A view of the Eastglen Wetlands that run through the Eastglen development on Wednesday, Jan. 8, 2025 in Bothell. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald file photo)

Forum: Wetlands too important to be seen as a building site

An amendment to a county land use regulation would reduce wetland buffers, endangering critical lands.

By Jonathan Witte / Herald Forum

When I was a kid my friends and I rode our bikes to a local swamp not far from my house. We spent hours exploring, maybe catching the occasional frog. Swamps weren’t considered to be worth very much unless filled in to build something on them, perhaps houses, or as the case in my hometown, a school.

I’ve learned more about “swamps” now known as wetlands, since those days. They are worth much more than simply being a real estate commodity. They perform a vital role in protecting the well-being of our environment.

As a retired physician, I am particularly aware of and am grateful for the benefits that wetlands also provide for our health. They filter and clean our water by absorbing pollutants. They absorb and slow storm runoff to help prevent flooding. Wetlands remove more carbon from the atmosphere than do forests. Wetlands have also been shown to improve our mental health by providing an access to contact with nature.

Right now our wetlands in Snohomish County are under attack.

The Snohomish County Council is in the process of revising policies relating to Critical Area Regulations, which are part of an updated Snohomish County Comprehensive Plan. The original Ordinance (24-097) proposed by the county’s Planning and Development Services would increase current buffer zones between wetlands and developments.

This proposal was based on scientific studies that determined that such changes would help improve water quality and restore salmon populations. However, an amendment has been introduced that would significantly reduce the size of these buffer zones and even allow some to be eliminated completely. The purported reason for this is to allow for more housing to be built.

This does not have to be an “either or decision.” The council has already made changes to zoning density requirements that will allow for more housing to be constructed and at the same time preserve our critical wetlands.

On May 14 the County Council will hold a public hearing and meet for a final vote on this ordinance with the proposed amendment. I urge you to contact your County Council representative and tell them to pass Ordinance (24-097) without the amendment.

Dr. Jonathan Witte lives in Everett and is a member of the Washington Physicians for Social Responsibility.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

A model of a statue of Billy Frank Jr., the Nisqually tribal fishing rights activist, is on display in the lobby of the lieutenant governor's office in the state Capitol. (Jon Bauer / The Herald.
Editorial: Recognizing state history’s conflicts and common ground

State officials seek consensus in siting statues of an Indian rights activist and a missionary.

November 17, 2025: But Her Emails
Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, Nov. 18

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Where are cartoons lampooning Kamala Harris?

I agree with a recent letter writer, The Herald Opinion page’s cartoons… Continue reading

Editorial cartoons are satire; it’s to be expected

I have read and sent letters to the editor of The Herald… Continue reading

People should rely on own savings not on goverment assistance

Laudable is the social legislation that provides 26 weeks of subsidies to… Continue reading

Comment: What climate ‘realists’ miss are pledges’ quiet wins

Climate fatalists should consider that nations committed to reductions are meeting their targets.

Comment: Too many kids can’t read; blame lack of spelling tests

Leaving the task to spellcheck holds back kids’ skill and love of reading. Spelling is key to comprehension.

FILE — President Donald Trump and Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick display a chart detailing tariffs, at the White House in Washington, on Wednesday, April 2, 2025. The Justices will hear arguments on Wednesday, Nov. 5, 2025 over whether the president acted legally when he used a 1977 emergency statute to unilaterally impose tariffs.(Haiyun Jiang/The New York Times)
Editorial: Public opinion on Trump’s tariffs may matter most

The state’s trade interests need more than a Supreme Court ruling limiting Trump’s tariff power.

Editorial: Welcome guidance on speeding public records duty

The state attorney general is advancing new rules for compliance with the state’s public records law.

Canceled flights on a flight boards at Chicago O’Hare International Airport in Chicago, on Friday, Nov. 7, 2025. Major airports appeared to be working largely as normal on Friday morning as a wave of flight cancellations hit the U.S. (Jamie Kelter Davis/The New York Times)
Editorial: With deal or trust, Congress must restart government

With the shutdown’s pain growing with each day, both parties must find a path to reopen government.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Monday, Nov. 17

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Comment: Ignoring Trump, stock market believes in climate crisis

Green energy and cleantech indices are outperforming the overall market. You can partially thanks AI’s demand.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.