A supporter holds up a petition for Initiative 1433, a ballot measure to raise Washington state’s minimum wage and allow all workers in the state to earn paid sick leave, in Everett, in March 2016. The passage of the minimum wage increase was among the top news stories in Washington in 2016. (Elaine Thompson /Associated Press file photo)

A supporter holds up a petition for Initiative 1433, a ballot measure to raise Washington state’s minimum wage and allow all workers in the state to earn paid sick leave, in Everett, in March 2016. The passage of the minimum wage increase was among the top news stories in Washington in 2016. (Elaine Thompson /Associated Press file photo)

Editorial: A new problem with paid signature gathering

An unpaid bill for signatures could cloud voter support for a change to the state’s affirmative action law.

By The Herald Editorial Board

Add one more drawback to the use of paid signature gatherers to qualify initiatives and referendums for the ballot in Washington state:

Sometimes the gatherers don’t get paid.

As The Herald’s Jerry Cornfield reported Wednesday, Citizen Solutions, a firm that hires workers to gather voters’ signatures for political petitions, is suing the One Washington Equity Campaign for $1.2 million, claiming that the campaign has yet to pay it $3 for each of the 395,000 “John Hancocks” it collected to put an initiative before the Legislature this year. Initiative 1000 would allow for recruitment goals that consider minority candidates for state jobs, education and contracting, easing state restrictions on affirmative action policies.

Stick with us, this gets a little complicated.

The initiative, which state lawmakers adopted earlier this year, was challenged shortly after its passage by a campaign seeking to put the issue before voters and give them an up-or-down choice. The opponents, Reject R-88 — earlier known as Let People Vote — hired its own signature-gathering firm, National Ballot Access, to put Referendum 88 on the November ballot. The difference: Reject R-88 has made payments to its signature firm, about $887,000, as of July 30, according to the state Public Disclosure Commission.

ADVERTISEMENT
0 seconds of 0 secondsVolume 0%
Press shift question mark to access a list of keyboard shortcuts
00:00
00:00
00:00
 

One Washington Equity Campaign’s unpaid bill is now hanging over efforts to convince voters to approve R-88 to keep I-1000 on the books as adopted.

With One Washington now $1.3 million in debt, an unaffiliated campaign has started up to urge voter support for R-88. But that has raised objections from Citizens Solutions. An attorney for the signature gatherer claims the new campaign, Washington Fairness Campaign to Approve I-1000, should be held liable for the earlier campaign’s debts.

That would be up to a court to decide, but the controversy could color voters’ opinions regarding their decision on R-88’s adoption or rejection of I-1000.

Initiatives and referendums are a cherished part of the state’s history of citizen-initiated legislative efforts, one that voters have taken seriously; any lack of clarity on an issue’s provisions or controversy regarding the campaign often prompt caution among voters and a rejection of the ballot measure.

Christian Sinderman, a consultant for Washington Fairness, admitted as much to Cornfield: “It’s frustrating that this is hanging over the conversation.”

One Washington’s debt could be traced back to its choice in signature gatherers. As Cornfield notes, Initiative 1000 has the backing of high-profile and bipartisan current and former state officials, including Gov. Jay Inslee, and former governors Chris Gregoire, Gary Locke and Dan Evans, as well as Amazon, Microsoft, unions and progressive groups.

Ample donations from that core should have been a gimme, but they lagged, perhaps because of the background of Citizen Solutions, specifically its long relationship with initiative promoter Tim Eyman, who’s responsible for years of ballot measures unpopular with I-1000’s key supporters.

Opponents of paid-signature gathering for ballot measures often are criticized as public policy romantics for believing that money can be removed from citizen initiative process. And the track record for making the ballot does show greater success for measures that employ signature gatherers than volunteer efforts passing around petitions.

Allowing campaigns to pay those collecting signatures has been allowed in the state since 1994, when a lawsuit overturned state law, which had previously held that paying people to gather signatures left the process open to fraud, because some might be pressured to sign who were not registered voters or had already signed.

The Secretary of State’s Office painstakingly works to ensure the validity of signatures, and encourages campaigns to collect additional signatures above the minimum requirement to make up for those that are invalidated.

Yet, doubts about the process go back decades — a century in fact — as seen in editorial in the Eugene (Oregon) Register from 1913 and cited in a 2003 article in the Montana Law Review: “Everyone knows that under the present system petitions do not express real opinion. They are signed for a variety of reasons, among which are a desire to be rid of the solicitor or to help him earn a day’s wages, and the natural tendency to do that which is requested providing it costs nothing.”

The controversy over One Washington’s unpaid bill may now cost I-1000 the support of voters with just the slightest doubt about the measure’s validity and how it was put before the Legislature.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Monday, May 19

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Comment: Cuts to Medicaid will make fentanyl fight harder

Medicaid’s expansion is helping many get the addiction treatment they need, reversing the crisis.

Comment: PBS, NPR need funding, and a good shake-up

PBS’s best dramas come from British TV. It needs to produce its own money-makers like ‘Downton Abbey.’

Saunders: Why did Tapper wait until now to admit Biden’s decline?

It was clear to voters long before Biden dropped out. Yet, now the CNN host has a book to sell.

Wildfire smoke builds over Darrington on Friday, Sept. 11, 2020 in Darrington, Wa. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Loss of research funds threat to climate resilience

The Trump administration’s end of a grant for climate research threatens solutions communities need.

Sarah Weiser / The Herald
Air Force One touches ground Friday morning at Boeing in Everett.
PHOTO SHOT 02172012
Editorial: There’s no free lunch and no free Air Force One

Qatar’s offer of a 747 to President Trump solves nothing and leaves the nation beholden.

The Washington State Legislature convenes for a joint session for a swearing-in ceremony of statewide elected officials and Governor Bob Ferguson’s inaugural address, March 15, 2025.
Editorial: 4 bills that need a second look by state lawmakers

Even good ideas, such as these four bills, can fail to gain traction in the state Legislature.

Goldberg: How did so many Democrats miss Biden’s infirmity?

Democrats need to own up to the cover-up now while there’s time to earn back voters’ confidence.

In the summer of 2021, members of the Skagit River System Cooperative counted fish in the restored estuary of Leque Island near Stanwood. What they found was encouraging. (Chuck Taylor / The Herald) 20210817
Comment: Ignoring the climate choice to adapt or die

The loss of funding for climate adaptation science will leave regions to weather impacts on their own.

Reverse Congress librarian’s unjust firing

I am beyond heartbroken by the unceremonious firing of Dr. Carla Hayden,… Continue reading

Should states handle issue of immigration?

OK, here we go again. The southern states have been screaming ‘states’… Continue reading

Candidates without opponents should decline donations

No candidates registered to run against Jared Mead or Nate Nehring for… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.