Ends don’t justify means on sobriety checkpoints

I had to check my thinking on Gov. Chris Gregoire’s recent call for “sobriety checkpoints.”

Sobriety checkpoints are roadblocks wherein vehicles are randomly stopped in order to determine if the driver might be under the influence of alcohol or some other substance.

Given my penchant for not wanting the government to stick its nose where it doesn’t belong, I knew what my reaction would be, but I wanted to run that reaction by someone who’s rationality has kept me grounded for more than 35 years.

When I asked my wife — the voice of reason and moderation in our family — what she thought about the proposal, she said that being stopped at such a checkpoint “would make me absolutely furious.”

Having had my opinion reinforced, I can now continue.

ADVERTISEMENT
0 seconds of 0 secondsVolume 0%
Press shift question mark to access a list of keyboard shortcuts
00:00
00:00
00:00
 

My opinion of drunk drivers isn’t what would be described as charitable.

Take a trip down “Google” lane. Type in “drunk driving accidents” and the stories you’ll find will boil your blood. One reason will be that, in far too many cases, the individual under the influence and who caused the carnage too often tends to walk away with minor injuries while the innocent get taken to either the hospital or the morgue.

Like many of you, I’ve lost close friends to these clowns and I can’t understand why many of them get off with a light sentence and end up back behind the wheel instead of breaking big rocks into little ones in some godforsaken jail for long periods of time.

I know that some get second, third, and fourth chances because of who they are. I know that some have the money to hire attorneys who can argue the situation into knots that no one can untie. And then there are those who seem to just go through the system and are allowed back on the road until they maim or kill someone.

None of this is right, but it is far too common.

So now, into this situation comes a suggestion that we allow the police to set up roadblocks to help catch those driving under the influence.

Sorry, but as reasonable as it may sound and as good as the intentions behind it are, I can’t support it.

If I’m driving with a broken tail light, stop me and I’ll understand. If I’m speeding or miss a stop sign, pull me over and I’ll accept the ticket. If I’m weaving in and out of traffic and behaving like a bull in the woods, hit the light bar and I’ll understand why I’m being asked to recite the alphabet backwards. I’m an adult. If I screw up on the road, I understand there are consequences for my stupidity.

That said, if I’m minding the speed limit, buckled in as I should be, and going about my business in a vehicle that is in all respects legal, then leave me the heck alone.

I know that driving is a privilege and that the state makes the rules regarding that privilege. However, as regards sobriety checkpoints, I think they’re a step too far. I think that they’re one more inch down an already too long road of government incursion into our private lives. I think that they’re another stretch of the government’s arms into places that those arms shouldn’t be and I’m not liking it.

I want drunk drivers off the road just as badly as anyone out there. Just don’t ask me to support the idea of innocent individuals being pulled over at random and questioned without cause.

Instead of sobriety checkpoints, step up patrols in areas where and during times when we know such driving will occur. Make announcements that the police are going to be exceedingly vigilant while on patrol in order to spot and apprehend those driving under the influence. Make the penalties for DUI hurt and, if someone is caught driving under the influence, beat them over the head with those penalties until the light of understanding goes on in their eyes.

It wouldn’t bother me in the slightest if some repeat offender lost his or her car, spent long periods of time in jail, and was denied a license for years afterward — if said offender were allowed to get it back at all.

Ultimately, however, aside from infuriating my wife, sobriety checkpoints are just not what a free society is all about.

And that’s where I’ll make my stand.

Larry Simoneaux lives in Edmonds. Comments cam be sent to larrysim@clearwire.net.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Thursday, May 15

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Sarah Weiser / The Herald
Air Force One touches ground Friday morning at Boeing in Everett.
PHOTO SHOT 02172012
Editorial: There’s no free lunch and no free Air Force One

Qatar’s offer of a 747 to President Trump solves nothing and leaves the nation beholden.

Comment: Governor should veto change to mortgage interest deduction

A provision in state tax legislation would increase mortgage costs for families buying homes.

Comment: Fair’s fair; kids get 3 dolls, Trump wants 3 jets

Trump’s tariffs require austerity from Americans, except when Trump sees a shinier aircraft on the tarmac.

Comment: Welcome South African refugees, yes, but Afghans, too

There has been no good explanation why Afrikaners are admitted, when so many others are turned away.

Goldberg: Is RFK Jr.’s MAHA movement suffering irony deficiency

His pick for surgeon general is faltering because she isn’t attacking vaccines earnestly enough.

Comment: Nonprofits filling gap left by federal cuts isn’t answer

Relying solely on donors to fulfill needs means providers no longer are accountable to the people.

The Washington State Legislature convenes for a joint session for a swearing-in ceremony of statewide elected officials and Governor Bob Ferguson’s inaugural address, March 15, 2025.
Editorial: 4 bills that need a second look by state lawmakers

Even good ideas, such as these four bills, can fail to gain traction in the state Legislature.

FILE - The sun dial near the Legislative Building is shown under cloudy skies, March 10, 2022, at the state Capitol in Olympia, Wash. An effort to balance what is considered the nation's most regressive state tax code comes before the Washington Supreme Court on Thursday, Jan. 26, 2023, in a case that could overturn a prohibition on income taxes that dates to the 1930s. (AP Photo/Ted S. Warren, File)
Editorial: What state lawmakers acheived this session

A look at some of the more consequential policy bills adopted by the Legislature in its 105 days.

Liz Skinner, right, and Emma Titterness, both from Domestic Violence Services of Snohomish County, speak with a man near the Silver Lake Safeway while conducting a point-in-time count Tuesday, Jan. 23, 2024, in Everett, Washington. The man, who had slept at that location the previous night, was provided some food and a warming kit after participating in the PIT survey. (Ryan Berry / The Herald)
Editorial: County had no choice but to sue over new grant rules

New Trump administration conditions for homelessness grants could place county in legal jeopardy.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, May 14

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Welch: Local elections work best when voters prepare for task

With ballots set, now’s the time to study issues and ask candidates where they stand and what they’ll do.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.