Comment: GOP retreat from gay marriage a threat to court ruling

Conservatives have already begun work, as they did with abortion, to overturn the gay marriage ruling.

By Nia-Malika Henderson / Bloomberg Opinion

June marks LGBTQ Pride Month, a time of celebratory parades, parties and rainbow-drenched gatherings all across the country.

This month also marks the 10th anniversary of the Obergefell v. Hodges decision; the landmark U.S. Supreme Court ruling that legalized same-sex marriage in every state. That case, which included several same-sex couples — some with children — ushered in an increased acceptance, visibility, and frankly, comfort level among members of the LGBTQ community and their families.

In subsequent years, the support for marriage equality ticked up among all groups, most starkly among Republicans who for years ran as defenders of traditional marriage, supporting only unions between one man and one woman.

The trend saw Republican support reach 55 percent in May of both 2021 and 2022 — a peak, and up from 37 percent in May 2015 — according to a Gallup poll tracking the party’s alignment with same-sex marriage. But something has shifted in the last few years. As happens with social progress, there has been a concerted and successful backlash to LGBTQ equality, driven by conservatives.

Gallup found a clear erosion in support of same-sex marriage among Republicans, with only 41 percent supporting it today, a 14-point drop in just three years. That decrease dovetails with findings that only 38 percent of Republicans now say same-sex relations are morally acceptable, down from 56 percent in 2022. Overall, 68 percent of Americans support same-sex marriage, including 88 percent of Democrats and 76 percent of independents. The path to that level of acceptance took nearly 30 years; in 1996, when Gallup began tracking, only 27 percent of U.S. adults approved.

But the fight, of course, for LGBTQ equality has stretched far beyond three decades; a struggle marked by courage and persistence. Any sign of backtracking threatens to deny LGBTQ Americans and their families “equal dignity in the eyes of the law,” to quote Justice Anthony Kennedy, who wrote the Obergefell decision.

The downward trend in support should come as no surprise. The war on “woke” specifically targeted LGTBQ people, and not just transgender girls and women who want to play sports. Gay people, their history, traditions, status and culture have been targeted for erasure, whether in the form of book bans or attacks on drag queen story hour.

The Department of Defense erased images that contained “gay” as a keyword in an effort to purge any trace of diversity, equality and inclusion (DEI). Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth reportedly plans to strip gay civil rights leader and Navy veteran Harvey Milk’s name from a ship. Companies such as Target Corp., once willing to dedicate parts of their stores to Pride merchandise, began a retreat last year fearful of conservative backlash. And several companies scaled back or declined to renew their sponsorship of Pride events this year, as my colleague Beth Kowitt wrote.

Buoyed by the overturning of Roe v. Wade, the Southern Baptist Convention voted earlier this month to legally fight to end same-sex marriage, putting the weight of the nation’s largest Protestant denomination behind the effort. Conservative legislators in at least four states, including Michigan and Montana, are pressing the Supreme Court to revisit same-sex marriage, passing resolutions that argue the issue should be left up to states.

The case of Kim Davis — a Kentucky court clerk who refused to issue a gay couple a marriage license over religious grounds — could make its way to the Supreme Court. A Christian legal group, Liberty Counsel, plans to ask the court to hear her case with the aim of overturning Obergefell, which was decided 5-4.

“At least three sitting Supreme Court Justices (which includes Chief Justice Roberts) expressly wrote that the Obergefell opinion has no basis in the Constitution, meaning we have an excellent chance of overturning the case!,” wrote Mat Staver, founder and chairman of the group, in a fundraising letter.

In his 2022 concurring opinion in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, Justice Clarence Thomas wrote that the court, now dominated by conservatives, should reconsider its prior rulings on same-sex marriage, given that the related case law was built on the same arguments that supported abortion rights. In response, Congress passed the Respect for Marriage Act a few months later, which requires that states recognize same-sex marriages performed in other states.

What that law doesn’t do is require every state to conduct same-sex ceremonies, or explicitly establish marriage as a fundamental right. Conservatives worked for decades to overturn the right to abortion by backing dozens of cases that slowly chipped away at choice, creating a patchwork of laws, some draconian, state by state.

Nearly two dozen states have now banned or severely restricted abortion. Conservatives have signaled they want a similar fight to overturn marriage equality. This time, liberals and supporters of LGBTQ rights should take them seriously and fight accordingly to protect marriage as a fundamental right for all.

Nia-Malika Henderson is a politics and policy columnist for Bloomberg Opinion. A former senior political reporter for CNN and the Washington Post, she has covered politics and campaigns for almost two decades.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Monday, Aug. 4

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Six areas of climate impacts expected for Snohomish County.
(Snohomish County Climate Resiliency Plan)
Editorial: Buidling climate resiliency with or without the EPA

Abdication of federal efforts on the climate crisis leaves a duty at the local and state levels.

2024 Presidential Election Day Symbolic Elements.
Editorial: A recap of The Herald’s primary endorsements

Primary elections, setting the November ballot, are no time for voters to sit on the sidelines.

Comment: Dehumanizing, starving Gazans was strategy all along

A Palestinian in the U.K. relates the attacks on family and friends clinging to their humanity.

Saunders: Another mass shooting; another bogus rationale

What should we care how murderers justify their actions to themselves? There is no excuse.

Comment: Gabbard’s intel trove disproves her Obama ‘treason’ claim

While the intelligence director conflates two findings, the documents clearly show what Russia did.

Comment: Trump has only himself to blame for Epstein mess

Trump played up this and other conspiracies when it suited him. Now, his denials only feed suspicion.

FILE — A coal-fired power plant and a wind turbine in Weifang, in Shandong Province, China, on Oct. 23, 2023. China installed more solar panels and wind turbines in 2024 than the rest of the world combined. (Gilles Sabrie/The New York Times)
Comment: Paris climate accord moves on without United States

The effort to confront the climate crisis is being led by other countries, including China.

Washington state's Congressional Districts (Washington State Redistricting Commission)
Editorial: State lawmakers right to skip Gerrymandering Games

While red and blue states look to game the midterms, Washington is wisely staying out of that fray.

2024 Presidential Election Day Symbolic Elements.
Editorial: Newman for Edmonds; Paige for Mountlake Terrace

Both lead strong fields of candidates for the city councils of each south county city.

2024 Presidential Election Day Symbolic Elements.
Editorial: In strong field, Sterba best for Mukilteo council post

James Sterba is a veteran Boeing engineer who offers a strong financial background.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Sunday, Aug. 3

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.