Free community college program shouldn’t use GET funds

Washington’s Guaranteed Education Tuition (GET) Fund is a 529 Plan comprised of a series of accounts owned by parents and others to cover future undergraduate tuition for a specified child. Parents/grandparents and others can contribute to funding the education of a child in this way. The ultimate benefit that each child receives is based on how much has been contributed to their individual account. These accounts may hold tuition credit units up to the cost of eight years (at 100 credit units a year) of undergraduate tuition at colleges or universities.

All of the money in the GET Fund is contributed by account holders. The state’s role in this is to ensure that 100 units, regardless of the unit cost at the time of purchase, will cover one year of undergraduate tuition at the time the child requires the credits. Of course the purchase cost of each unit varies over time as the cost of tuition rises.

My concern is that the proposed “Washington 13 Free Guarantee” legislation proposed in HB 2309) would rely partially on funding from a so called GET program “surplus” discussed in a recent editorial (“Year of free college a boost to students, state,” The Herald Feb. 6). My questions are: 1) how could there be a “surplus,” since all of the money in the program was contributed by parents, etc. for the benefit of their child’s college tuition and, 2) why would any use for these funds outside the GET program’s intended purpose be considered?

It appears that the Legislature has found a pot of money in GET and, of course, legislators can always find a use for such a find. I fully support the intent of HB 2309, but it should not be funded on the back of the GET program account holders, even partially.

John Baker

Mukilteo

Editor’s note: As noted in the editorial, the GET fund is supported by contributions that are invested by the state’s investment board, earning proceeds on those investments. The current fund holds more than 150 percent of its current obligations to future students enrolled in GET, resulting in a “surplus” of more than $500 million above what the program is obligated to provide GET students. HB 2309 would allocate $300 million from the GET fund as one of three sources to provide all students with a year of community or technical college tuition.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
A Black-capped Chickadee sits on a branch in the Narbeck Wetland Sanctuary on Wednesday, April 24, 2024 in Everett, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Bird act’s renewal can aid in saving species

It provides funding for environmental efforts, and shows the importance of policy in an election year.

David Brooks: America’s massive debt gambles with our future

Neither presidential candidate nor Congress seem interested in a fix. The voters will have to lead them.

Torture, killing of wolf showed disrespect for life

On Feb. 29 in Sublette County, Wyoming, Cody Roberts intentionally struck down… Continue reading

Thanks to Tulalip marine patrol after boat motor died

A huge thank you to the Tulalip Tribal marine enforcement staff for… Continue reading

Comment: ‘Security risk’ excuse fails against peaceful protest

Police were called in to break up a protest at USC that included yoga, kite-making and a Jewish hymn reading.

Harrop: Solving homelessness shouldn’t cost us our parks

A Supreme Court ruling may give cities back their authority on health and safety concerns for public spaces.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, April 30

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Volunteers with Stop the Sweeps hold flyers as they talk with people during a rally outside The Pioneer Courthouse on Monday, April 22, 2024, in Portland, Ore. The rally was held on Monday as the Supreme Court wrestled with major questions about the growing issue of homelessness. The court considered whether cities can punish people for sleeping outside when shelter space is lacking. (AP Photo/Jenny Kane)
Editorial: Cities don’t need to wait for ruling on homelessness

Forcing people ‘down the road’ won’t end homelessness; providing housing and support services will.

Logging and replanting reduces more carbon emissions

I am responding to the recent exchange of letters regarding the effects… Continue reading

Biden has made country better place

A recent letter to the editor presented an argument against Joe Biden.… Continue reading

Comment: Kids of single parents may benefit if grandma moves in

Two married parents are optimal for children, but kids also fare well in multi-generational families.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.