I-728 looks good on the outside, but it’s a lemon


Initiative 728 is like buying a shiny new car — that has no engine. It looks really good on the outside. But if you buy it, it will just take your money and it won’t get you anywhere.

Please read I-728 — its supporters hope you won’t. It assures you nothing —except more of your hard-earned money will be sent off to bureaucrats for them to spend. The supporters say it won’t increase your taxes. Not now because you are paying too much in state taxes. There’s a surplus now because of our strong economy. But when the economy slows – expect tax increases because I-728 spends more! They didn’t tell you that.

It does not assure any class-size reduction. Read Section 3 of I-728. It states, "School districts shall have the authority to decide the best use of student achievement funds." Then it goes on to list six purposes the districts can spend the extra money on. Class-size reduction is in only two of the six options and they don’t have to spend one penny on class-size reduction.

It does not assure any improved student achievement. Read it. If you can find anything in I-728 that assures any improvements in student achievement — vote for I-728. If not — vote NO! Even if you read it very, very carefully, you won’t find any assurance. It isn’t there. Like the shiny new car with no engine, I-728 won’t take you where you want to go.

I-728 simply uses the glitz and allure of reducing class size — something we all can support — to try and convince taxpayers to open their wallets and let the bureaucrats in to take more out without having to show anything for the money they take.

Now if that is not enough, I-728 dodges the voter approved state-spending limit — Initiative 601. Prior to the enactment of I-601, state spending was growing far faster than both inflation and population growth combined. Six months before voters passed I-601, the Legislature enacted the state’s largest tax increase in history in order to fund its spending binge. I-601 has controlled state spending since its voter approval in 1993. Part of I-601 requires that state spending be reduced if money now going into the state’s general fund is transferred away to pay for something else. But I-728 changes I-601 and allows $465 million now going into the state’s general fund (money that is used primarily to fund education), to transfer to this new student achievement fund, but does not reduce general fund spending. This increases the state’s spending limit by $465 million above the limit now set by I-601. Why haven’t the promoters of I-728 explained that to you?

Unfortunately, there is still more deception hidden in I-728. A July report by the state Senate Committee Services says, "However, when compared to existing state law, there is actually an estimated net reduction in funds available for education construction purposes of $411 million." That’s right — reduction. I-728 actually takes badly needed money away from school construction and transfers it to this new student achievement account that doesn’t have to show anything for your hard-earned tax dollars.

Don’t let them put a guilt trip on you to get your vote. According to the National Education Association, Washington state taxpayers provide one of the highest levels of state funding for public education in the nation. State funding for pubic education averages 48.9 percent of school budgets nationally — Washington state is at 68.7 percent. There are only three states higher.

The problem in Washington state is not how much taxpayers are spending on public education. The problem is how your hard-earned tax money is being used. The Evergreen Freedom Foundation found that taxpayers are already spending $7,933 per student per year on public education. But only $2,812 of that amount is actually being spent in the classroom on basic education. Wow! Talk about overhead. The real answer is getting more bang from your hard-earned tax dollars they are already getting — not giving them more money.

That’s why the Seattle Times and other respected newspapers have already recommended a no vote on I-728. If you really read I-728 carefully, you too will see that a no vote is the right vote.

Finally, if you voted for I-695 — the $30 car tab initiative — you probably did so because you wanted your taxes to go down and state government to run more efficiently. I-728 does just the opposite of I-695. I-728 gives bureaucrats $465 million more to spend with no accountability. It means tax increases in your future. So, if you voted for I-695, you’ll want to vote NO on I-728.

Don’t get taken by I-728. Like that shiny, very good-looking car, check under the hood (read all of I-728). You’ll see that it has no engine and it won’t get you where you want to go. Vote NO on I-728.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

FILE - A worker cleans a jet bridge at Paine Field in Everett, Wash., before passengers board an Alaska Airlines flight, March 4, 2019. Seattle-based Alaska Airlines owns Horizon Air. Three passengers sued Alaska Airlines on Thursday, Nov. 2, 2023, saying they suffered emotional distress from an incident last month in which an off-duty pilot, was accused of trying to shut down the engines of a flight from Washington state to San Francisco. (AP Photo/Ted S. Warren, File)
Editorial: FAA bill set to improve flight safety, experience

With FAA reauthorization, Congress proves it’s capable of legislating and not just throwing shade.

French: In war, the grieving must wait until the return home

When death comes for your brothers in war, it leaves a wound on your soul that never fully heals.

Blow: How to respond to childish taunts meant to go viral

When members of Congress descend into click-bait-intended insults, has all focus on legislating been lost?

Krugman: How do you solve a problem like ‘vibesession’?

Most people will tell you they’re in good financial shape, but the economy isn’t. Except, it is.

Friedman: Western Europe sends Israel message it can’t ignore

The decision by three nations to endorse a Palestinian state won’t move Israelis. It will move others.

Expanding grants will help more students get college degrees

For good or ill, the American labor force is being automated. To… Continue reading

Was I-5’s long closure necessary?

It seems there needs to be a rational discussion and possibly a… Continue reading

Balloon releases are harming wildlife

When will the media stop perpetuating the myth that releasing balloons into… Continue reading

The author’s 19-year-old niece, Veronika, was among seven people killed by a gunman on May 23, 2014, in Isla Vista, Calif.
Comment: I lost my niece to gun violence 10 years ago this week

Since then, Washington state voters and lawmakers have taken bold steps to discourage gun violence.

Editorial cartoons for Sunday, May 26

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

The vessel Tonga Chief, a 10-year-old Singaporean container ship, is moored at the Port of Everett Seaport in November, 2023, in Everett. (Ryan Berry / The Herald file photo)
Editorial: Leave port tax issue for campaign, not the ballot

Including “taxing district” on ballot issue to expand the Port of Everett’s boundaries is prejudicial.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.