Comment: Why is state spending $500K to study single-payer?

State lawmakers never approved such a working group, yet they put money in the budget to fund it.

By Roger Stark / For The Herald

In the last legislative session, members of the Washington state House and Senate considered bills that would set up a working group to find ways to impose a single-payer health care system on the residents of the state. Such a plan would potentially end private health care coverage in the state.

The idea is highly unpopular, so not surprisingly the working group bill failed to pass in either house; not even all of the majority Democrats would vote for it. Yet the working group is in place and meetings are scheduled. How can that be?

Even though neither bill passed, legislative leaders slipped funding for the working group into the final 2019-21 state budget. In other words, our elected officials declined to support the working group, but the top budget writers and legislative leaders essentially circumvented the normal legislative voting process and funded the group anyway.

The overall biennial budget for Washington state in 2019-21 is $52.4 billion. The $500,000 allocated for the single-payer working group is obviously not a large percent of the budget, but it still represents a half-million dollars of taxpayer money that could be spent on something people actually want.

And to what end? The vast majority of people in Washington don’t want a socialist single-payer system. In fact no state does. Even elected officials in Vermont realized at the eleventh hour that a mandatory single-payer system would add 35 percent to the state budget, so they repealed it. Colorado voters turned down a single-payer initiative when they learned of the astronomical cost. The liberal California legislature has repeatedly voted down a state-based, single-payer system because of a lack of a funding mechanism.

Liberals in Washington state undoubtedly believe that there is something different about the Evergreen State that would convince taxpayers to give up health insurance they like and pay much more in taxes for a government-run health care system they don’t like.

The working group members can spend their own time on the committee meetings, but spending a half-million of taxpayer dollars is irresponsible. Circumventing the Legislature and simply funding the working group through the budget is extremely arrogant and elitist. It shows a real lack of respect for voters, for taxpayers and for our legislative process.

This is not the first time budget writers in Olympia bypassed the legislative process to impose a costly new program. Without taking a formal vote in the Legislature on whether to expand Medicaid as allowed by the Affordable Care Act, budget writers simply added the expansion into the 2013-15 state budget. Now the program is in place permanently.

Their excuse at the time was that the ACA required states to expand Medicaid. That is not true. State leaders made the move after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 2012 that state officials could decide for themselves whether to expand Medicaid. Again, no specific vote on expanding Medicaid was taken by elected legislators in Washington state.

Circumventing the legislative process and simply taking a vote on the total budget allows personal line items to essentially become law. This is not compatible with a true representative government. It does provide cover for elected officials to deny culpability when voters and taxpayers realize these unpopular and costly measures have been instituted.

Government transparency and respect for taxpayers demand that our elected officials take formal votes on controversial issues and not simply rely on advancing these issues by burying them in the budget. It is time for elected leaders to be upfront with us. Instead of sneaking unpopular items into the budget, they should at least have the courage and honesty to hold a recorded vote first.

Dr. Roger Stark is the health care policy analyst for the Washington Policy Center.

Talk to us

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Monday, Dec. 6

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

A Swift bus and an Everett Transit bus travel north on Rucker Avenue on Saturday in Everett. (Sue Misao / The Herald)
Editorial: Help pick a route for Everett’s transit future

A joint study will gather information on whether to combine Everett Transit and Community Transit.

Burke: When patience wears thin, the ire runneth over

Judging by comments on news stories, the vaccinated have had it with the unvaccinated. And Trump.

Saunders: After criminal law reforms, ask if you feel safer

Laxer penalties for misdemeanors may be behind a rash of smash-and-grab thefts in California.

Comment: Some employers might actually benefit from unions

Unionized firms, such as UPS, have had better employee retention than nonunionized FedEx and others.

A map of the news deserts of the United States. White dots indicate daily newspapers; darker areas show the counties with the fewest — or no — daily newspapers; lighter areas show areas with more local news sources. (Washington Post)
Comment: When newspapers fold, no news is bad news

Communities without a local source of news see reduced civic engagement and election participation.

Robert J. Sutherland (Washington State House Republicans)
Editorial: State House covid rules won’t exclude GOP lawmakers

A requirement for vaccination only means those unvaccinated will have to attend sessions remotely.

An artist's rendering shows features planned for the first floor of an expansion of the Imagine Children's Museum. The area will include a representation of the old bicycle tree in Snohomish and an outdoorsy Camp Imagine. (Imagine Children's Museum)
Editorial: GivingTuesday offers chance to build better future

Organizations, such as Imagine Children’s Museum, need our support as we look past the pandemic.

School-age lead Emilee Swenson pulls kids around in a wagon at Tomorrow’s Hope child care center on Tuesday, Sept. 7, 2021 in Everett, Washington. A shortage of child care workers prompted HopeWorks, a nonprofit, to expand its job training programs. Typically, the programs help people with little or no work experience find a job. The new job training program is for people interested in becoming child care workers. (Andy Bronson / The Herald)
Editorial: Everett must make most of pandemic windfall

Using federal funds, the mayor’s office has outlined $20.7M in projects to address covid’s impacts.

Most Read