Flooding reality must be addressed

Everett’s public presentations on the riverfront draft master pPlan and on development guidelines were cordially and professionally displayed (Everett Station, Oct. 21 and Dec. 2). As expected, the site plans were not river-integrated. But I was pleasantly surprised to learn that some contributors were aware of this, together with the eventual consequences of river exclusion in floodplain planning.

More gratifying still was a staff statement that Everett “… is not planning for the 1,000-year flood.” I have been pointing this out for years, but in a “heads-up” context; that is, that 1,000-year flooding events are at hand.

What riverfront planners have never grasped is that the official “1,000-year” designation assumes a forested Snohomish River Basin, unravaged by development. But logging, diking, construction, asphalt and concrete have altered decisively the river’s ability to manage excessive runoff.

ADVERTISEMENT
0 seconds of 0 secondsVolume 0%
Press shift question mark to access a list of keyboard shortcuts
00:00
00:00
00:00
 

The numbers do not lie. A few decades hence will bring flooding events that dwarf the “century” floods of recent times. More severely than at any past time, they will impact a floodway no longer forested and naturally buffered against extreme floodwater flows. Everett’s draft plans do not perceive this (even though some of the planners do).

For years I believed that Everett was taking needless risks owing to lack of savvy on river issues. However, since about 2006, at latest, I see Everett risking its soul as well. Surely there exists a special place in hell for a community that knowingly hazards its posterity in exchange for near-term tax dollars.

The planning contributors were doing and saying what they are paid to do and say. But for everyone’s sake, Everett’s elected leaders at the highest levels must soon find compromise between greed and betrayal there.

ALEX G. ALEXANDER

Everett

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer testifies during a budget hearing before a House Appropriations subcommittee on Capitol Hill in Washington on Thursday, May 15, 2025. (Al Drago/The New York Times)
Editorial: Ending Job Corps a short-sighted move by White House

If it’s jobs the Trump administration hopes to bring back to the U.S., it will need workers to fill them.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Monday, June 9

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

A rendering of possible configuration for a new multi-purpose stadium in downtown Everett. (DLR Group)
Editorial: Latest ballpark figures drive hope for new stadium

A lower estimate for the project should help persuade city officials to move ahead with plans.

Comment: Trump’s science policy won’t set a ‘gold standard’

It’s more about centralizing control of science to make it easier to deny what it doesn’t agree with.

Comment: Can NASA’s popularity save it from deep budget cuts?

NASA logos are brand fixtures, a sign of public support. That could wane if cuts limit it’s reach into space.

Comment: Sen. Ernst’s sarcasm won’t help her keep her seat

Her blunt response regarding Medicaid cuts won’t play well in Iowa and won’t win back MAGA faithful.

Comment: Using prejudice against prejudice won’t end antisemitism

The Trump administration’s targeting of immigrants, dissent and universities only assures a longer fight.

A rendering of the new vessels to be built for Washington State Ferries. (Washington State Ferries)
Editorial: Local shipyard should get shot to build state ferries

If allowed to build at least two ferries, Nichols Brothers can show the value building here offers.

Solar panels are visible along the rooftop of the Crisp family home on Monday, Nov. 14, 2022 in Everett, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: ‘Big, beautiful bill’ would take from our climate, too

Along with cuts to the social safety net, the bill robs investments in the clean energy economy.

FILE — A Ukrainian drone pilot in the Kharkiv region of northeastern Ukraine on April 24, 2025. Assaults in Russia and Ukraine have shown major military powers that they are unprepared for evolving forms of warfare, and need to adapt. (Tyler Hicks/The New York Times)
Comment: How Ukraine’s drone strike upends the rules of warfare

Inexpensive drones reached deep into Russia to destroy aircraft that were used against Ukraine.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Sunday, June 8

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

When will Congress stand up to Trump?

Waste, fraud, and abuse? Look no further than the White House. Donald… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.

You're browsing in private mode.
Please sign in or subscribe to continue reading articles in this mode.

The Daily Herald relies on subscription revenue to provide local content for our readers.

Subscribe

Already a subscriber? Please sign in