Editorial: ‘Bathroom’ initiative plays on unwarranted fears

By The Herald Editorial Board

A little more than two weeks remain before supporters of Initiative 1552 must submit the signatures of at least 260,000 registered Washington state voters to qualify their measure for the general election ballot in November.

While the initiative process is a venerable tradition in Washington state and gives citizens the ability to make direct appeals to the voters, not every proposal deserves the support of voters and a spot on the ballot.

Such is the case with I-1552, which would repeal protections in the state’s anti-discrimination law, passed in 2006 and with rules adopted in 2015 that extended protections to the state’s LGBT citizens.

Washington is one of 19 states, which along with 200 U.S. cities, have prohibited discrimination based on gender identity. The state’s Human Rights Commission in 2015 implemented rules regarding sexual orientation and gender identity, providing practical guidance on the 2006 anti-discrimination law. Among them was a rule that says a transgender person can’t be required to use a “gender segregated” restroom or locker room that is inconsistent with his or her gender identity, meaning a transgender person who identifies as a female must be allowed to use a women’s restroom.

The law, simply, allows transgender men and women to use restrooms, locker rooms and similar facilities that fit the gender with which they identify, respecting their dignity and recognizing everyone’s desire to use such facilities without harassment.

In its desperation to repeal those rules, supporters of the initiative have misstated the intent and language of the law and played on baseless fears.

On its website, JustWantPrivacy.org, supporters make wild claims that the state’s anti-discrimination law now allows any man to enter a women’s locker room and declare his right to be there, makes indecent exposure legal in those facilities and further absurdly warns that the law forces “little girls to share their gym showers with grown men.”

That isn’t happening. Indecent exposure, voyeurism and related crimes remain strictly prohibited under state law and are addressed by law enforcement. In fact, in the states and cities where the rights of transgendered people have been protected, no increase in public safety incidents has been reported.

If I-1552 became law, might you expect instead to see self-appointed restroom monitors asking to check your ID — or something more invasive of privacy — to prove your birth gender? Yep, that’s a ridiculous notion, too, but it shows how unenforceable and silly I-1552 would be.

What it would do is leave transgendered people open to greater harassment than they already face. Who would feel comfortable if a transgendered man, one who identifies and dresses as a man, is compelled to use a women’s restroom or locker room? The same goes for a transgender woman who is told she can only use a men’s locker room.

The need to extend such protection to transgendered individuals is clear: A 2015 nationwide study by the National Center for Transgender Equality found that 54 percent of transgender people reported being verbally harassed when they attended school, 24 percent reported physical attacks and 13 percent reported sexual assaults because they were transgender.

The initiative singles out schools for financial harm, opening them up to lawsuits — with fines of up to $5,000 for every incident of noncompliance as well as punitive damages — if a transgendered student is allowed to use a facility that doesn’t align with their gender at birth.

And it would open up Washington state to the economic boycotts that North Carolina and other states experienced when so-called “bathroom bills” were adopted. North Carolina only recently repealed the most objectionable parts of its law, after it lost NCAA tournaments and substantial convention business.

Supporters of Initiative 1552 have until July 7 to turn in at least 260,000 signatures, although the Secretary of State’s office recommends at least 325,000 names to allow for invalid signatures. The campaign, on its website, claims it has collected 119,000 as of June 14, though it recently accepted a $50,000 donation that could help it fund its collection of more signatures.

I-1552 represents a gross misrepresentation of who transgendered people are, assigns dangerous and insulting stereotypes to them, and by barring them from restrooms and similar facilities, would deny them public access to a simple human comfort.

The voters of Washington state rejected a similar, although less punitive, measure last year, when that petition failed to collect enough signatures. Voters should do the same with I-1552 and decline to sign.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

Editorial cartoons for Friday, May 17

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Attorney General Bob Ferguson speaks to a reporter as his 2024 gubernatorial campaign launch event gets underway in Seattle, on Saturday, Sept. 9, 2023. ( Jerry Cornfield/Washington State Standard)
Editorial: Recruiting two Bob Fergusons isn’t election integrity

A GOP activist paid the filing fee for two gubernatorial candidates who share the attorney general’s name.

Schwab: Apparently, comparisons of Trump, Biden still necessary

While Biden is rebuilding infrastructure and economy, Trump is dealing for contributions and tribute.

Please continue reporting on hospital discharge backlog

I commend reporter Sydney Jackson’s story in the Weekend Herald on slow… Continue reading

State must provide more financial aid for college students

The costs of attending college have become increasingly more difficult throughout the… Continue reading

Foster parent abstract concept vector illustration. Foster care, father in adoption, happy interracial family, having fun, together at home, childless couple, adopted child abstract metaphor.
Editorial: State must return foster youths’ federal benefits

States, including Washington, have used those benefits, rather than hold them until adulthood.

Making adjustments to keep Social Security solvent represents only one of the issues confronting Congress. It could also correct outdated aspects of a program that serves nearly 90 percent of Americans over 65. (Stephen Savage/The New York Times) -- NO SALES; FOR EDITORIAL USE ONLY WITH NYT STORY SLUGGED SCI SOCIAL SECURITY BY PAULA SPAN FOR NOV. 26, 2018. ALL OTHER USE PROHIBITED.
Editorial: Social Security’s good news? Bad news delayed a bit

Congress has a little additional time to make sure Social Security is solvent. It shouldn’t waste it.

Make your points without insults

Make your points without insults

Editorial cartoons for Thursday, May 16

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Nicholas Kristof: Massacre of innocents has returned to Sudan

Twenty years ago protests and action stopped a genocide. The latest killings are barely registering.

Comment; Congress is broken, but term limits won’t fix it

Looking at term limits in state legislatures, such reforms have resulted in several drawbacks.

Michelle Goldberg: Cohen a cautionary tale for Republicans

Donald Trump’s former fixer now regrets the loyalty he paid to his boss. Are others paying attention?

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.