Comment: Have doubts about Twitter under Musk? Look at Tesla

By a range of measures, Musk’s electric car company is one of the most successful in the world.

By Matthew A. Winkler / Bloomberg Opinion

For all the histrionics, from the 2018 tweet “considering taking Tesla private” for which he incurred a $20 million fine from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to smoking weed during a podcast and his latest foray offering to buy Twitter for about $43 billion, Elon Musk is a pretty good business manager. In fact, the chief executive officer of the world’s most valuable automaker has no equal.

Among the 10 largest publicly-traded companies, Musk’s Tesla is No. 1 in growth the past decade with revenue increasing more than 260-fold to $53.8 billion; No. 1 the past 12 months with sales surging 71 percent; No. 1 in share performance over five and 10 years with its stock appreciating 15- and 146-fold, respectively, to a recent $1,000; and No. 1 in employment by more than quintupling its workforce since 2016, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

A world ravaged by climate change brought on in part by the overuse of fossil fuels makes electric-vehicle maker Tesla increasingly the choice of fleet operators because of the minimal fuel and maintenance costs of its zero-emission cars. That’s a big reason why Austin, Texas-based Tesla’s sales growth will be No. 1 next year (30 percent) and again in 2024 (18 percent), according to the median estimate of 33 analysts surveyed by Bloomberg.

Among the six companies with at least a $1 trillion market capitalization, none achieved the milestone as quickly — and stayed there — as Tesla, which did it 11 years after its initial public offering. It took Apple 38 years, Microsoft 33 years, Google parent Alphabet 16 years, and Amazon.com 23 years. Facebook parent Meta Platforms reached $1 trillion nine years after its IPO but has since dropped back to $600 billion, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. The stock market deems Tesla almost four times as valuable as the second-largest automaker, Toyota Motor, and worth about 57 percent of the 10 biggest combined. Looked at another way, Tesla accounts for 41 percent of the total value of the 184 publicly traded vehicle manufacturers worldwide.

Tesla, unlike its peers, persevered through the dislocations caused first by the pandemic and then war in Ukraine by spending years focused on shoring up its supply chain. That’s a big reason why Tesla was able to report record first-quarter deliveries earlier this month despite what it called “an exceptionally difficult” period marked by recurring disruptions, especially the shutdown of its Shanghai factory.

Its success in securing materials became evident when Tesla agreed in January to purchase 75,000 metric tons of nickel concentrate, an essential ingredient in electric-vehicle batteries, through a Minnesota project created by Talon Metals less than six months after a similar nickel-supply deal with Melbourne, Australia-based mining company BHP Group. Tesla also has a multiyear supply agreement for nickel with Rio De Janeiro-based Vale, Bloomberg News reported last month.

“Tesla’s vertical integration strategy has been critical,” Cathie Wood, founder, CEO and chief investment officer of Ark Investment Management, said in an interview earlier this month. Unlike its competitors, “Tesla is in control of its cars” and “can tweak and change” in contrast to rest of the auto industry whose “specs are put to bed, you know, three to four years or five years prior. And they’re not going to change.”

Wood, the little-known champion of Tesla when she launched her funds in 2014 and predicted a $1 trillion valuation when most analysts had sell recommendations at a minuscule fraction of its current price, said the company’s battery technology “is about three years ahead of any other auto manufacturer.” That’s not the only reason Wood raised her target for Tesla last week to $4,600 a share in 2026. Tesla’s “more than a million and a half cars on the road are effectively data collectors for Elon Musk,” she said. “No other auto manufacturer has cars equipped to send back this real-world driving data. In order to compete with Tesla, at let’s say a like-for-like price, they’ll either have to skimp on range or performance and rely on their brand, otherwise they’ll just lose money if they want to keep up with Tesla at the same price.”

Sure enough, Tesla’s 2021 revenue of $53.8 billion accounts for 20 percent of the entire EV market and 80 percent of the world’s six EV-only automakers, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. “Tesla is mostly maintaining their market share even as the overall EV market grows very rapidly,” said Colin McKerracher, head of transport analysis at BloombergNEF.

In addition to its incomparable real-world driving data and battery technology, Tesla has an artificial intelligence chip “that no one else has,” said Wood. “And we liken this barrier to entry to Apple’s barrier to entry when it created the chip for the smartphone.”

Tesla’s fourth advantage is that “Elon describes Tesla as a manufacturer of factories,” with plants in Freemont, Calif., Austin, Shanghai and Berlin. “With each factory, Tesla becomes more efficient and more productive,” said Wood. “It is from the bottom up, constructing these highly automated factories, more automated than anyone else’s in the world.”

Too often, Elon Musk makes the news for the wrong reasons, giving his detractors a steady stream of fodder to use against someone they say is little more than a self-absorbed corporate carnival barker. Musk’s success as a pre-eminent maximizer of shareholder value proves otherwise.

Matthew A. Winkler is co-founder of Bloomberg News (1990) and editor-in-chief emeritus; Bloomberg Opinion columnist since 2015; co-founder of Bloomberg Business Journalism Diversity Program in 2017.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Friday, Dec. 6

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Electric Time technician Dan LaMoore adjusts a clock hand on a 1000-lb., 12-foot diameter clock constructed for a resort in Vietnam, Tuesday, March 9, 2021, in Medfield, Mass. Daylight saving time begins at 2 a.m. local time Sunday, March 14, 2021, when clocks are set ahead one hour. (AP Photo/Elise Amendola)
Editorial: Stop the clock on our twice-yearly time change

State lawmakers may debate a bill to adopt standard time permanently, ending the daylight time switch.

Schwab: Begging readers’ pardon, a defense of the ‘indefensible’

Considering the context of all that transpired, Biden’s pardon of his son is itself a pardonable sin.

Questions remain about new or refurbished home for AquaSox

I imagine I have read most of The Herald’s reportage on the… Continue reading

Sid Schwab back his opinion with facts, sources

The Herald recently printed a letter critical of columnist Sid Schwab. That… Continue reading

Black-and-white thinking: Choices and issues aren’t binary

A recent letter to the editor asked, “why are voters averse to… Continue reading

Comment: Musk’s DOGE plans can’t dodge Constitution

He and Ramaswamy think the Supreme Court will OK Trump’s usurping of Congress’ budget powers. It won’t.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Thursday, Dec. 5

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

The Everett Public Library in Everett, Washington on Thursday, Jan. 19, 2023. (Annie Barker / The Herald)
Editorial: What do you want and what are you willing to pay?

As local governments struggle to fund services with available revenue, residents have decisions ahead.

Children play and look up at a large whale figure hanging from the ceiling at the Imagine Children’s Museum on Wednesday, Oct. 26, 2022 in Everett, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Making your holiday shopping count for even more

Gifts of experiences can be found at YMCA, Village Theatre, Schack and Imagine Children’s Museum.

FILE — Bill Nye, the science educator, in New York, March 5, 2015. Nye filed a $37 million lawsuit against Disney and its subsidiaries on Aug. 25, 2017, alleging that he was deprived of extensive profits from his show “Bill Nye, the Science Guy,” which ran on PBS from 1993 to 1998. (Jake Naughton/The New York Times)
Editorial: What saved climate act? Good sense and a Science Guy

A majority kept the Climate Commitment Act because of its investments, with some help from Bill Nye.

Tufekci: Without a law, your private data is up for grabs

Even location data from a weather app can be sold to police and scammers. Are you OK with that?

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.