Comment: Street seating in Snohomish needs to get permit or go

With the pandemic emergency over, the city can’t allow street seating to remain unless permitted.

By Heather Thomas / For The Herald

Some online ads have surfaced recently that have a lot of misinformation and confusion about the City of Snohomish’s code enforcement action regarding unpermitted temporary structures around town, such as outdoor seating and dining. We want to help answer some of the frequently asked questions, while also setting the record straight.

No new ordinance has been enacted by the city. The city’s adopted building codes have been in place for more than 60 years. The current version is the International Building Code, a standard code in place for all Washington cities since 2004. The Washington State Building Code Council mandates that local jurisdictions like the City of Snohomish adopt these building and construction codes as they are updated. The last update of the building code was adopted by the Snohomish City Council through Ordinance 2414 in 2021. While a city can be more stringent than state or federal laws, they cannot be less restrictive. Structures used for outdoor seating and dining — temporary or permanent — must be permitted. This has been the case since 1959, and the city’s requirements for these permits mirror the international code.

The end of state of emergency for the pandemic meant some structures needed to be removed. The city issued a state of emergency in March 2020 in response to the covid-19 pandemic. This suspended code enforcement on outdoor seating areas for several years and allowed businesses to add temporary structures for outdoor seating and dining. Temporary structures like these were never intended to be used for commercial purposes, like dining or outdoor seating, because they violate the International Building Code. Once the emergency proclamation was lifted on Nov. 1, 2022, the temporary structures either needed to be removed or permitted.

ADVERTISEMENT
0 seconds of 0 secondsVolume 0%
Press shift question mark to access a list of keyboard shortcuts
00:00
00:00
00:00
 

Temporary or not, outdoor dining structures still require a permit. While some of these structures may have been installed by engineering or construction firms, they still are required to be permitted and meet the international standards. Temporary structures that meet permit requirements are only allowed to be up for a maximum of six months. Certain types of permanent structures are allowed under these standards, but they also have to be permitted and inspected by the city’s building official. In early 2023, staff reached out to restaurants and bars that still had these structures in place. A vast majority of those restaurants and bars promptly removed the structures as requested.

The city has provided multiple options and opportunities to come into compliance. In August 2023, a total of eight businesses were contacted because they had not responded to previous requests to file for a permit or remove these structures. These businesses were issued official code enforcement notices and provided the option of removing the structure or entering into a voluntary compliance agreement. The city developed this voluntary compliance agreement to provide the businesses with an additional six-month period during which they could keep the structure up while they worked with the city on a longer-term solution to get permitted.

The city has an obligation to enforce life and safety issues. These structures violate the International Building Code, which the city is mandated by the State Building Code Council to adopt and enforce. Not only would knowingly allowing an unpermitted structure like these be a violation of state and international codes, but it opens a significant amount of liability for the city, property owners and business operators. This presents a risk to the taxpayers as the city could be named in a lawsuit for failing to enforce safety regulations if someone were harmed. Lastly, not enforcing the building code requirements for some businesses creates inequity for those businesses that follow permit requirements.

All businesses have either removed the structures or are working with the city on permitting. Four of those eight businesses have removed their unpermitted structures. The remaining four businesses, in conjunction with their property owners, have entered into a 180-day voluntary compliance agreement. They are working with city staff on potential structures that will meet the International Building Code and fire code requirements.

It is important to get both sides of the story when viewing social media ads and online comments. As is usually the case, there’s a lot more to it than a few soundbites. The city has created a webpage on this topic with more background and frequently asked questions. I invite you to review that information at: www.snohomishwa.gov/821/Temporary-Structures.

Heather Thomas is city administrator for the City of Snohomish.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Friday, May 30

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

The Buzz: On the menu: tacos, tainted lettuce, free-range ostrich

While Trump was enjoying TACO Tuesday, RFK Jr. had his eye on a wobble of bird flu-stricken ostriches.

Schwab: We’re witnesses to a new China syndrome

What’s melting down now, with America’s retreat from the world, is our standing and economic influence.

If you need a permit to purchase a gun, how about for voting?

Gov. Bob Ferguson signed House Bill 1163 into law requiring, among other… Continue reading

Trump agenda: Walls, dome and ‘Fortress America’

I’ve been looking at what this administration has been trying to accomplish… Continue reading

GOP budget bill will hurt children, seniors, others

I’m outraged that the House has passed their reconciliation bill that deepens… Continue reading

Solar panels are visible along the rooftop of the Crisp family home on Monday, Nov. 14, 2022 in Everett, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: ‘Big, beautiful bill’ would take from our climate, too

Along with cuts to the social safety net, the bill robs investments in the clean energy economy.

A Lakewood Middle School eighth-grader (right) consults with Herald Opinion Editor Jon Bauer about the opinion essay he was writing for a class assignment. (Kristina Courtnage Bowman / Lakewood School District)
Youth Forum: Just what are those kids thinking?

A sample of opinion essays written by Lakewood Middle School eighth-graders as a class assignment.

A visitor takes in the view of Twin Lakes from a second floor unit at Housing Hope’s Twin Lakes Landing II Wednesday, Feb. 22, 2023, in Marysville, Washington. (Ryan Berry / The Herald)
Editorial: Housing Hope’s ‘Stone Soup’ recipe for community

With homelessness growing among seniors, an advocate calls for support of the nonprofit’s projects.

Comment: DOGE has failed; federal spending has only increased

Apart from some high-profile program eliminations, its cuts haven’t kept pace with other spending.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Thursday, May 29

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Make your opposition to Congress’ budget bill known

Cuts to SNAP and Medicaid, as passed recently in the House will… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.