Commentary: Amazon’s interest in health care says something

Better regulation of PBMs — a pharmacy middleman — could lower drug prices for many patients.

By David L. Hall

Amazon has become one of the world’s largest companies thanks to its ability to capitalize on market inefficiencies. With recent reports indicating that nearly 1 in 4 patients are overpaying unknowingly for their prescriptions, it’s no surprise that the company considered turning its attention to health care.

Medical care consumes nearly 20 cents of every dollar we spend, so hospitals, health insurers, drug manufacturers and pharmacies seem ripe for disruption. So it was unsurprising to see Amazon almost, along with some partners, enter the health care marketplace.

What did surprise some observers, though, was the news that Amazon planned to focus on pharmacy benefit managers, or “PBMs,” which are the firms that administer drug plans for health insurers.

But this focus makes sense. Wedged between drug companies and pharmacies, PBMs manage prescription drug benefits for most Americans, from those enrolled in private health plans to those enrolled in Medicare. PBM’s profit handsomely each year, they’re growing quickly, and they’re the chief reason why drug prices are eating up an ever larger share of personal spending.

The Economist magazine recently performed an analysis of the U.S. health care system which found that 15 years ago middlemen, like PBMs, accounted for approximately 20 percent of industry profits. Today their share is 41 percent. By way of example, they cite, “Express Scripts earns billions while having less than $1 billion of physical plants and no disclosed investment in R&D. This year the combined profits of three wholesalers that few outsiders have heard of are expected to exceed those of Starbucks.”

Right now, PBMs process 2 in every 3 prescriptions — and just five companies: Express Scripts, CVS Health, Prime Therapeutics, OptumRx, and Diplomat Pharmacy control over 70 percent of the market. Thanks to this clout, PBMs can extract huge rebates and discounts from manufacturers. Indeed, they typically convince manufacturers to rebate 33 percent of a brand-name medicine’s list price, according to a recent study from the Berkeley Research Group.

Tough negotiations over price are fine. The problem, though, is that patients rarely see the benefits of these savings passed on to them. A majority of commercially insured patients’ spending for brand-name medicines is based on the full list price — not the discounted price negotiated by PBMs.

Sometimes, a patient’s “share” of a drug’s price actually exceeds the negotiated price of the drug! Fairness would direct the savings to the patient. But more often than not, PBMs and health insurers simply keep the difference in these situations.

It’s no wonder why the chief operating officer of Rite-Aid, which is booming in Washington state, calls his company’s PBM its “growth engine.”

The health care industry would benefit from innovation in the drug supply chain. Passing rebates on to patients at the point of sale is a great place to start. Doing so might hurt PBMs, but it’s a consumer benefit whose time is due.

David L. Hall is the executive director of the Pacific Northwest chapter of TRIO, the Transplant Recipients International Organization.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Saturday, May 3

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Scott Peterson walks by a rootball as tall as the adjacent power pole from a tree that fell on the roof of an apartment complex he does maintenance for on Wednesday, Nov. 20, 2024 in Lake Stevens, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Communities need FEMA’s help to rebuild after disaster

The scaling back or loss of the federal agency would drown states in losses and threaten preparedness.

Comment: RFK Jr., others need a better understanding of autism

Here’s what he’s missing regarding those like my daughter who are shaped — not destroyed — by autism.

Comment: Trump threatens state’s clean air, water, environment

Cuts to agencies and their staffs sidestep Congress’ authority and endanger past protection work.

Comment: Help update county’s ‘constitution’ on charter commission

Filing begins next week for positions on the panel that considers proposals for the county charter.

A view of the Eastglen Wetlands that run through the Eastglen development on Wednesday, Jan. 8, 2025 in Bothell. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald file photo)
Forum: Wetlands too important to be seen as a building site

An amendment to a county land use regulation would reduce wetland buffers, endangering critical lands.

Forum: A declaration that dependence can draw us to connections

We value independence, but forget that a simple request for help reminds us that people need people.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Friday, May 2

A sketcy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

County Council members Jared Mead, left, and Nate Nehring speak to students on Thursday, Jan. 30, 2025, during Civic Education Day at the Snohomish County Campus in Everett, Washington. (Will Geschke / The Herald)
Editorial: Students get a life lesson in building bridges

Two county officials’ civics campaign is showing the possibilities of discourse and government.

The Buzz: Imagine that; it’s our 100-day mark, too, Mr. President

Granted, you got more done, but we didn’t deport at 4-year-old U.S. citizen and cancer patient.

Schwab: Pronatalism and the birth of a nationalism

The Trumpian push for more births seems contradictory to its lack of concern for women and children.

Harrop: Democrats should heed Canada’s win against Trump

The Liberal Party and its leader, Mark Carney, played to identity politics: Canadian identity.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.