Commentary: Remove disincentives to live-organ donation

Live kidney donations often pose hardships for those giving up a life-saving – and cost-saving — organ.

By Bloomberg Opinion editors

It’s illegal to pay for a human kidney, but it’s perfectly fine to beg for one. So if you’ve driven through Alabama, Indiana, South Carolina, Manhattan or Los Angeles recently, you may have seen billboards taken out by patients urging passers-by to part with their kidneys. Hundreds more patients seek living donors online; others search abroad (often with grim results).

There just aren’t enough organs to go around. For every 1,000 Americans who pledge to donate their kidneys after death, only three die in a way that permits a transplant. That frees up about 14,000 kidneys a year — about 1 for every 7 people on the 90,000-strong transplant waiting list. The longer they wait — five years, on average — the sicker they get. Every day, some 13 people die waiting.

That’s why living donors are so important; and why donations should be encouraged rather than penalized.

Roughly 6,000 Americans donate one of their kidneys each year, typically to a family member or friend. It’s hardly an easy decision. Complications are rare, and healthy donors generally don’t experience long-term problems; some evidence suggests they actually live longer than average.

But all surgeries carry risks, and donors have to plan for a two- to six-week recovery period. This puts them at risk of being laid off. They might also find themselves denied health or life insurance. Donors should be protected from these costs not just to reward their generosity, but because their selflessness provides clear public benefits.

The gain to the recipient, of course, is obvious. With a kidney transplant, a patient can live a relatively normal life. Without it, he or she must spend an average of five to 10 years on dialysis; a costly, grueling process that often interferes with work and family, followed by an early death. Dialysis patients report lower quality of life and more complications than transplant patients. They are less independent and die sooner. There’s a reason doctors consider kidney transplants the treatment of choice. And patient outcomes tend to be best of all with living-donor kidneys.

But transplants aren’t just better for patients; they’re a better deal for taxpayers. A year of dialysis costs nearly three times as much as a transplant, and Medicare covers about 80 percent of dialysis costs for most patients. That’s an outlay of $35 billion each year. Every transplant saves taxpayers about $146,000 over the course of the recipient’s lifetime. Researchers estimate that if every American who needed a kidney could get one, it would save taxpayers $12 billion a year.

If everyone benefits from living donations, then states should take action to encourage them; and indeed, many states are. Colorado, Idaho, Maine, Maryland and New York have all passed bills to encourage living organ donations and prevent donors from being discriminated against. And at the federal level, a bipartisan group of representatives in February introduced the Living Donor Protection Act, which would ensure donors can take up to three months off work to recover and would prohibit insurers from limiting coverage or charging higher premiums to live organ donors. These are good first steps.

Even bolder thinking may also be in order; for example, revisiting the 1984 law that bans payment for organs. If the government gave $45,000 to each living donor as “an expression of appreciation by society,” as some nephrologists have proposed, it would save up to 10,000 lives a year and taxpayers would still come out more than $10 billion ahead. Such a plan could end the kidney shortage at a stroke. The prospect of the impoverished in effect selling their organs is admittedly disturbing, but is it any more disturbing than the fact that, as things stand, the wealthier, whiter, and younger you are, the more likely you are to receive one of those rare living-donor kidneys?

Still, one step at a time. Before debating new incentives for organ donation, at least take down the disincentives already in place. Nobody should lose a job or be denied health insurance for saving a life.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

SEATTLE, WASHINGTON - OCTOBER 10: A Seattle Sonics fan holds a sign before the Rain City Showcase in a preseason NBA game between the LA Clippers and the Utah Jazz at Climate Pledge Arena on October 10, 2023 in Seattle, Washington. (Photo by Steph Chambers/Getty Images)
Editorial: Seahawks’ win whets appetite for Sonics’ return

A Super Bowl win leaves sports fans hungering for more, especially the return of a storied NBA franchise.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Thursday, Feb. 12

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Comment: Maybe we should show the EPA our insurance bills

While it has renounced the ‘endagerment finding’ that directs climate action, insurance costs are only growing.

City allowing Everett business to continue polluting

Is it incompetency, corporatocracy or is the City of Everett just apathetic… Continue reading

Good reason for members of military to refuse illegal orders

Sen. Mark Kelly, D-Ariz., texted me saying President Trump “called for me… Continue reading

Support U.S. assistance of Ukraine in fight against Russia

As we enter the fourth year of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine,… Continue reading

Comment: Listen carefully to the things that Trump can’t unsay

What Trump said about ‘nationalizing elections’ shows the unconstitutional lengths he’ll go to.

A Sabey Corporation data center in East Wenatchee, Wash., on Nov. 3, 2024. The rural region is changing fast as electricians from around the country plug the tech industry’s new, giant data centers into its ample power supply. (Jovelle Tamayo/The New York Times)
Editorial: Protect utililty ratepayers as data centers ramp up

State lawmakers should move ahead with guardrails for electricity and water use by the ‘cloud’ and AI.

Advocates for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities rallied on the state capitol steps on Jan. 17. The group asked for rate increases for support staff and more funding for affordable housing. (Laurel Demkovich/Washington State Standard)
Editorial: Limit redundant reviews of those providing care

If lawmakers can’t boost funding for supported living, they can cut red tape that costs time.

FILE — Federal agents arrest a protester during an active immigration enforcement operation in a Minneapolis neighborhood, Jan. 13, 2026. The chief federal judge in Minnesota excoriated Immigration and Customs Enforcement on Wednesday, Jan. 28, saying it had violated nearly 100 court orders stemming from its aggressive crackdown in the state and had disobeyed more judicial directives in January alone than “some federal agencies have violated in their entire existence.” (David Guttenfelder/The New York Times)
Editorial: Ban on face masks assures police accountability

Concerns for officer safety can be addressed with investigation of threats and charges for assaults.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, Feb. 11

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

toon
Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, Feb. 10

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.