Efforts to protect us mustn’t eclipse freedom

During the recent House debate to extend the USA Patriot Act, Rep. Martin Meehan, D-Mass., summed up the dilemma:

“How much freedom are we willing to give up to feel safe?”

The House voted to renew the act indefinitely, but put a 10-year limit on two of the most debated provisions – allowing federal agents to use roving wiretaps and to search library and medical records.

During the deliberations, nine Republicans broke ranks and voted with a united Democratic bloc in a failed attempt to make all 16 of the Patriot Act’s most sensitive provisions subject to an additional four-year sunset period.

The Republicans said their vote was an attempt to adhere to the limited government envisioned by the Founding Fathers.

Those concerns are echoed in the Senate’s bill, which also extends the act, but calls for a four-year review of the wiretap and library provisions. The Senate will vote on the bill in the fall, before the two measures are reconciled in a conference committee.

How much freedom are we willing to give up to feel safe?

The roving wiretap provision allows investigators to obtain warrants to intercept a suspect’s phone conversations or Internet traffic without limiting it to a specific phone or identifying the suspect.

The records provision authorizes federal officials to obtain “tangible items,” such as business, library and medical records.

Patriot Act advocates argue that such powers already exist in criminal investigations so they should be continued for terrorism investigations. The House-approved bill also requires that a judge approve the records search. An amendment requires the FBI director to personally approve any request for library or bookstore records.

Critics of the act ask if such powers already exist in criminal investigations, why do we need a separate law to deal with terrorism?

The Justice Department has reported that the powers of the act have been used to convict an Imperial Wizard of the Ku Klux Klan who tried to purchase hand grenades to bomb abortion clinics, to trace a threat to burn down an Islamic Center in El Paso, Texas, to dismantle a terror cell in Portland, and to rescue a baby after its mother was murdered in Missouri.

The powers of the act were also used to conduct a secret search of the home Oregon attorney Brandon Mayfield, a Muslim convert who was wrongly suspected of involvement in the March 2004 Madrid bombings, which killed more than 200 people. After discovering that Mayfield’s fingerprints didn’t match those of a set found at the attack site, the FBI released the lawyer, admitting officials made a mistake and rushed to judgement.

How can we feel safe and secure in our civil liberties when the government can presume us guilty until proven innocent?

Arguing for revisions of the Patriot Act in April, former Rep. Bob Barr, R-Ga., said: “Too many people think the Patriot Act doesn’t affect them, and that if it does, it doesn’t matter. It severs the very foundation of the Fourth Amendment to say that government can invade a person’s privacy and gather information against them without having a sound basis for suspecting that they’ve done something wrong.”

The protection of our rights must be equal to, or greater than, attempts to keep us safe. Congress should keep that in mind as it tries to reconcile the Patriot Act with the truths that we hold to be self-evident.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, July 15

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

2024 Presidential Election Day Symbolic Elements.
Editorial: Perkins, in strong field, best for Marysville council

The fifth-grade teacher hopes to improve outreach and participation with neighborhood meetings.

State should have given ferry contract to shipyard here

The state of Washington’s decision to award its newest ferry construction contract… Continue reading

Some Democrats did question Biden’s fitness to run

Recently, a letter to the editor said that Democrats would not say… Continue reading

Dowd: Trump’s good-looking Cabinet making him look bad

Trump’s toadies are keeping the truth from him and making decisions on their own that dog the president.

Goldberg: Why Nebraska may make GOP pay for its awful bill

It will be tough for Democrats to win the Senate, but an independent union leader could tip the balance.

Comment: Trump era will prove consequential; but as he hopes?

Trump has taken far-reaching steps in foreign and domestic policy. What follows will write his history.

Authorities search for victims among the rubble near Blue Oak RV park after catastrophic flooding on the Guadalupe River in Kerrville, Texas, on Sunday, July 6, 2025. The half-mile stretch occupied by two campgrounds appears to have been one of the deadliest spots along the Guadalupe River in Central Texas during last week’s flash floods. (Jordan Vonderhaar/The New York Times)
Editorial: Tragic Texas floods can prompt reforms for FEMA

The federal agency has an important support role to play, but Congress must reassess and improve it.

2024 Presidential Election Day Symbolic Elements.
Editorial: Retain Escamilla, Binda on Lynnwood City Council

Escamilla was appointed a year ago. Binda is serving his first term.

A Volunteers of America Western Washington crisis counselor talks with somebody on the phone Thursday, July 28, 2022, in at the VOA Behavioral Health Crisis Call Center in Everett, Washington. (Ryan Berry / The Herald)
Editorial: Dire results will follow end of LGBTQ+ crisis line

The Trump administration will end funding for a 988 line that serves youths in the LGBTQ+ community.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Monday, July 14

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Comment: Midterm messaging fight for working class has begun

And Democrats have a head start thanks to the GOP’s all-in support for cuts to the social safety net.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.