Commentary: Tit-for-tat Boeing, Airbus tariffs help no one

Boeing won a round before the WTO, but the Trump administration should reconsider imposing tariffs.

By Bloomberg Opinion editors

The world’s longest running and most expensive trade dispute looks set to end in a destructive shootout; that is, if the U.S. and European Union don’t show some sense.

On Wednesday, the World Trade Organization authorized the U.S. to proceed with tariffs on as much as $7.5 billion in European exports, likely including planes, aircraft parts and luxury goods. Unless President Donald Trump’s administration exercises some restraint in imposing these new duties, the two sides are headed for a costly escalation.

The immediate dispute concerned aircraft makers. In 2004, the U.S. brought a case at the WTO accusing Airbus — a consortium backed by Britain, France, Germany and Spain — of benefiting from illegal state aid. Europe lodged a similar complaint against the American aerospace giant Boeing. The two sides have been trading claims and counterclaims ever since, in what has turned into the biggest case in the WTO’s history. After accepting the U.S. claims, the trade body this week authorized the new tariffs as a remedy; the EU’s case will most likely be decided next year.

Although the Trump administration will surely tout this decision as a victory, there’s not much to celebrate. Imposing such tariffs will raise prices for U.S. consumers and act as a drag on the American economy. Airbus’ factory in Mobile, Alabama, depends on imported parts to assemble the A320 family of jets; plenty of U.S. airlines rely on them as well, and have been sounding the alarm. Nor will the EU take this punishment lying down: It’s threatening to impose duties on some $4 billion in U.S. exports if Trump goes ahead. If it prevails in its case against Boeing, it could gain authorization for even costlier measures.

Such tit-for-tat tariffs are bad enough. But the dispute could do deeper damage to the $1.3 trillion trade relationship between the two sides, to everyone’s detriment. Talks on a new free-trade deal, already stalling, could be fatally undermined. Other mutual priorities — such as pressuring China to reform its trade practices or overhauling the global trading system — will surely suffer. And tensions between putative allies will needlessly escalate.

More broadly, Trump’s chaotic trade wars are already having profoundly negative effects on the world economy. A WTO forecast published this week predicted sharply slowing global trade growth. Last month, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development warned that “escalating trade conflicts are taking an increasing toll on confidence and investment, adding to policy uncertainty, aggravating risks in financial markets and endangering already weak growth prospects worldwide.”

With fears of recession rising, the last thing the world needs is another costly and senseless battle between the U.S. and Europe. If it were possible to roll back the clock, both sides would be better off. In the early 1990s, the U.S. and the EU had an agreement on support for the large jet-makers, but it fell apart over allegations that Europe was breaching its terms. Finding a similar accommodation now would be far preferable to the endless Boeing-Airbus score-settling.

The WTO has done its best with this overwhelmingly complex case. But the fact is, it relies on the goodwill of its members in seeking resolution, not just retribution. In the today’s context, that seems depressingly unrealistic.

The above editorial appears on Bloomberg Opinion.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Friday, Sept. 12

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

An image taken from a website attack advertisement targeting Everett school board member Anna Marie Jackson Laurence. (laurenceletusdown.com)
Editorial: Attack ads an undeserved slander of school official

Ads against an Everett school board candidate are a false and unfair attack on a public servant.

Schwab: Flattery gets one everything if you’re Putin or Trump

Putin puffed up Trump to get what he wanted; Trump has made puffery the coin of his realm.

Klein: Charlie Kirk lived for the right to argue; we all should

You don’t have to agree with any of his opinions to see the danger to all in his violent silencing.

Douthat: Why Charlie Kirk’s message resonated with young right

His was a different kind of campus conservatism, both rebellious, relaxed and approachable.

Comment: GOP seems intent on losing on health care concerns

Their rollback of Medicaid and attacks on vaccines are likely to cost them control of the House.

Comment: Are Democrats using the wrong words or the wrong ideas?

A liberal group’s memo to party officials on how to phrase their messages seems to miss the point.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Thursday, Sept. 11

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Comment: Florida’s vaccine mistake won’t say behind its border

It wants to end a mandate for school kids, risking the spread of disease. Other states are fighting back.

Snohomish Council, Pos. 4: Merrill kept promise to clean up lake

He was in the dentist’s office, and the first words out of… Continue reading

Florida health official’s vaccine stance misunderstands public health

I just became aware of Florida Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo’s comments and… Continue reading

Douthat: Trump’s imperial presidency may not end with him

Unless Congress or the Supreme Court rein him in, the next president, regardless of party, benefits.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.