Comment: Why the Biden economy is actually pretty good

Biden has made his economic mistakes, but taking inflation in trade for recession was the right call.

By Karl W. Smith / Bloomberg Opinion

Americans are deeply disappointed in President Biden’s performance on the economy. Almost two-thirds of voters say that the country is on the wrong track, almost half say the economy will worsen next year and, by a 29-point margin, more expect inflation to get worse rather than better.

I certainly have had my criticisms of the Democrats’ economic policy. But it’s important to note what they got right; and ask what they could have done, and could do, better.

It’s important to review some recent history: When the global financial crisis struck in 2009, Washington acted quickly to stem the collapse and prevent a repeat of the Great Depression. Then they largely the dropped the ball. The recovery was slow, painful and resulted in millions of Americans becoming so discouraged that they left the workforce altogether.

Some economists argued at the time that this was the best that could be expected. Others of us argued that the solution was straightforward: The economy was suffering from a deficit of demand; that is, overall spending wasn’t enough to produce jobs for everyone willing to work. The goal of policy should have been to make up that deficit.

In particular, the nominal gross domestic product had fallen well below the trajectory it was on before the crisis. (Nominal GDP is the measure of a country’s output at current prices; real GDP is adjusted for inflation.) The Federal Reserve should have promised to keep interest rates low until it had made up the difference.

The intuition is that people don’t adjust for inflation as they go about their day and plan their lives. They take on mortgages, agree to salaries and start new businesses based on the actual dollar amounts involved. When suddenly they don’t have enough money, because of an economic crisis, their plans fall into disarray.

The solution to this dilemma is to bring the total amount of nominal income flowing through the economy back to previous levels. Then hiring will recover and the economy will enter a virtuous and self-reinforcing cycle.

Remarkably, this is almost precisely what has happened over the last year and a half. The U.S. economy went into a brief recession because of covid, but through a combination of fiscal relief and monetary support, nominal GDP is now back on track. As predicted, unemployment has fallen, hitting 4.2 percent last month, just 0.7 points higher than before the pandemic.

Yet this solution comes with a cost: above-average inflation during the pandemic itself. After all, if real GDP shrinks — and that’s what the recession was — then in order for the total volume of spending to remain the same, prices have to rise to make up for the shortfall. Indeed, that is also almost precisely what has happened.

The economic theory here is that a short period of inflation is a price worth paying to reduce unemployment. As a political strategy, however, it is a non-starter.

Some of this is surely due to poor communication on the White House’s part. For example, Biden could have been quicker to address the supply-chain slowdowns at the ports and shown more support to an oil and gas industry that is apprehensive not only about how covid will change consumer behavior but also about the administration’s climate policy.

More broadly, Biden should have been more candid about the choice the U.S. was facing: between a lingering recession and a short bout of inflation. He could have made the argument that his administration was not going to repeat the mistakes of the early 2010s. If he had, maybe Americans would have been more willing to accept rising prices.

Of course, it would be foolish to believe that any of this would have meaningfully changed Americans’ overall sense of the economy. Restoring nominal GDP to its pre-crisis trajectory is a real achievement, but it has unavoidably induced a period of rising prices. The public just doesn’t like inflation, no matter what economists or politicians might say. And while economists — or columnists — don’t’ have face the voters’ wrath, presidents do.

Karl W. Smith is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist. He was formerly vice president for federal policy at the Tax Foundation and assistant professor of economics at the University of North Carolina. He is also co-founder of the economics blog Modeled Behavior.

Talk to us

More in Opinion

Editorial cartoons for Monday, May 23

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Ballots for Tuesday's election are due by 8 p.m. (Sue Misao / The Herald)
Editorial: New districts, more make for vital election season

Voters should check to see if they’re in a new district and prepare for consequential elections.

Ferries pass on a crossing between Mukilteo and Whidbey Island. (Andy Bronson / Herald file)
Editorial: Up to graduates to take us where we want to go

A lack of workers has limited Amtrak and the state ferry system. Graduates need to train for those jobs.

The COVID-19 ward at Providence Regional Medical Center Everett in May 2020. (Andy Bronson / Herald file) 20200519
Editorial: Even after 1 million deaths, covid fight isn’t over

Most of us have put away masks, but case counts are rising again and vigilance is still paramount.

Burke: An exhaustive, exhausting list of what we can’t ignore

A lot has been thrown our way but there’s no comfort to be found in pretending we can just let it go.

Fed should be careful not to over-correct for inflation

The Federal Reserve and the Biden administration are now forced to deal… Continue reading

Rent control could ease homelessness

In the dictionary under “rent control,” it states “government regulation of the… Continue reading

More traffic officers needed to keep U.S. 2 moving

I’ve been traveling across Stevens Pass for over 60 years, mainly to… Continue reading

Saunders: California’s homelessness problem might unseat Newsom

The governor faces a challenge from an independent candidate who’s pointing to his failures on the issue.

Most Read