Debate scorecard added up to a tie for Bush, Gore

  • David Broder / Washington Post columnist
  • Wednesday, October 4, 2000 9:00pm
  • Opinion

WAUWATOSA, Wis. — On the scorecard I kept while watching the first presidential debate with a group of undecided and persuadable voters in this Milwaukee suburb, both candidates accomplished most of their goals. Their performance reinforced my feeling that Al Gore and George W. Bush have developed into very capable contenders, with clearly defined policy differences and leadership styles.

They are giving the country the kind of choice it deserves.

I must report that many of the 10 folks around the table objected to the candidates’ repeatedly breaking the time limits and ground rules they themselves had set. It struck some of them as a metaphor for the way politicians say one thing and do another. Some of them wished a third party — either an independent candidate or a more assertive moderator than Jim Lehrer appeared to be — had been there to tell Gore and Bush, "Just answer the question and move on."

Gore, most of them said, looked "more presidential," but Bush clearly held his own, and — just as the overnight polls indicated — no votes were won or lost around our table.

Looking back at the list of five goals for each candidate I had set down in a previous column, I give them high marks. In summary:

(1) Bush did persist in pushing his education record and proposals for school reform. When education became the topic, he perked up noticeably and the fatigue I thought I had seen halfway through the 90 minutes instantly disappeared. Our voters also thought Bush came on strong in the last half-hour.

(2) When Lehrer raised the character question, Bush did suggest that the Buddhist temple visit and "no controlling legal authority" displayed a contempt on Gore’s part for higher standards. But, when given a second opening, he failed to do what Bill Bradley had done when he debated Gore: Make the case that a candidate who evades the truth cannot earn the trust a president needs to govern.

(3) Bush did repeatedly assert that he had governed in a bipartisan way in Texas and is prepared to do the same in Washington. And he argued that partisanship had kept the Clinton-Gore administration from achieving many of its goals. But he has room to expand his indictment of the political climate of Washington, which much of the public loathes.

(4) He made no verbal gaffes. The claim that he is language-impaired is no longer plausible.

(5) He was relaxed, but not particularly light-hearted. The one humorous shot — that Gore had invented not only the Internet but the calculator — came across as rehearsed. Now that he has displayed some depth, Bush can afford to let more of his personality and good humor show.

Gore did equally well on my scorecard. To wit:

(1) Gore went after the Bush tax cut from the opening moment to the close, attacking the centerpiece of his opponent’s economic plan on both fairness and policy grounds. What he did not do, of course, is challenge the assumption that vast trillions of surplus are out there to be exploited, because his own budget, no less than Bush’s, depends on the presumption that these projected surpluses will materialize. Nobody wants to be the Grinch.

(2) He did less to question Bush’s Texas record than I had expected, perhaps because he wanted to drive home the tax issue and perhaps because he is saving the environmental-social policy stuff, where Bush is vulnerable, for later debates.

(3) On what I called "the three Cs" of Clinton, Court and Congress, Gore bragged of the administration’s economic record, virtually ignored the "threat" of an unchecked Republican Congress and focused hard on the possibility of Bush appointees reversing the Supreme Court’s support of abortion rights. I thought Bush was sending an important signal by saying he would not try to overturn the recent FDA approval of the abortion pill RU-486 — strengthening my belief that abortion rights are now irreversible in this country. But Gore clearly wants to keep the issue alive.

(4) Gore ventured close to the borderline of the slow-paced, pedantic, condescending tone he sometimes has shown in the past, but rarely crossed it. His theatrical sighs — indicating disbelief at Bush’s statements — were a subject of comment, and our voters, like many others, wearied of hearing the phrase "the wealthiest 1 percent."

(5) Surprisingly, Gore did nothing to try to rattle Bush. This tactic, which he has used in almost all his past debates, perhaps has become too much his trademark for him to risk repeating it. But if the race stays as close as it now looks to be, I would not be surprised to see Gore revert to form.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

Editorial cartoons for Sunday, May 26

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

FILE - A worker cleans a jet bridge at Paine Field in Everett, Wash., before passengers board an Alaska Airlines flight, March 4, 2019. Seattle-based Alaska Airlines owns Horizon Air. Three passengers sued Alaska Airlines on Thursday, Nov. 2, 2023, saying they suffered emotional distress from an incident last month in which an off-duty pilot, was accused of trying to shut down the engines of a flight from Washington state to San Francisco. (AP Photo/Ted S. Warren, File)
Editorial: FAA bill set to improve flight safety, experience

With FAA reauthorization, Congress proves it’s capable of legislating and not just throwing shade.

The author’s 19-year-old niece, Veronika, was among seven people killed by a gunman on May 23, 2014, in Isla Vista, Calif.
Comment: I lost my niece to gun violence 10 years ago this week

Since then, Washington state voters and lawmakers have taken bold steps to discourage gun violence.

Comment: Reroute of Harvey Field runway not worth flood risk

Without a projected need for expansion, the work risks flooding impacts to wildlife and residents.

Expanding grants will help more students get college degrees

For good or ill, the American labor force is being automated. To… Continue reading

Was I-5’s long closure necessary?

It seems there needs to be a rational discussion and possibly a… Continue reading

Balloon releases are harming wildlife

When will the media stop perpetuating the myth that releasing balloons into… Continue reading

1oth LD, Senate race: St. Clair brings experience to post

We are fortunate to have an outstanding Democratic candidate running for State… Continue reading

FILE — TikTok content creators at a news conference with several House Democrats on Capitol Hill on Tuesday, March 12, 2024. A bill that would force a sale of TikTok by its Chinese owner, ByteDance — or ban it outright — was passed by the Senate and is expected to be signed into law by President Biden; now the process is likely to get even more complicated. (Haiyun Jiang/The New York Times)
Comment: Why TikTok’s lawsuit of federal ban isn’t all talk

The social media app’s makers are challenging the ban on legitimate First Amendment grounds.

The vessel Tonga Chief, a 10-year-old Singaporean container ship, is moored at the Port of Everett Seaport in November, 2023, in Everett. (Ryan Berry / The Herald file photo)
Editorial: Leave port tax issue for campaign, not the ballot

Including “taxing district” on ballot issue to expand the Port of Everett’s boundaries is prejudicial.

Snohomish County Councilmembers Nate Nehring, left, and Jared Mead, speaking, take turns moderating a panel including Tulip Tribes Chairwoman Teri Gobin, Stanwood Mayor Sid Roberts and Lynnwood Mayor Christine Frizzell during the Building Bridges Summit on Monday, Dec. 4, 2023, at Western Washington University Everett in Everett, Washington. (Ryan Berry / The Herald)
Editorial: Candidates, voters have campaign promises to make

Two county officials’ efforts to improve political discourse skills are expanding to youths and adults.

Attorney General Bob Ferguson speaks to a reporter as his 2024 gubernatorial campaign launch event gets underway in Seattle, on Saturday, Sept. 9, 2023. ( Jerry Cornfield/Washington State Standard)
Editorial: Recruiting two Bob Fergusons isn’t election integrity

A GOP activist paid the filing fee for two gubernatorial candidates who share the attorney general’s name.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.