Commentary: Even Big Oil sees no need to relax methane rules

The White House’s move will save oil and gas companies little while adding to the climate disaster.

By the Los Angeles Times Editorial Board

There’s an important set of numbers included in the Trump administration’s announcement Aug. 29 that it plans to kill Obama-era requirements that oil and gas companies prevent methane from leaking out of new wells, pipelines and storage facilities. The proposed rollback, according to the Environmental Protection Agency, would save the $280-billion industry from $17 million to $19 million a year. Economically speaking, that’s peanuts. So, clearly, this deregulatory push isn’t about removing an onerous financial burden on an industry.

Rather, it’s rooted in President Trump’s almost visceral dislike for regulations of just about any stripe, as well as his goal of making the United States the world’s dominant producer of oil and gas. Global warming? Air quality? Not his concern.

“The Trump administration recognizes that methane is valuable,” EPA Administrator Andrew Wheeler said in announcing the move, and therefore that “the industry has an incentive to minimize leaks and maximize its use.” In other words, there’s no need for the government to tell the industry that it ought to do something because, well, it will do it anyway out of its own economic self-interest.

That’s not how the world works. And it fails to strike the right balance between the interests of the oil and gas industry — whose smaller players are agitating for the change even as some of the biggest ones oppose it — and the health and well-being of all the rest of us.

When released into the atmosphere, methane is by some estimates 30 times more potent as a heat-trapping gas than carbon dioxide, though it doesn’t linger as long. But because it has such a pronounced impact in the short term, it is vitally important that humankind minimize methane releases if we are to have any hope of limiting the rise in global temperatures to less than 2 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels, the goal set in the 2015 Paris climate accord. And, obviously, the proposed rule would make it even more difficult to hold that rise to 1.5 degrees, which many scientists believe is necessary to avoid some of the most devastating consequences of climate change.

The Trump administration dismisses any such concerns. At best it pays lip service to the notion that we need to reduce carbon emissions; most often it just ignores the topic, silences its own scientists and tries to expand the amount of public land available for drilling. This is the road to environmental disaster.

Yet that is precisely what the EPA is supposed to guard against. Trump turned the agency against the best interests of the nation when he named Scott Pruitt, who as Oklahoma attorney general had filed more than a dozen lawsuits challenging the agency’s authority, to be its leader. The president didn’t help matters when he replaced the ethics-challenged Pruitt with Andrew Wheeler, a former industry lobbyist. Foxes and henhouses come to mind.

The rollback of the methane-capture rules is just part of the administration’s attack on industry regulations in general. One of Trump’s first acts as president was to order his regulators to rescind two existing rules for every new rule they wanted to add, a silly and dangerous approach to deregulation. The Brookings Institution is tracking nearly 200 regulations the administration has repealed or is trying to repeal, some with more potentially devastating consequences than others.

If regulations outlive their usefulness, fail to meet the intended goals or have unintended consequences, then it is prudent to revisit them and repeal as necessary. Trump’s two-for-one approach puts quantity ahead of quality.

Trump also issued an early executive order directly targeting the energy sector as part of his Promoting Energy Independence and Economic Growth agenda, in which he ordered the repeal of regulations that potentially “burden the development or use of domestically produced energy resources.” Prime among them: oil and gas.

The relentless drive to drill, pump and burn more fossil fuels goes against everything the scientific world is telling us we need to do to avoid the worst effects of global warming. We’re already seeing the results of a warming world with the shrinking Arctic ice cap, larger and more intense storms and floods, and the wildfires that have ravaged California. Failing to recognize the human role in these events, and to continue to push politics that make them worse instead of better, requires a deliberately distorted view of reality. Like a funhouse mirror, except there’s nothing funny about it.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Sunday, Nov. 16

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

FILE — President Donald Trump and Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick display a chart detailing tariffs, at the White House in Washington, on Wednesday, April 2, 2025. The Justices will hear arguments on Wednesday, Nov. 5, 2025 over whether the president acted legally when he used a 1977 emergency statute to unilaterally impose tariffs.(Haiyun Jiang/The New York Times)
Editorial: Public opinion on Trump’s tariffs may matter most

The state’s trade interests need more than a Supreme Court ruling limiting Trump’s tariff power.

FILE — Wind turbines in Rio Vista, Calif. on Sept. 1, 2023. Gov. Gavin Newsom, Democrat of California, on Tuesday, Nov. 11, 2025, cast himself as the “stable and reliable” American partner to the world, called a White House proposal to open offshore drilling in the waters off California “disgraceful” and urged his fellow Democrats to recast climate change as a “cost of living issue.” (Jim Wilson/The New York Times)
Comment: U.S. climate efforts didn’t hurt economy; they grew it

Even as U.S. population and the economy grew substantially, greenhouse gas emissions stayed constant.

Welch column unfairly targeted transgender girls

When Todd Welch was first brought on as a regular columnist for… Continue reading

Did partisan rhetoric backfire on Snohomish city candidates?

Something interesting happened recently in the city of Snohomish mayoral and city… Continue reading

Comment: From opposite ends of crime, a plea for justice reform

A survivor of crime and an incarceree support a bill to forge better outcomes for both communities.

Comment: Misnamed Fix Our Forest Act would worsen wildfire risk

The U.S. Senate bill doesn’t fund proven strategies and looks to increase harvest in protective forests.

Comment: City governments should stay out of the grocery market

Rather than run its own grocery stores, government should get out of the way of private companies.

Forum: Grading students needs shift from testing to achievement

Standardized tests are alienating students and teachers. Focus education on participation and goals.

Forum: Varied interests for ecology, civil rights can speak together

A recent trip to Portland revealed themes common to concerns for protecting salmon, wildlife and civil rights.

Editorial: Welcome guidance on speeding public records duty

The state attorney general is advancing new rules for compliance with the state’s public records law.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Saturday, Nov. 15

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.