Comment: State’s ‘ban’ of natural gas sets aside a climate tool

A new state law threatens to drive up power costs, burden the grid and work against its climate goals.

By Benji Backer / For The Herald

As a Gen Z environmental advocate, an enthusiast of Washington state’s natural beauty and a proud graduate of the University of Washington, I’m dismayed by the state’s latest move to effectively ban natural gas.

Masquerading as “climate policy,” the ban will do little (if anything) to curb the state’s rising emissions. Instead, its biggest impact will be burdening hardworking Washingtonians and further straining the grid.

House Bill 1589, signed into law in March, puts pressure on utility companies and customers to go all-electric in order to stay in line with the state’s unrealistic, top-down approach to climate and clean energy. Despite claims that the bill is not a ban, it directs the state’s largest energy utility, Puget Sound Energy (PSE), to transition away from natural gas, starting now. Not to mention that the bill includes restrictions on the use of natural gas equipment in homes and businesses.

PSE is touting the bill as a win because they won’t pay for this bad policy; ratepayers will. For some time, residents in the state have enjoyed electricity rates below the national average, but that could soon change. HB 1589 could more than double Washingtonian’s electric bills, disproportionately affecting moderate- and low-income households. The Building Industry Association of Washington estimates that this effort to convert to all-electric will cost an average of $40,000 per home.

Moreover, the state’s grid is already stressed, and moving away from natural gas without a realistic plan to replace this reliable energy source will increase the risk of blackouts. Earlier this year, PSE asked customers to reduce their natural gas and electricity usage during a winter storm when demand skyrocketed and supply was insufficient. With grid operators across the country warning of threats to reliability, Washington’s move to further strain the grid by moving away from natural gas entirely isn’t just bad policy, it’s irresponsible.

Yes, we must reduce emissions to address climate change, but misinformed policies like this are not the answer. Similar attacks on natural gas at the federal level, such as President Biden’s ban on liquid natural gas exports, do nothing but elevate dirtier energy from countries such as China and Russia and threaten our allies’ energy security.

Interestingly, a new report from Resources for the Future finds that phasing out fossil fuels entirely is not even a prerequisite for meeting climate goals. Among the climate scenarios examined, fossil fuels will continue to contribute to the solution, particularly with carbon capture and storage, through at least 2050. In response to Washington’s past top-down, big government efforts to phase out fossil fuels, emissions in the state have not significantly decreased, threatening its ability to meet climate goals.

Additionally, a lesser-known fact is that natural gas is the primary reason the United States has led the world in emissions reductions over the past couple of decades. Although natural gas is not currently carbon-free, it is a cleaner alternative to coal. With innovations in carbon capture and storage and responsible management of methane, natural gas could provide clean, reliable energy well into the future. Washington’s efforts to ban natural gas would effectively remove this tool from the toolbox based on politics, not science.

Instead of forcing feel-good policies that hurt hardworking Americans, threaten reliability, and do little to mitigate climate change, the state should take an any-of-the-above energy approach that embraces renewables, nuclear energy and natural gas alike.

Unfortunately, Washington continues to force bad policies that cater to out-of-touch environmentalists while unfairly burdening citizens who need to heat their homes and put food on the table. A natural gas ban is not the answer; an all-of-the-above energy approach is.

Benji Backer is the founder and executive chairman of the American Conservation Coalition (ACC) and author of “The Conservative Environmentalist,” released April 16. Follow him on X @BenjiBacker.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Saturday, Feb. 8

A sketechy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

bar graph, pie chart and diagrams isolated on white, 3d illustration
Editorial: Don’t let state’s budget numbers intimidate you

With budget discussions starting soon, a new website explains the basics of state’s budget crisis.

Comment: Democracy depends on support of local journalism

A state bill provides funding to support local news outlets through a modest tax on tech businesses.

Comment: Love is intoxicating; romance doesn’t have to be

Navigating sobriety while dating, with Valentine’s Day coming up, is possible and fulfilling.

Comment: State attempt at single-payer health care bound to fail

Other states have tried, but balked when confronted with the immense cost to state taxpayers.

Forum: Requiem for a lost heavyweight: Sports Illustrated

SI, with Time and NatGeo, were a holy trinity for me and my dad. Now, it’s a world of AI clickbait.

Forum: Political leaders should leave trash talk to ballplayers

Verbal intimidation is one thing on the basketball court; it shouldn’t have a place in our politics.

The Buzz: Why, no, we have complete trust in Elon Musk

But whatever he and Trump are doing to the country, could they please wish it into the cornfield?

Curtains act as doors for a handful of classrooms at Glenwood Elementary on Monday, Sept. 9, 2024 in Lake Stevens, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Schools’ building needs point to election reform

Construction funding requests in Arlington and Lake Stevens show need for a change to bond elections.

FILE- In this Nov. 14, 2017, file photo Jaìme Ceja operates a forklift while loading boxes of Red Delicious apples on to a trailer during his shift in an orchard in Tieton, Wash. Cherry and apple growers in Washington state are worried their exports to China will be hurt by a trade war that escalated on Monday when that country raised import duties on a $3 billion list of products. (Shawn Gust/Yakima Herald-Republic via AP, File)
Editorial: Trade war would harm state’s consumers, jobs

Trump’s threat of tariffs to win non-trade concessions complicates talks, says a state trade advocate.

A press operator grabs a Herald newspaper to check over as the papers roll off the press in March 2022 in Everett. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald file photo)
Editorial: Push back news desert with journalism support

A bill in the state Senate would tax big tech to support a hiring fund for local news outlets.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Friday, Feb. 7

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.