The ballistic-missile submarine USS Henry M. Jackson arrives home at Naval Base Kitsap-Bangor following a strategic deterrent patrol in May 2015. Among projects that lost funding to President Trump’s border wall was a pier for Navy boats that escort submarines based at Bangor (Lt. Cmdr. Brian Badura/U.S. Navy)

The ballistic-missile submarine USS Henry M. Jackson arrives home at Naval Base Kitsap-Bangor following a strategic deterrent patrol in May 2015. Among projects that lost funding to President Trump’s border wall was a pier for Navy boats that escort submarines based at Bangor (Lt. Cmdr. Brian Badura/U.S. Navy)

Editorial: Shuffling money to wall threatens future abuses

Money has been diverted, perhaps unconstitutionally, from vital military projects to fund Trump’s wall.

By The Herald Editorial Board

The diversion of $3.6 billion from military construction projects across the nation and globe to fund some 175 miles of wall along the U.S. border with Mexico won’t affect military bases in Snohomish or Island counties, in particular the U.S. Navy stations in Everett and Oak Harbor.

This time around.

Following the refusal by Congress to allocate billions for the border wall, President Trump declared a national emergency and has used at least two loopholes to defy Congress’ “power of the purse,” reallocating a total of $6.1 billion of Defense Department funding. Earlier, $2.5 billion was diverted from money that Congress allocated for drug interdiction, claiming the wall will do that work better than the programs originally intended. Perhaps, but wasn’t that for Congress to decide?

Now, the Pentagon has released the list of more than 125 construction projects at military bases that will lose funding; at least temporarily. Among the projects is an $89 million pier at Naval Base Kitsap in Bangor that would have been used by the Maritime Force Protection Unit, which escorts submarines and their crews on their way to and from the Bangor naval base. The Bangor project was one of the largest individual projects, among a range of facilities that included weapon maintenance shops, equipment facilities, fire stations, roads, small arms ranges, care centers for service members and even schools for the children of military families.

The shuffling of money may be felt hardest in Puerto Rico, where $400 million in military construction was planned to support recovery efforts following Hurricane Maria. Another $770 million had been allocated for military projects at U.S. bases in Europe, where the United States already faces strained relations with NATO countries as well as the potential for Russian aggression.

Doubts remain about whether Trump’s wall is even an effective tool to slow the pace of illegal immigration.

U.S. Customs and Border Protection reported that illegal border crossings fell to 64,000 in August, down from 144,000 in May, and without any new sections of wall.

Additionally, illegal border crossings have never made up a significant percentage of undocumented immigrants. When it was still tracking these numbers, the Department of Homeland Security found that between October 2016 and September 2017, 700,000 foreigners in the United States, having arrived by plane or ship, were without documentation because they had overstayed their visas. A wall won’t fix that problem. During that same period, illegal border crossings numbered about 106,000.

Military officials are defending the shuffling of funds, by saying the money has been deferred rather than eliminated, but restoration of the funds will require reauthorization by Congress.

The question over reauthorization puts Congress in a difficult spot: Not reauthorizing the money jeopardizes legitimate projects meant to provide the facilities that the U.S. military needs across the globe to do its job. “Backfilling” the funding could be viewed by the Trump administration as tacit approval for his work-around following Congress’ refusal to grant wall funding, encouraging him to use the tactic again for this or any other perceived “emergencies” he wishes to declare.

Some members of Congress already are balking at reauthorization of those funds, among them U.S. Rep. Rick Larsen, the Second District Democrat, who is a senior member on the House Armed Services Committee.

“By circumventing Congress, the president is undermining the United State’s commitment to NATO members and treaty allies, all to pay for an ineffective and wasteful border wall. Taxpayers have already paid for these projects once,” Larsen said in a statement. “I will oppose any efforts in Congress to backfill these accounts.”

Absent a ruling from the courts on the tactic’s constitutionality — and lawsuits have been filed — it remains a seizure of the powers intended for Congress that could be used again by Trump and perhaps by a future presidential administration.

Those who see no problem with the president going around Congress to fund his own priorities, might consider their reaction to a Democratic president declaring climate change an emergency and reallocating military construction money or funding for other programs to protect coastal communities from rising seas and severe storms.

Talk to us

More in Opinion

Editorial cartoons for Monday, March 27

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Construction workers walk along the underside of the Lynnwood Link light rail tracks on Tuesday, March 29, 2022 in Lynnwood, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: What’s needed to get Link light rail on track

Sound Transit needs to streamline its process, while local governments ready for rail and stations.

Cathlamet, the Washington State Ferry that crashed in Seattle last month, sits at the Port of Everett on Thursday, Aug. 25, 2022, in Everett, Washington. The ferry will require extensive repairs after a hard landing crumpled one corner of the boat at the Fauntleroy dock on July 28. (Ryan Berry / The Herald)
Editorial: State needs quicker route for its new ferries

‘Build in Washington’ can be scrapped as a mandate, while still counting benefits of in-state shipyards.

Department of Natural Resources regional manager Allen McGuire, left, and acting bolder unit forester Tyson Whiteid, right, stand next to marker on land recently purchased by the DNR for timber harvest on Wednesday, Sept. 25, 2019 in Gold Bar, Wash. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Use state forestlands to ‘farm’ carbon credits

Legislation would allow the DNR to sell carbon offsets to fund reforestation and other climate work.

Comment: We need to stop trying to beat computers at their game

We can’t match the machines on output or speed. And we shouldn’t try. Let humans do the human stuff.

Saunders: Easy Narcan access might normalize opioid overdoses

There’s a place for harm reduction, but the OD-reversing drug shouldn’t be widely distributed.

Comment: Why Trump’s detour in the bosom of chaos matters

Porn star Stormy Daniels may come out of this with more integrity than Trump could ever muster.

Comment: Republican’s patience with Trump may not be assured

Depending on which charges he faces and the reaction to them, his support could ebb, starting with independents.

The sun turns a deep red as it sets beyond the Port of Everett and the Olympic Mountains on a hazardously smoky evening on Sunday, Oct. 16, 2022, in Everett, Washington. Following the start of the Bolt Creek Fire and other wildfires in the region, air quality in Snohomish County was seemingly always hazardous through September and October. (Ryan Berry / The Herald)
Comment: Yours is not your father’s climate change

Your experience of climate change depends on your generation and that of your children and grandchildren.

Most Read