Does city think tactics win over voters?

On April 17, the city of Bothell is trying a second time in less than six months to put the North East West Bothell Annexation vote before the citizens of unincorporated Snohomish County. The majority of the citizens within the annexation area voted down the city’s proposal last November.

At least with the November vote, there was plenty of advance notice to everyone affected. This time, it’s a different story. The city pushed through a last-minute resolution on Feb. 21 to put an annexation vote on the April 17 ballot. The special election date meant the city had to get their application into the state auditor shortly following the council meeting.

What I find disgusting is that the “yes” campaign had several political signs installed throughout the annexation area less than 24 hours following that council vote on Feb. 21. They must have had advance notice in order to have so many new custom signs made and installed so quickly. It disgusts me that the city has been working so closely with the “yes” people, with total disregard to the “no” people, who were taken by surprise with the April 17 ballot.

The favoritism is blatant. How does this council expect the “no” voters to embrace the idea of becoming a citizen of Bothell after this apparent deceit? If the annexation does pass, the current council can and will be voted out and replaced by those citizens who were ignored and treated with so little respect. If the “no” campaign is victorious once again, the city has only their council and themselves to blame.

Pam Johnson

Bothell

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, Dec. 10

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

FILE — Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. speaks alongside President Donald Trump during an event announcing a drug pricing deal with Pfizer in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, Sept. 30, 2025. Advisers to Kennedy appear poised to make consequential changes to the childhood vaccination schedule, delaying a shot that is routinely administered to newborns and discussing big changes to when or how other childhood immunizations are given. (Pete Marovich/The New York Times)
Editorial: As CDC fades, others must provide vaccine advice

A CDC panel’s recommendation on the infant vaccine for hepatitis B counters long-trusted guidance.

Welch: State’s business climate stifling; lawmakers aren’t helping

Now 45th for business in a recent 50-state survey, new tax proposals could make things even worse.

Douthat: White House needs more Christianity in its nationalism

Aside from blanket statements, the Trump administration seems disinterested in true Christian priorities.

Comment: Renewing ACA tax credits is a life or death issue

If subsidies aren’t renewed, millions will end coverage and put off life-saving preventative care.

Comment: CDC vaccine panel’s hep B reversal leads parents astray

It isn’t empowering parents to make their own decision; it’s misleading them in a dangerous direction.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, Dec. 9

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Comment: FDA’s vaccine memo reckless, dangerous to public health

It offers no supporting evidence for its claims of children’s deaths and talks vaguely of broad changes.

Bouie: Support efforts of those helping meet needs in your area

In every committee, groups strive to meet the needs of others who lack proper shelter and nutrition.

French: Immigrant outreach answers current darkness with light

New Life Centers of Chicago answers the call in Leviticus to love the stranger as one’s self.

Comment: Using SNAP as leverage was bad idea first time around

The White House says it intends to suspend food aid in blue states that refuse to surrender data on recipients.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.