Editorial: Edmonds voters should retain Mike Nelson as mayor

Diane Buckshnis and Mike Rosen make a case for a change in style. But Nelson has served the city well.

Mike Nelson

Mike Nelson

By The Herald Editorial Board

The race for mayor of Edmonds offers three candidates, including incumbent mayor Mike Nelson, with impressive records of experienced service to the community.

The four candidates for the nonpartisan position are:

Nelson, who has lived in Edmonds for 13 years and served on the city council for four years before winning election to the mayoral post in 2019, taking office at the start of the covid-19 pandemic.

Diane Buckshnis, who has served on the council for 13 years, working with the administration of four different mayors during that time. Her professional work in finance and regulatory work has served her as a fiscal watchdog on the council. Buckshnis also has focused attention on environmental issues within the city and region.

Mike Rosen, retired from a communications and marketing firm with some 100 employees that worked with corporations and government agencies, and has experience with overseeing employees and multi-million dollar budgets. Rosen, a past chair of the city’s planning commission before leaving in 2022, continues work on the board of the Edmonds Center for the Arts.

Brad Shipley, formerly a planner for the city of Edmonds, also ran for mayor in 2019. Shipley did not include contact information when he filed for office and was not contacted to participate in an interview.

During a joint interview with the editorial board, the three did not display wide differences in opinion on many policy issues but did disagree more frequently on management style and Nelson’s record in his first term.

For Buckshnis, Rosen and Nelson, among the more pressing issues for the city of more than 42,000 remain those related to growth, housing and public safety.

One area of agreement for the three is their shared opposition to state legislation that removes some city authority regarding the placement of duplexes and triplexes in single-family residential zones; all three would prefer to see the city keep that control, though each recognized the need to accommodate and plan for growth.

Rosen, while saying Edmonds can prepare for additional housing, noted that it’s not realistic to set rules for the range of cities to which the state law applies, “treating Edmonds the same way they treat Seattle and the same way they treat Spokane.”

Nelson noted the need to address growth beyond housing, for infrastructure related to “green” building standards, transportation, including pedestrian and bike safety and stormwater treatment. Buckshnis agreed, putting an emphasis on stormwater and sewage treatment concerns and the region’s watersheds and streams.

Issues regarding public safety focused on Nelson’s current term, notably a recent departure of the legal firm that had provided prosecution services for the city. Citing a disagreement with the mayor over its contract, the previous firm — which had served the city for 20 years — ended its contract early, forcing the city to make a quick search for a replacement. A three-year contract recently was signed with another firm.

The previous firm notified the city in March of its intention to leave, after a budget address in October by Nelson, in which he signaled his intention to consider handling the prosecution duties in-house. After consideration, Nelson said, the proposal didn’t “pencil-out,” so a search was made for a new firm that Nelson said will cost the city less than the original law firm’s contract.

Buckshnis said the decision by the previous law firm to leave surprised her, mostly because she learned of its letter to the city from a Herald reporter and not the mayor’s office. Rosen said that delay in notification to the council is evidence of a larger problem of communication between the administration and the council and city residents.

“Government serves at the speed of trust,” Rosen said. He promised a change in transparency and engagement between the council and administration and its outreach to the public. Buckshnis, noting some improvement in relations between council and the mayor, said more work is necessary and also promised a change in management style.

In his own defense, Nelson noted that he has yet to veto a council decision and believes that there has been effective collaborative work among council members and the city’s administration.

Buckshnis has faced criticism of her own relations with city staff, after she made comments to a fellow council member in July 2021 regarding the then-public works director’s management of issues related to the Edmonds marsh, saying she felt the director had “ruined” the marsh for years. The public works director left the city that November.

Nelson had a rocky start to his term, even beyond having to deal with the pandemic. There were missteps, shared among himself, city staff, the council and a candidate for the police chief’s job, in the replacement of a retiring police chief. An incomplete check of a finalist’s background — finished only after he was offered the position — led to the eventual loss of a respected internal candidate to another police department. After an extended search, the city hired then-interim chief Michelle Bennett — who started her law enforcement career as a cadet in Edmonds — as chief in August 2021 and has served the city well since.

It’s expected — and fair — for challengers to make their cases for election a referendum on the incumbent’s record and management style. And both Buckshnis and Rosen make valid points about the necessity of transparency and engagement with residents, businesses and others. Both also more than prove their grasp of issues key to Edmonds.

Yet, even noting rough patches for Nelson, he also has posted a good record in terms of recommendations for the allocation of state and federal covid funds to aid businesses in southwest Edmonds and along Highway 99, his advocacy for the city’s “streateries” program that aided business for restaurants during the pandemic, and his pledges to continue work that will improve pedestrian and bicycle safety, connect the cities parks and schools with a multi-use trail system, recent improvements and beautification to Highway 99, continued advocacy for the city’s under-served communities and seeking an agreement with stakeholders on the eventual purchase and ensured protection of the Edmonds marsh by the city.

Edmonds voters are fortunate to have three strong candidates from which to choose as mayor, but — on balance —Nelson’s record deserves a second term.

Correction: An earlier version of this editorial mistakenly omitted the name of candidate Brad Shipley. Shipley did not include contact information in his filing for office and was not contacted regarding an interview.

Primary election

The primary election for local offices is Aug. 1. Ballots, which will be mailed July 12, must be returned to drop boxes or postmarked by Aug. 1. The voters guide will be mailed July 11. Voters also can consult an online voters guide at vote.wa.gov.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial: Using discourse to get to common ground

A Building Bridges panel discussion heard from lawmakers and students on disagreeing agreeably.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Thursday, July 3

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Schwab: Taking pride in our own independence from tyranny

Many of us are Americans by luck of birth here; real pride requires commitment to democratic values.

Comment: Supreme Court removes another presidential guardrail

It’s ruling invalidating nationwide injunctions will require more lawsuits to afford general protections.

Why have intelligence services if Trump already knows?

Why on earth any intelligent person would squander their credibility as Donald… Continue reading

Can Democrats be taken seriously?

Same question, different answer: Ask a Republican have they witnessed the decline… Continue reading

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) speaks during a news conference at the U.S. Capitol on Friday, June 27, 2025. The sweeping measure Senate Republican leaders hope to push through has many unpopular elements that they despise. But they face a political reckoning on taxes and the scorn of the president if they fail to pass it. (Kent Nishimura/The New York Times)
Editorial: GOP should heed all-caps message on tax policy bill

Trading cuts to Medicaid and more for tax cuts for the wealthy may have consequences for Republicans.

Alaina Livingston, a 4th grade teacher at Silver Furs Elementary, receives her Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 vaccine at a vaccination clinic for Everett School District teachers and staff at Evergreen Middle School on Saturday, March 6, 2021 in Everett, Wa. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: RFK Jr., CDC panel pose threat to vaccine access

Pharmacies following newly changed CDC guidelines may restrict access to vaccines for some patients.

Making adjustments to keep Social Security solvent represents only one of the issues confronting Congress. It could also correct outdated aspects of a program that serves nearly 90 percent of Americans over 65. (Stephen Savage/The New York Times) -- NO SALES; FOR EDITORIAL USE ONLY WITH NYT STORY SLUGGED SCI SOCIAL SECURITY BY PAULA SPAN FOR NOV. 26, 2018. ALL OTHER USE PROHIBITED.
Editorial: Congress must act on Social Security’s solvency

That some workers are weighing early retirement and reduced benefits should bother members of Congress.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, July 2

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Why can’t moderates appeal to voters?

I see a democratic socialist may possibly be the next mayor of… Continue reading

Burke: Assessing dangers to democracy, knowing how to respond

In judging a threat consider Trump’s intent and his ability to carry out his intentions.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.