Comment: ‘Forced joy’ is alienating employees and customers

Starbucks baristas must now doodle greetings on cups. It’s the wrong way to win engagement.

By Beth Kowitt / Bloomberg Opinion

Starbucks Corp. baristas have a new job requirement.

In addition to remembering to make your latte with no foam or your cortado with oat milk, they must also write a little missive on your cup. It’s a directive that comes straight from CEO Brian Niccol, who says the handwritten notes foster “moments of connection”; part of his strategy to get more customers into stores to turn around the faltering coffee giant.

In a memo he sent out in January detailing the plan, he had some ideas for those not sure what to say. They could scribble an affirmation (“you’re amazing”), share well wishes (“seize the day”) or simply write a customer’s name or draw a smiley face.

The underlying message to employees is this: It’s not enough to manufacture a product for customers; they must also manufacture a feeling. And if Niccol can’t motivate workers to do so organically, he’ll decree it by edict.

It’s not just Starbucks that has made trumped-up enthusiasm an expectation. Most companies aren’t going as far as the Japanese supermarket chain using an AI system to evaluate and standardize its employees’ smiles, but the trend is clear. Those ending their remote work policies want butts back in seats; and they want employees to be happy about it; at Alphabet Inc., returning Googlers were reminded that office time should be “not only productive but also fun.” At Tiffany & Co., executives required staffers to post and engage more with “Tiffany Joy,” an internal app designed to boost morale. No wonder employees mockingly gave the app a new nickname: Forced Joy.

That could just as easily be the moniker of the era we’re entering. In the age of forced joy, employers are requiring positivity and passion because workers aren’t voluntarily producing a whole lot of either right now. In fact, they don’t like their jobs much at all. A recent Gallup poll found that employee engagement is at a 10-year low; only 39 percent of workers feel that someone cares about them as a person at their company, down from 47 percent in 2020.

The “Great Detachment,” as Gallup has called it, has left the rank and file looking for new jobs at the highest rate since 2015; jobs they can’t get because of a stalled labor market. With power now back in the hands of employers, bosses are doing less cajoling, convincing and negotiating and more demanding. That’s translated into executives thinking the solution to a disengaged workforce is sending out a memo insisting on more engagement.

To be fair, part of work has always been performance. Employees, especially those in the service sector, have long been required to project a certain emotion even when it’s mismatched with how they truly feel. This is what sociologist Arlie Hochschild famously coined as emotional labor; “when seeming to ‘love the job’ becomes part of the job,” as she wrote in her 1983 book “The Managed Heart.” You may recognize it from the cult-famous “pieces of flair” scene in the 1999 movie “Office Space,” where Jennifer Aniston’s character is criticized for failing to contribute to the “fun” atmosphere at the restaurant where she works because she is not wearing enough goofy pins on her uniform. Or more recently, from Apple TV’s “Severance,” where the Macrodata Refinement team is forced to awkwardly groove out during a “Music Dance Experience.” At its most basic, emotional labor is that old classic: service with a smile.

When Hochschild’s book came out some 40 years ago, she surmised that about a third of all jobs required “substantial demands for emotional labor.” But by 2013, she estimated it had grown to about half. Today, it’s likely even higher. As “‘hard skills’ are taken over by robots, emotional labor is the human skill in otherwise digitized, AI-dominant, impersonal environments,” Rose Hackman, the author of “Emotional Labor: The Invisible Work Shaping Our Lives and How to Claim Our Power,” has written.

Niccol does seem to be steering Starbucks toward such a bifurcation. The same week the company’s cup-writing policy went into effect, it cut more than 1,000 corporate jobs and said it would outsource some of its technology work. You cannot contract out connecting with the customer.

But mandated engagement doesn’t particularly work well either. The most fun Starbucks customers and employees actually seem to be having is poking fun at the policy on TikTok. On Reddit, a customer posted that she hates the new policy because “these messages have less meaning” now that they’re required. “It felt special before and now it doesn’t,” read one of the 143 comments in the replies. “Having customers WATCH us be extremely backed up and still having to write something on a cup is so embarrassing,” read another.

The online critics might be onto something. Happy and engaged employees are good for business. But so is creating an environment where workers can effectively do their jobs; and find their own sources of workplace joy. Companies might find if they invest in the latter, the former will organically follow, no faking it required.

Beth Kowitt is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering corporate America. She was previously a senior writer and editor at Fortune Magazine.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, Nov. 26

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Story Corps
Editorial: Political debate isn’t on Thanksgiving menu for most

A better option for table talk are family stories. Share them with the Great Thanksgiving Listen.

Welch: State shouldn’t ease sentences for child sex predators

An advisory panel recommends legislation that would reduce sentences for those caught in predator stings.

Goldberg: A quiet march toward regime change in Venezuela

The Trump administration has less of a case for action against Maduro than it had for war in Iraq.

Comment: One word can get Trump back in climate fight: tariff

A global agreement to impose tariffs on countries that don’t reduce emissions could pressure the U.S.’s return.

Comment: The middle class is shrinking, yet we’re better off

A comparison of incomes between decades show gains for most Americans, even if we’re not feeling it.

Comment: Housing inequality is only going to get worse for now

More homes are being built, but market demand is for homes selling for $750,000 and higher.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, Nov. 25

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Comment: Two ideas that could encourage housing construction

Give all residents of cities that build housing a rebate and ramp up construction of modular homes.

Douthat: Trump’s numbers down again; a rebound isn’t certain

None of Trump’s policies can deliver a quick fix that will impress Americans concerned for their future.

Honks of approval on I-5 for No Kings protest

No Kings protests Honks of approval on I-5 Thanks to everyone who… Continue reading

Comment: Not even Trump’s negotiators can agree on Ukraine plan

A foreign policy of schisms, confusion, arbitrariness threatens peace in Ukraine and elsewhere.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.