I disagree with The Herald reader who says that e-readers are not better than books. (Friday letter, “E-readers aren’t better than books.”) Each form has its advantages and disadvantages but, as a Kindle owner, I prefer the e-reader.
First, when I hear about a new book that interests me, I order it from Amazon and have it on my Kindle in less than a minute. For example, I heard the announcement on Tuesday evening that Julian Barnes is this year’s winner of the prestigious Man Booker Prize. On Wednesday morning I read an article about his book and ordered it for my Kindle. By Thursday evening I had finished the book. All of this without ever leaving the comfort of my home and having to make a trip to a bookstore or library.
Second, I like the adjustable font size of the Kindle, which enables me to turn any book into a large-print edition. Readability is important for old eyes like mine.
Third, the Kindle is perfect for travel. I used to agonize over what books, and how many, to pack in a small suitcase. Now I put some books on my Kindle, put my Kindle in a large pocket in my purse, and off I go.
Fourth, e-books do not take up shelf space. When I finish a book I do not have to put it on a shelf, take it back to the library, or donate it to charity.
As for the need to charge an e-reader, the solution is simple. Plug it in to recharge at night while you are asleep and in the morning you’ll be ready to read again.
At the age of 72, I’m not worried about the longevity of my e-reader and whether I will be able to read the e-books I own in 20 years. I’m focused on the present and the near future.
E-readers are not perfect, but they are wonderful. If you don’t own one, ask Santa to bring you a Kindle for Christmas.
Judy Kessinger
Mill Creek
Talk to us
> Give us your news tips.
> Send us a letter to the editor.
> More Herald contact information.
