Harrop: Democrats need to sell their American message

“America First” is taken, but the left can show it has the economic interests of Americans at heart.

By Froma Harrop

“America First” would be a harmless phrase were it not loaded with dark undertones. It harks back to the America First Committee, a group advocating U.S. neutrality in World War II. Some members were Nazi sympathizers, while others simply wanted to keep America out of another bloody conflict in Europe. The attack on Pearl Harbor put the committee out of business.

One can be sure that few Americans hear that historical echo when President Trump repeatedly talks up “America First.” Packing a strong emotion, the term speaks of leaders protecting the people’s interests. That Democrats would be doing an overall better job of it isn’t the point here. It’s that Democrats are lousy at conveying this message.

Of course the American president is supposed to put America first. The French president puts France first. The Chinese president puts China first. The Russian president puts Russia first.

That doesn’t mean they are all effective. The economy under Trump is, if anything, idling in neutral. His tax cuts have provided economic “rocket fuel” mainly for rich investors and have exploded deficits. True, U.S. oil production has hit record highs, and wages are inching up — but they did under Barack Obama (whom Trump portrayed as a foreigner not looking out for “us”).

Trashing trade deals is a cornerstone of the “America First” program. It’s a sorry scene, big on drama, short on results. Trump’s trade policies are a mess of revolving withdrawals, delays, extensions and insults — sadly aimed at the allies we need to confront China’s unfair practices.

The most potent issue in Trump’s “America First” platform is immigration. On this, Democrats must pay heed. Every time Trump’s flagging political fortunes need a shot, he plays on working-class fears of foreigners taking their jobs.

These fears are not unwarranted and not limited to those without college degrees. Arizona, where teachers walked out over pathetically low pay, is one of many states that have hired cheaper replacements from the Philippines. The American Federation of Teachers has condemned the visa program that brings in foreign teachers to undercut its members.

Democrats should and do condemn Trump’s ugly racial remarks regarding immigrants. They should talk up the important role immigrants play in our economy and demand humane treatment of the foreign-born.

But they often don’t make clear that Americans’ interests should be paramount. Our immigration program doesn’t exist to give opportunity to people who want to come here. (That it does is a happy byproduct of the program, not a reason for it.)

Americans should get to decide who and how many people come to this country — just as Canadians and Australians do. And those considerations should change as conditions in our labor markets change.

A few years back, Democrats and some Republicans backed a sensible bill that would have granted legal status to most undocumented immigrants while greatly tightening enforcement going forward. To build the public’s confidence in the enforcement part, President Obama backed a rise in deportations focused on those who committed crimes.

Many Democrats abandoned him, caving to immigration activists demanding virtually no enforcement. Never mind that the vast majority of Latino workers are here legally — over half are native-born — and many without college degrees suffer the same downward pressure on wages as similarly situated whites, blacks and others.

As for a new slogan, “America First” is taken, and Democrats shouldn’t want it. Whatever they come up with, however, should roll everyone into a single American identity, regardless of race, creed or gender distinction.

Democrats, go ahead and use your identity pitches for grass-roots targeting, but put sea-to-shining-sea imagery in your skywriting. That would be good for America, as well as for you.

Follow Froma Harrop on Twitter @FromaHarrop. Email her at fharrop@gmail.com.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Friday, Nov. 21

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

FILE — The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau logo is seen through a window at the CFPB offices in Washington on Sept. 23, 2019. Employees of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau were instructed to cease “all supervision and examination activity” and “all stakeholder engagement,” effectively stopping the agency’s operations, in an email from the director of the Office of Management and Budget, Russell Vought, on Saturday, Feb. 8, 2025. (Ting Shen/The New York Times)
Editorial: Keep medical debt off credit score reporting

The federal CFPB is challenging a state law that bars medical debt from credit bureaus’ consideration.

Schwab: Release the files? Sure; Trump has nothing to hide.

The man’s an open book. And scandals that would destroy others’ political lives are a MAGA selling point.

Few seem to understand property taxes, Port of Everett included

Regarding the Nov. 13 front-page article about the Port of Everett’s 2026… Continue reading

Protect access and conservation of our public lands

I am one of millions of Americans who love our nation’s public… Continue reading

Won’t somone explain tariffs to Trump?

To borrow from the caption for The Herald Editorial Board’s Nov. 15… Continue reading

No Kings rally: Kids say darndest things

At Snohomish’s very large and very peaceful No Kings rally there was… Continue reading

A model of a statue of Billy Frank Jr., the Nisqually tribal fishing rights activist, is on display in the lobby of the lieutenant governor's office in the state Capitol. (Jon Bauer / The Herald.
Editorial: Recognizing state history’s conflicts and common ground

State officials seek consensus in siting statues of an Indian rights activist and a missionary.

FILE — President Donald Trump and Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick display a chart detailing tariffs, at the White House in Washington, on Wednesday, April 2, 2025. The Justices will hear arguments on Wednesday, Nov. 5, 2025 over whether the president acted legally when he used a 1977 emergency statute to unilaterally impose tariffs.(Haiyun Jiang/The New York Times)
Editorial: Public opinion on Trump’s tariffs may matter most

The state’s trade interests need more than a Supreme Court ruling limiting Trump’s tariff power.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Thursday, Nov. 20

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Comment: Trump’s $2,000 tariff rebates are a shell game

Most Americans have already paid $1,800 in price increases from the tariffs. It’s another distraction.

Comment: If Trump cares about affordability, he must show it

It will take more than reducing tariffs on a few items; he must show he understands consumers’ pain.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.