Comment: Rally shooter’s motive is irrelevant; his gun isn’t

Luck and a novice shooter likely spared Trump’s life. Had a bump stock been used neither would have mattered.

By Francis Wilkinson / Bloomberg Opinion

We have entered the motive stage. What was the shooter thinking? Was he a radical driven by ideology? A mentally unhinged loner longing to impress a movie star? A disgruntled employee who just lost his job and wanted to shoot something? Why did a 20-year-old white man from Western Pennsylvania shoot Donald Trump on Saturday night?

These questions are part of the ritual aftermath of a major public shooting. They are also completely irrelevant.

In a nation of 340 million people there are millions of Americans who fit virtually every one of the broad labels above. Millions of Americans are addled by political ideology. Millions hate their jobs or were fired by a boss whom they despise. Millions are loners struggling with emotions they can’t always control. Millions hate the current president or an ex-president.

There is only one thing that differentiates Thomas Matthew Crooks, of Bethel Park, Pa., the man the FBI says is responsible for the shooting, from millions of other Americans who didn’t try to kill an ex-president: He added a loaded gun to his problems and brought the whole mess to a violent climax. Crooks carried a semi-automatic rifle with him to a political event and used it for the purpose for which it was designed. He grazed Trump with a bullet fired at a distance of roughly 450 feet, and left one dead and two critically wounded.

We can be grateful that Crooks wasn’t a better shot, which appears to be the reason that Trump is alive. A better shooter might have done more than graze his principal target. But even Crooks could’ve improved his chances. He might have taken a tip from the U.S. Supreme Court and applied a bump stock to his firearm. The court’s conservatives are absolutely gung-ho for Americans like Crooks, regardless of their personal demons, to be well-armed in our midst. In June, the majority gave a thumbs-up to bump stocks when it ruled that the Trump administration erred in banning the devices after 2017’s bump-stock-enabled massacre in Las Vegas.

A bump stock is a device designed to turn a semi-automatic killing machine into a more efficient, and even more indiscriminate, automatic killing machine. The Las Vegas killer fired off an estimated 1,000 rounds into the crowd in a matter of minutes. He was farther from his targets than Crooks was from Trump, yet with a bump stock he managed to kill 58 and injure hundreds.

A bump stock, like an AR-15, has no other purpose than to help a shooter kill more people, more quickly. But for reasons that they can never quite articulate, this Supreme Court, along with the Republican Party, encourages Americans to buy and possess extraordinarily efficient mass killing machines, and then encourages them to make them more deadly still. As someone who has read many of the court’s opinions, and many statements from Republican politicians, I can report that the rationale does not involve well-regulated militias. But the reasons typically provided, about rights and safety, have been repeatedly exposed as nonsense. Enabling murder does not preserve rights. Endangering the public does not enhance safety.

With a bump stock attached to his semi-automatic rifle, Crooks could’ve sprayed the stage around Trump. His lack of skill likely wouldn’t have mattered. And our politics, sick as they are, would likely have been rendered instantly sicker. There are a lot of unbalanced people in America. Why so many politicians and judges want them to keep killing us is the only question of motive that matters.

Francis Wilkinson is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering U.S. politics and policy. Previously, he was executive editor for The Week and a writer for Rolling Stone. ©2024 Bloomberg L.P., bloomberg.com/opinion. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

THis is an editorial cartoon by Michael de Adder . Michael de Adder was born in Moncton, New Brunswick. He studied art at Mount Allison University where he received a Bachelor of Fine Arts in drawing and painting. He began his career working for The Coast, a Halifax-based alternative weekly, drawing a popular comic strip called Walterworld which lampooned the then-current mayor of Halifax, Walter Fitzgerald. This led to freelance jobs at The Chronicle-Herald and The Hill Times in Ottawa, Ontario.

 

After freelancing for a few years, de Adder landed his first full time cartooning job at the Halifax Daily News. After the Daily News folded in 2008, he became the full-time freelance cartoonist at New Brunswick Publishing. He was let go for political views expressed through his work including a cartoon depicting U.S. President Donald Trump’s border policies. He now freelances for the Halifax Chronicle Herald, the Toronto Star, Ottawa Hill Times and Counterpoint in the USA. He has over a million readers per day and is considered the most read cartoonist in Canada.

 

Michael de Adder has won numerous awards for his work, including seven Atlantic Journalism Awards plus a Gold Innovation Award for news animation in 2008. He won the Association of Editorial Cartoonists' 2002 Golden Spike Award for best editorial cartoon spiked by an editor and the Association of Canadian Cartoonists 2014 Townsend Award. The National Cartoonists Society for the Reuben Award has shortlisted him in the Editorial Cartooning category. He is a past president of the Association of Canadian Editorial Cartoonists and spent 10 years on the board of the Cartoonists Rights Network.
Editorial cartoons for Monday, Aug. 25

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Gov. Bob Ferguson responds to U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi's demands that the state end so-called sanctuary policies. (Office of Governor of Washington)
Editorial: Governor’s reasoned defiance to Bondi’s ICE demands

In the face of threats, the 10th Amendment protects a state law on law enforcement cooperation.

Comment: Ukrainian summitry is all reality TV, zero substance

While bombs fall on Ukrainians, President Trump asks of his staged exchanges, ‘How is it playing?’

Harrop: Only U.S. foes could craft so damaging an energy policy

Trump wants “energy dominance,” but he’s sapping the strength of clean energy and fossil fuels.

Comment: Can ‘smart’ tech improve aviation safety at airports?

Southwest Airlines is testing smart tech on its Boeing 737s to judge their use in avoiding incursions.

Comment: Can you still get a covid booster? It’s complicated.

Shifting guidelines, uncertain insurance coverage and inconsistent availability will make things difficult.

Second grade teacher Debbie Lindgren high-fives her students as they line up outside the classroom on the first day of school at Hazelwood Elementary on Wednesday, Sept. 4, 2024 in Lynnwood, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Comment: Public schools still country’s ‘highest earthly duty’

A shift to private schools from public could leave the nation less prosperous and more divided.

Russian President Vladimir Putin and President Donald Trump shake hands after a joint news conference following their meeting in Anchorage, Alaska, Aug. 15, 2025. Amid the setbacks for Ukraine from the meeting in Alaska, officials in Kyiv seized on one glimmer of hope — a U.S. proposal to include security guarantees for Ukraine in any potential peace deal with Russia. (Doug Mills/The New York Times)
Editorial: We’ll keep our mail-in ballots; thank you, Mr. Putin

Trump, at the suggestion of Russia’s president, is again going after states that use mail-in ballots.

Rep. Suzanne DelBene and South County Fire Chief Bob Eastman chat during a tour and discussion with community leaders regarding the Mountlake Terrace Main Street Revitalization project on Tuesday, May 28, 2024, at the Traxx Apartments in Mountlake Terrace, Washington. (Ryan Berry / The Herald)
Editorial: Gerrymandering invites a concerning tit-for-tat

Democrats, among them Rep. Suzan DelBene, see a need for a response to Texas’ partisan redistricting.

Getty Images
Window cleaner using a squeegee to wash a window with clear blue sky
Editorial: Auditor’s Office tools provide view into government

Good government depends on transparency into its actions. We need to make use of that window.

Pay Herald’s news staffers fairly, without quotas

I’m writing as a concerned member of the community who deeply values… Continue reading

Lincoln’s empathy: Let’s make America kind again

Regarding Christi Parsons’ excellent column on President Lincoln’s empathy (“A nation divided… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.