Comment: Rogan, Young battle shows Spotify’s near monopoly

If it were easier to switch among streaming services, we’d see a better choice of content.

By Lionel Laurent / Bloomberg Opinion

When Neil Young launched his boycott of Spotify over its hosting of popular podcaster Joe Rogan, whom the rocker accused of spreading covid misinformation, the Polish startup FreeYourMusic sprang into action. It tweeted the hashtags #cancelspotify and #byespotify to draw attention to its main product; the free transfer of music playlists from one platform to another.

Opportunistic? Sure. But also a reminder of the swirl of issues facing Spotify as it’s dragged into territory commonly associated with Big Tech, such as platform dominance.

Even if the main thrust of Young’s standoff was about Spotify taking responsibility for the content produced by its burgeoning podcast empire — the company has since announced some welcome changes — the question of whether there are enough viable alternatives to Spotify is never far away, as Kara Swisher recently mused.

With approximately 380 million users and a 31 percent share of the music-streaming market, ahead of Apple Music’s 15 percent, Spotify isn’t quite Facebook (the social-networking giant has 3 billion users). But the platform is big, and the network effects of its music catalog — now augmented by podcasts — are incredibly powerful. The days when fans were forced to find The Beatles or Metallica on CDs or downloaded files are long gone. Spotify’s deep well of content, combined with gobs of consumer data, papers our lives with playlists. Its algorithm reigns supreme.

There are rival platforms out there, but the switching costs feel high. Deleting a Spotify account, signing up to another platform and painstakingly rebuilding a new algorithmic cage is a chore. Third-party apps promising an easier time don’t help that much; I tried using both FreeYourMusic and SongShift to export playlists to YouTube and had no luck, though others seem to have had some success.

This may seem like a separate issue to the Rogan saga, but it’s closely linked. The standoff quickly descended into an all-or-nothing online fight between “anti-misinformation” and “pro-free speech” camps. But for his part, Young made clear this was about choosing to part ways with Spotify, not censoring Rogan, and said that users were free to listen to his music on other streaming platforms. “As an unexpected bonus, I sound better everywhere else,” he reportedly added, a teasing reference to sound quality.

If switching services was easier for people willing to follow Young, perhaps the issue wouldn’t have been so polarizing; it would have resembled an unhappy customer crossing the street to go to another restaurant, rather than yelling for hours for a different menu. “This whole fight could be avoided … if people could move,” FreeYourMusic co-founder Bartosz Hernas tells me. “But because people cannot, it needs to be a fight.”

As U.K. regulators pore over the lopsided economics of music streaming, and as the European Union ramps up scrutiny of platforms, it’s time to put consumer choice back at the top of the priority list. Regulators have the power to help lower switching costs in the platform economy by standardizing the portability of personal data, such as music playlists, to other platforms. We’ve seen the benefits in the telecoms industry, where we can now take our phone number with us when switching operators, and in apps sharing our bank-account data.

In fact, the EU’s flagship data-privacy rules known as GDPR already enshrine this right to data portability. But in practice, it hasn’t taken off, as the process is still clunky and a lot is left up to individual companies. A report published last year by data-compliance firm Alias, which tested several platforms, found that Spotify sent “very little” appropriate data, with non-interoperable formats and often incomprehensible file names.

What’s missing are standardized tools and software interfaces to make the reality of data portability live up to the theory. While not a magic wand, there could be benefits for innovation. Competition might be less about building the most elaborately walled garden, and more about sound quality or user experience or content moderation. The fight against harmful content and misinformation wouldn’t go away, but it might at least be fought more thoroughly.

Maybe then we would find out if there’s room in this world for both Joe Rogan and Neil Young; without raising an army to get a platform to change its tune.

Lionel Laurent is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering the European Union and France. He worked previously at Reuters and Forbes.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, Jan. 14

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Tina Ruybal prepares ballots to be moved to the extraction point in the Snohomish County Election Center on Nov. 3, 2025 in Everett, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: A win for vote-by-mail, amid gathering concern

A judge preserved the state’s deadline for mailed ballots, but more challenges to voting are ahead.

caddyBurke: Work as a young caddy allowed a swing at life skills

Along with learning blackjack, Yiddish and golf’s finer points, it taught the art of observation.

Comment: From start, nation has relied on little ‘Common Sense’

Paine’s pamphlet laid out the case for independence, principles that the nation needed over its 250 years.

Comment: Wind energy scores win in court, but long fight ahead

A judge ruled against a Trump order to shut down a project, but projects still face his opposition.

Comment: Trump’s credit card cap would throw weakest to sharks

Trump’s demand would cut credit access for many borrowers, leaving them to even harsher options.

Comment: Keeping silence against injustice invites more injustice

Many fear consequences for speaking out, but far worse consequences are risked by tacit approval.

FILE - The sun dial near the Legislative Building is shown under cloudy skies, March 10, 2022, at the state Capitol in Olympia, Wash. An effort to balance what is considered the nation's most regressive state tax code comes before the Washington Supreme Court on Thursday, Jan. 26, 2023, in a case that could overturn a prohibition on income taxes that dates to the 1930s. (AP Photo/Ted S. Warren, File)
Editorial: No new taxes, but maybe ‘pay as we go’ on some needs

New taxes won’t resolve the state’s budget woes, but more limited reforms can still make a difference.

Washington state's Congressional Districts adopted in 2021. (Washington State Redistricting Commission)
Editorial: Lawmakers shouldn’t futz with partisan redistricting

A new proposal to allow state lawmakers to gerrymander congressional districts should be rejected.

Four people were injured in a suspected DUI collision Saturday night on Highway 99 near Lynnwood. (Washington State Patrol)
Editorial: Numbers, results back lower BAC for Washington

Utah’s experience backs Sen. John Lovick’s bill to lower the blood alcohol limit for drivers to 0.05.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, Jan. 13

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Support of Everett schools’ bond, levy shapes student success

As a proud parent of daughters who began their Everett Public Schools… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.