Comment: Manchin plan may give GOP out on debt ultimatum

Republicans have backed themselves into a corner; a panel on deficit reduction gives them a partial victory.

By Matthew Yglesias / Bloomberg Opinion

As part of a deal to increase the debt ceiling, Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., wants Congress to appoint a bipartisan commission on entitlement reform. I know what you’re thinking: Another debt ceiling crisis? Another bipartisan commission? Another session of Congress dominated by what Manchin wants?

This time, however, it’s Republicans more than Democrats who ought to appreciate the wisdom of playing ball with the moderate Democratic senator. House Speaker Kevin McCarthy and his colleagues have painted themselves into a corner on this issue. They’ve made clear what they don’t want to do — raise the debt ceiling without concessions from Democrats — but they don’t have an alternative proposal of their own.

Meanwhile, though it’s easy to roll one’s eyes at the similarity between Manchin’s proposal and the failed Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction that met in 2011, today’s situation is different in important ways.

During President Barack Obama’s first term, concern over the deficit was purely political hysteria. Interest rates were low, inflation was low, unemployment was high, and the Federal Reserve was debating how far to go in terms of unorthodox monetary measures to stimulate the economy.

Today’s economic reality is utterly transformed. The unemployment rate is at its lowest level in decades. Inflation, though fallen from its highs of last year, is still well above the Fed’s 2 percent target rate. And interest rates, though not exactly high in historical terms, are higher than they’ve been for a long time; and are still going up.

Under the circumstances, a call for deficit reduction actually makes sense.

At the same time, the internal politics of the Republican Party have shifted. In 2011, John Boehner and Paul Ryan, for better or worse, had a House majority that was ready and willing to pass radical budget proposals that called for huge cuts to Medicaid and domestic discretionary spending, while also privatizing Medicare. The effort to force the White House to accede to such a plan as the price of raising the debt ceiling failed, but they tried.

Fast forward to 2022, when Florida’s Republican Sen. Rick Scott’s agenda for budget cuts was immediately disavowed by Minority Leader Mitch McConnell. Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis almost never talks about fiscal issues in public, even though he has become a conservative superstar in part by winking to the donor class that (unlike his rival Donald Trump) he is not opposed to cuts in Social Security and Medicare.

In short, nobody in the Republican Party within six feet of a competitive election wants to run on big entitlement cuts. Which is why, for all the drama in the House, Republicans are nowhere near to producing a plan that has anything like 218 votes.

They’re demanding that Democrats negotiate with them, but they don’t have a position to form the basis for a start of negotiations. So the White House and most Democrats on Capitol Hill are comfortable rejecting the various piecemeal Republican proposals, which they see as an effort to get President Biden and Democratic leadership to negotiate with themselves.

In part, Republicans may be overestimating their own leverage because they misremember the Obama-era debt ceiling crisis.

A crucial factor in 2011 was that Obama sincerely wanted a dramatic bipartisan deal to reduce the deficit. For whatever mix of political and substantive reasons, it was one of his priorities, and he wasn’t opposed to using the debt ceiling as a way to get talks going.

Biden, despite his fondness for bipartisanship and his embrace of deficit reduction as part of the misleadingly named Inflation Reduction Act, does not appear to be in any hurry to cut a bipartisan deal on the deficit.

He agreed to the Inflation Reduction Act to get talks with Manchin restarted. But it was a partisan bill whose main purpose was to advance Biden’s policy on energy and health care. And he has talked incessantly, during his campaign and since becoming president, about uniting the country and has signed a range of bipartisan legislation that the White House is very proud of.

But a grand bargain on deficit reduction has never been an administration priority. He seems less convinced than Obama was of the merits of entitlement reform, and more willing than Obama was to simply go with the flow rather than trying to persuade Republicans to raise taxes.

This altered situation is exactly why Republicans should take Manchin seriously.

The supercommittee, the Simpson-Bowles commission, and similar efforts failed last time around because Republicans thought they could get a better deal by beating Obama and taking an all-cuts approach to deficit reduction. But they didn’t beat Obama — taxes went up — and by the time there was a GOP governing majority in 2017, there was no longer a party consensus in favor of cutting Medicare and Social Security. Conservatives had overplayed their hand.

Manchin is offering Republicans both a road out of the dead-end course they’ve set themselves on; and another chance to cut entitlements. Democratic leaders aren’t enthusiastic about this idea anymore, but if Republicans were united around something with even a patina of bipartisanship, Biden and moderate congressional Democrats would have a hard time saying no.

Matthew Yglesias writes the Slow Boring newsletter and is the author of “One Billion Americans: The Case for Thinking Bigger.”

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

THis is an editorial cartoon by Michael de Adder . Michael de Adder was born in Moncton, New Brunswick. He studied art at Mount Allison University where he received a Bachelor of Fine Arts in drawing and painting. He began his career working for The Coast, a Halifax-based alternative weekly, drawing a popular comic strip called Walterworld which lampooned the then-current mayor of Halifax, Walter Fitzgerald. This led to freelance jobs at The Chronicle-Herald and The Hill Times in Ottawa, Ontario.

 

After freelancing for a few years, de Adder landed his first full time cartooning job at the Halifax Daily News. After the Daily News folded in 2008, he became the full-time freelance cartoonist at New Brunswick Publishing. He was let go for political views expressed through his work including a cartoon depicting U.S. President Donald Trump’s border policies. He now freelances for the Halifax Chronicle Herald, the Toronto Star, Ottawa Hill Times and Counterpoint in the USA. He has over a million readers per day and is considered the most read cartoonist in Canada.

 

Michael de Adder has won numerous awards for his work, including seven Atlantic Journalism Awards plus a Gold Innovation Award for news animation in 2008. He won the Association of Editorial Cartoonists' 2002 Golden Spike Award for best editorial cartoon spiked by an editor and the Association of Canadian Cartoonists 2014 Townsend Award. The National Cartoonists Society for the Reuben Award has shortlisted him in the Editorial Cartooning category. He is a past president of the Association of Canadian Editorial Cartoonists and spent 10 years on the board of the Cartoonists Rights Network.
Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, Jan. 7

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Four people were injured in a suspected DUI collision Saturday night on Highway 99 near Lynnwood. (Washington State Patrol)
Editorial: Numbers, results back lower BAC for Washington

Utah’s experience backs Sen. John Lovick’s bill to lower the blood alcohol limit for drivers to 0.05.

Welch: State lawmakers have a chance to chart a better course

Rather than being driven by ideology, the Legislature needs to set policies that focus on outcomes.

Boule: Over centuries, a sickness has eaten away at democracy

At full speed in the 21st, it festers in the nation’s inability to hold corrupt leaders responsible.

Everett schools protecting freedoms in defending LifeWise lawsuit

The lawsuit filed by LifeWise Academy against Everett Public Schools claims “religious… Continue reading

New era for city of Snohomish’s leadership welcomed

Thank you Everett Herald for your report on the lame duck Snohomish… Continue reading

GOP, voters should back proposal for ‘millionaire’s tax’

The recent editorial, to tax the highest income of earners over $1… Continue reading

Institute for Tax and Economic Policy
Editorial: ‘Millionaires’ tax’ can deliver fairness, revenue

The governor’s proposal should be placed on the ballot, allowing voters a chance to rebalance tax fairness.

CNA Nina Prigodich, right, goes through restorative exercises with long term care patient Betty Long, 86, at Nightingale's View Ridge Care Center on Friday, Feb. 10, 2023 in Everett, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Skilled nursing care must remain state budget priority

The governor’s spending plan would claw back Medicaid reimbursements that pay skilled-nursing care staff.

In a gathering similar to many others across the nation on Presidents Day, hundreds lined Broadway with their signs and chants to protest the Trump administration Monday evening in Everett. (Aaron Kennedy / Daily Herald)
Editorial: An opinionated look at 2025

A review of local, state and national events through the lens of the opinions of The Herald Editorial Board.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, Jan. 6

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Much success rests on bond, levy for Everett Public Schools

As elections and public libraries are cornerstones of engagement in American democracy,… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.