Harrop: Have frequently flying ‘f***s’ lost impact in speech?

Pop culture turns to it often for effect, but the obscenity seems to have lost its ability to shock.

By Froma Harrop / Creators.com

I asked my dear friend Mimi whether a lady can ever use the F-word. Mimi is a product of old guard propriety, which to me, makes her an impeccable source on these matters. Mimi’s answer was short: “No.”

But she wanted to elaborate. “Well,” she added, “I’ve just started using the word s•••.” If you knew Mimi, you’d understand what an enormous accommodation that was to the 21st century.

The F-word is in the Oxford English Dictionary, fully spelled out and taking up nearly two columns. The word’s not new. The dictionary suspects it dates back to Middle English. It notes that “f•••” has been regarded as “a taboo-word for centuries” and “until recent times not often recorded in print but frequent in coarse speech.” As you undoubtedly know, it refers to copulation.

I confess that I’ve blurted it out on rare occasions; and mainly for literary effect. I never use it in ordinary conversation and certainly not in published writing.

I asked my editor at Creators Syndicate about this and other rules governing words her writers may use, specifically the word “damn.”

“Good question!” Alessandra Caruso wrote back. “AP does suggest avoiding profanity — including ‘damn’ — unless absolutely necessary, so my recommendation would be to use ‘darn’ or some other G-rated alternative.” She added, however, “If you do wish to use ‘damn,’ I would send it through with an editor’s note (as opposed to, let’s say, the F-word, which I would send through as ‘f•••‘). Hope this answers your question.”

It did. But while I would never use “f•••” in my journalism, I long wanted free rein to use “damn.”

True, Clark Gable’s last line in “Gone with the Wind” was nearly cut because he said “damn”; as in “Frankly, my dear, I don’t give a damn.” But that was 1939. Who gives a damn about damn these days?

The F-word is something else. It’s still jarring to hear it thrown around the street by well-groomed young people. And too often it detracts from meaningful conversation in movies and streaming series. The writers probably think of it as a way to make a character seem tough. Humphrey Bogart didn’t need it.

The 1951 American classic “The Catcher in the Rye” raised more than a few eyebrows when its young protagonist used the F-word. The author J.D. Salinger’s intention was to underscore the kid’s phony bravado.

It was distracting for the rich Roy children in “Succession” to say “f•••” more often than they said “and,” especially because the writers also blessed their conversations with clever thoughts. Perhaps that, too, was intended to show bravado.

“Will & Grace,” the first network show to feature openly gay men, made history again when, in 1999, a character used another F-word, in this case referring to the anti-gay slur. Sponsors pulled out, and the episode vanished.

Interestingly, the Katy Independent School District in Texas canceled a visit by noted novelist Emma Straub over her use of the F-word on social media. Odd that Straub would do that, given she is a noted writer of children’s picture books.

Many younger online political commentators throw around the F-word with abandon. The obscenity often seems placed to make their insights sound more exciting than they are.

The “Star Wars” franchise was recently warming up to set off the F-bomb in its latest offering. The plan was to let it burst from the mouth of Maarva Andor without even a “pardon my Middle English” in front. Disney said nope. And so “F••• the empire” was rewritten as “Fight the empire.”

How the Galactic Republic feels about this, we do not know. Maarva may be irked, but not me. Frankly, my dear, I don’t give a fig.

Follow Froma Harrop on Twitter @FromaHarrop. Email her at fharrop@gmail.com Copyright 2023, Creators.com.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, June 24

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Making adjustments to keep Social Security solvent represents only one of the issues confronting Congress. It could also correct outdated aspects of a program that serves nearly 90 percent of Americans over 65. (Stephen Savage/The New York Times) -- NO SALES; FOR EDITORIAL USE ONLY WITH NYT STORY SLUGGED SCI SOCIAL SECURITY BY PAULA SPAN FOR NOV. 26, 2018. ALL OTHER USE PROHIBITED.
Editorial: Congress must act on Social Security’s solvency

That some workers are weighing early retirement and reduced benefits should bother members of Congress.

Kristof: Bombing of Iranian nuclear sites leaves 3 key unknowns

We don’t know how Iran will respond, if the attacks were successful or if they can lead to a new regime.

Harrop: With success against Iranian targets, time to step back

Trump’s call to strike was right, as is his declaration to shift the conversation to negotiations.

Stephens: Trump made right call to block Iran’s nuclear plans

While there are unknowns, the bombing leaves Iran with few options other than negotiation.

Comment: Immigration crackdown has economic fallout for all

Undocumented workers are a major source of labor in many fields. Replacing them won’t be easy; or cheap.

Comment: Trump isn’t first president to treat press badly

It doesn’t excuse excluding the AP from the Oval Office, but presidential cold shoulders are nothing new.

THis is an editorial cartoon by Michael de Adder . Michael de Adder was born in Moncton, New Brunswick. He studied art at Mount Allison University where he received a Bachelor of Fine Arts in drawing and painting. He began his career working for The Coast, a Halifax-based alternative weekly, drawing a popular comic strip called Walterworld which lampooned the then-current mayor of Halifax, Walter Fitzgerald. This led to freelance jobs at The Chronicle-Herald and The Hill Times in Ottawa, Ontario.

 

After freelancing for a few years, de Adder landed his first full time cartooning job at the Halifax Daily News. After the Daily News folded in 2008, he became the full-time freelance cartoonist at New Brunswick Publishing. He was let go for political views expressed through his work including a cartoon depicting U.S. President Donald Trump’s border policies. He now freelances for the Halifax Chronicle Herald, the Toronto Star, Ottawa Hill Times and Counterpoint in the USA. He has over a million readers per day and is considered the most read cartoonist in Canada.

 

Michael de Adder has won numerous awards for his work, including seven Atlantic Journalism Awards plus a Gold Innovation Award for news animation in 2008. He won the Association of Editorial Cartoonists' 2002 Golden Spike Award for best editorial cartoon spiked by an editor and the Association of Canadian Cartoonists 2014 Townsend Award. The National Cartoonists Society for the Reuben Award has shortlisted him in the Editorial Cartooning category. He is a past president of the Association of Canadian Editorial Cartoonists and spent 10 years on the board of the Cartoonists Rights Network.
Editorial cartoons for Monday, June 23

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

In this Sept. 2017, photo made with a drone, a young resident killer whale chases a chinook salmon in the Salish Sea near San Juan Island, Wash. The photo, made under a National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) permit, which gives researchers permission to approach the animals, was made in collaboration with NOAA Fisheries/Southwest Fisheries Science Center, SR3 Sealife Response, Rehabilitation, and Research and the Vancouver Aquarium's Coastal Ocean Research Institute. Endangered Puget Sound orcas that feed on chinook salmon face more competition from seals, sea lions and other killer whales than from commercial and recreational fishermen, a new study finds. (John Durban/NOAA Fisheries/Southwest Fisheries Science Center via AP)
Editorial: A loss for Northwest tribes, salmon and energy

The White House’s scuttling of the Columbia Basin pact returns uncertainty to salmon survival.

Comment: MAGA coalition may not survive U.S. attack on Iran

Split over Trump’s campaign promise of no ‘forever wars,’ his supporters are attacking each other.

Stephens: Here’s one path for Trump in dealing with Iran

The U.S. should bomb a nuclear facility at Fordo, but then follow with a carrot-and-stick offer.

Ask voters what they want done on immigration

Immigration Ask voters what they want done What a fine collection of… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.