Comment: Our county is growing; trees must grow with us

The county council must include urban tree canopy policies as it updates its comprehensive plan.

By Kristin Kelly and Kate Lunceford / For The Herald

For long-time Snohomish County residents, we know too well how much our county has grown and changed over the last 35 years.

As a rapidly growing county, much of our once wooded and undeveloped rural and urban neighborhoods have transformed into large housing developments, businesses, roads and other services that are needed to service a growing population. Snohomish County has grown from a population of 465,000 in 1990 to today’s population of 867,100. After two years of process, this month, the Snohomish County Council will be making its final decisions on the required update to the 2024 Comprehensive Plan that will plan for our county population to swell to more than a million people in the next 20 years.

We know that all this new growth can have substantial negative impacts on our environment and our quality of life because we have seen it and have lived it. Our hope is the council will make the right decisions during this update that will truly combat these negative impacts. The council must work as always to ensure protection of our farms, forests, water quality and fish and wildlife habitat. And with recent news that our planet has experienced the hottest days ever recorded, they now must meet the challenge of climate change as well.

This is where we need valiant action and political will!

We are calling on the County Council to adopt a set of policies for retaining and replacing urban trees in our unincorporated urban growth areas as part of the Comprehensive Plan Update. These policies, named the Urban Tree Canopy Policies, if adopted will become part of the Natural Environment Element of the county’s Comprehensive Plan. The Planning Commission recommends approval of these policies as well.

These urban tree canopy policies will ensure more significant trees stay in the ground as new housing is allowed to be built, and to replace lost trees in areas where they are lacking. The goal is to keep at least a “no net loss” of 38 percent tree canopy coverage as new growth and development continue, among other benefits. These policies are modeled on the Department of Natural Resources’ Evergreen Community Act and will replace the current subdivision landscaping regulations that have not adequately protected our urban trees and have done nothing to restore the county’s already built communities.

More trees in our urban communities have enormous benefits. Trees will:

• Reverse the impacts of climate change through carbon sequestration;

• Eliminate heat islands;

• Increase property values;

• Ensure more habitat for birds and small mammals;

• Boost local economies;

• Reduce floods and infrastructure damage;

• Improve air and water quality and lessen pollution;

• Lessen soil erosion and landslides;

• Mitigate stormwater impacts;

• Block noise and light pollution;

• Support salmon populations;

• Provide cool, shady places in summer months and windbreaks for winter storms;

• Conserve energy use;

• Contribute to mental and physical health benefits; and

• Save taxpayers money

The research is clear and well-documented: saving and replanting more trees — and the right trees — in our urban areas will have positive effects for everyone. Plus, people love having large trees in their neighborhoods, whether they live in a single-family home or a large apartment complex.

For too many years the county has created unhealthy conditions for thousands of people who are marginalized and forgotten in land use decisions. Correcting these inequities is a highlight of the update, and these urban tree policies need to be part of that correction to abate heat islands created by a lack of trees in our urban communities.

This is our future! We must demand that our elected county council members meet the environmental and climate change challenges of our fast-growing county. Already there are 26 organizations on record supporting the adoption of the Urban Tree Canopy Policies, as well as the mayors and city council members of Snohomish, Mountlake Terrace and Bothell, along with the Tulalip Tribes and the Snohomish Conservation District, representing thousands of Snohomish County residents.

Now it is crunch time! If you agree with us, please let your voice be heard.

Kristin Kelly lives in rural Snohomish County and represents Futurewise, and Kate Lunceford lives in Bothell and leads the League of Women Voters of Snohomish County Tree Campaign. Both have worked with the county for over two years on the Urban Tree Canopy Policies.

Speak for trees at hearing

The public hearings start at 6 p.m. Monday, Aug. 19. Email the Council at county.council@snoco.org with your written comments. To access the information on the Urban Tree Canopy Policies and info for testifying and submitting comments, visit www.snohomishcountywa.gov/2134/Council-Hearings-Calendar.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

People walk adjacent to the border with Canada at the Peace Arch in Peace Arch Historical State Park, where cars behind wait to enter Canada at the border crossing Monday, Aug. 9, 2021, in Blaine, Wash. Canada lifted its prohibition on Americans crossing the border to shop, vacation or visit, but America kept similar restrictions in place, part of a bumpy return to normalcy from coronavirus travel bans. (AP Photo/Elaine Thompson)
Editorial: Find respectful policy on tariffs, trade with Canada

Washington state depends on trade with Canada. The Trump administration’s belligerence is harmful.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Sunday, Feb. 22

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

FILE — A neighborhood in Poca across the Kanawha River from the John Amos Power Plant, a three-unit, coal-fired power plant in Winfield, W.Va., Sept. 19, 2025. In a reversal, the Environmental Protection Agency plans to calculate only the cost to industry when setting pollution limits, and not the monetary value of saving human lives, documents show. (Alyssa Schukar/The New York Times)
Comment: What happens now with end of a 2009 EPA climate finding

The Trump administration will move to kill climate regulations. But expect fact-based court challenges.

The Buzz: E.T., phone home and check your messages from Trump

President Trump says he’ll release files on aliens while Colbert weighs a campaign management career.

Everett City Council posts should be full-time jobs

Everett has grown into a regional city with regional responsibilities. Our City… Continue reading

Letter: Trump using office for personal profit

Where does the buck stop? Evidently, the bucks stop (and piles up… Continue reading

toon
Editorial cartoons for Saturday, Feb. 21

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Comment: Reform of tobacco taxes can fund response to its harms

Senate Bill 6129 better fits current products and directs revenue to public health work and research.

Comment: Cap on child care would harm families and employers

Leaving thousands out of a state child care program will be more costly to the state in the long run.

Comment: More taxes on health care won’t make state more affordable

Proposals in the Legislature could increase health care costs for workers and businesses.

Forum: Cuts to programs for vulnerable kids a costly bargain

Funding for developmentally disabled infants and toddlers reduces costs later in life. Cutting them makes no sense.

Forum: We have reached the peak of self-esteem’s self-assurance

Everybody daydreams of being a hero, but people need to recognize the value in playing their part.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.