legislature convenes for a joint session for a swearing-in ceremony of statewide elected officials and Governor Bob Ferguson’s inaugural address, March 15, 2025.
Editorial: 4 bills that need a second look by state lawmakers

Even good ideas, such as these four bills, can fail to gain traction in the state Legislature.

FILE - The sun dial near the Legislative Building is shown under cloudy skies, March 10, 2022, at the state Capitol in Olympia, Wash. An effort to balance what is considered the nation's most regressive state tax code comes before the Washington Supreme Court on Thursday, Jan. 26, 2023, in a case that could overturn a prohibition on income taxes that dates to the 1930s. (AP Photo/Ted S. Warren, File)
Editorial: What state lawmakers acheived this session

A look at some of the more consequential policy bills adopted by the Legislature in its 105 days.

Liz Skinner, right, and Emma Titterness, both from Domestic Violence Services of Snohomish County, speak with a man near the Silver Lake Safeway while conducting a point-in-time count Tuesday, Jan. 23, 2024, in Everett, Washington. The man, who had slept at that location the previous night, was provided some food and a warming kit after participating in the PIT survey. (Ryan Berry / The Herald)
Editorial: County had no choice but to sue over new grant rules

New Trump administration conditions for homelessness grants could place county in legal jeopardy.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, May 14

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Welch: Local elections work best when voters prepare for task

With ballots set, now’s the time to study issues and ask candidates where they stand and what they’ll do.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.